Page 20 of 91 FirstFirst ... 10171819202122233070 ... LastLast
Results 476 to 500 of 2268

Thread: The ATI Radeon 5XXX Thread

  1. #476
    Xtreme Enthusiast
    Join Date
    Feb 2009
    Posts
    800
    Quote Originally Posted by onethreehill View Post
    It was posted ages ago. It had its own thread for awhile. Radeon HD 5870 "Six"

  2. #477
    Xtreme Enthusiast
    Join Date
    Feb 2009
    Posts
    800
    CryEngine 3




    Alien versus Predator



    Backside of the card, http://www.widescreengamingforum.com...ic.php?t=16780 .



    Um, the 2nd card from the top is... a bit different.



    To be honest, I wish everyone put SOURCES for their pictures.
    Last edited by blindbox; 09-11-2009 at 03:58 PM.

  3. #478
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Nov 2008
    Posts
    54
    Quote Originally Posted by Glow9 View Post
    Well if Odyssey96 says so it must be fact.
    Quote me then smartass.

  4. #479
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Posts
    1,463
    Quote Originally Posted by Glow9 View Post
    Well if Odyssey96 says so it must be fact.
    Well IMO, odyssey96 is correct about what he is saying.
    I posted this 3 weeks ago:
    Hemlock ------~P28k-P30k (4870 quadfire, gtx295 quad sli, or better)
    http://www.xtremesystems.org/forums/...&postcount=174

    I agree with him.
    Bring... bring the amber lamps.
    [SIGPIC][/SIGPIC]

  5. #480
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Posts
    1,463
    Quote Originally Posted by Olivon View Post
    Seems to be 0.4ns, 5.0Gbps (K4XXXXXXXX-XC04), Samsung Specs Here but not for sure ...
    Yes, looks like the .4ns 1gbit. Hope they oc to ~1400mhz. Rated for 5ghz, so 1250mhz should be easy on stock volt.
    04 : 0.40ns (5.0Gbps)
    K4G10325FE 32Mx32 32Mx16 1.5V ± 0.045V
    http://www.samsung.com/global/system...uide_q2_09.pdf
    edit:

    http://www.forum-3dcenter.org/vbulle...16524&page=196
    Last edited by jaredpace; 09-11-2009 at 04:57 PM.
    Bring... bring the amber lamps.
    [SIGPIC][/SIGPIC]

  6. #481
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    Jul 2007
    Location
    Alberta, Canada
    Posts
    1,264
    I'm wondering if going for the 2GB variant will be worth it and whether these will be all that loud. Given 188watt max and a cooler of that size, you'd think it would be more quiet than the 4870/4890s. Considering CF doesn't scale awesome in everything, I expect the 5870 to overtake it in a fair few games so that is somewhat attractive. What I'm really wondering now is how they'll do an X2 version? I'm honestly expecting it to be less than 2 5870s (eg 285vs295) as I don't see them saving over 60 watts by having only 1 pcb.
    Feedanator 7.0
    CASE:R5|PSU:850G2|CPU:i7 6850K|MB:x99 Ultra|RAM:8x4 2666|GPU:980TI|SSD:BPX256/Evo500|SOUND:2i4/HS8
    LCD:XB271HU|OS:Win10|INPUT:G900/K70 |HS/F:H115i

  7. #482
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Nov 2008
    Posts
    54
    Quote Originally Posted by jaredpace View Post
    Well IMO, odyssey96 is correct about what he is saying.
    I posted this 3 weeks ago:

    http://www.xtremesystems.org/forums/...&postcount=174

    I agree with him.
    Seeing as my source is ATI, I'm glad you see my way

  8. #483
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    Apr 2007
    Posts
    2,476
    Quote Originally Posted by jaredpace View Post
    Well IMO, odyssey96 is correct about what he is saying.
    I posted this 3 weeks ago:

    http://www.xtremesystems.org/forums/...&postcount=174

    I agree with him.
    I can pull stuff out of my ass, so why should we take what you guys say is fact?

    Quote Originally Posted by Odyssey96 View Post
    Seeing as my source is ATI, I'm glad you see my way
    See now we are getting somewhere.
    i3 2100, MSI H61M-E33. 8GB G.Skill Ripjaws.
    MSI GTX 460 Twin Frozr II. 1TB Caviar Blue.
    Corsair HX 620, CM 690, Win 7 Ultimate 64bit.

  9. #484
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    Jun 2008
    Posts
    197

    Talking Dirt 2...




  10. #485
    Admin
    Join Date
    Feb 2005
    Location
    Ann Arbor, MI
    Posts
    12,338

  11. #486
    Xtreme Mentor
    Join Date
    Jul 2004
    Posts
    3,247
    Juniper XT is Radeon HD 5770 and Juniper LE is HD 5750

    While all eyes are on the Radeon HD 5800 "Cypress" series, there is another series quietly brewing beneath AMD which NVIDIA should be really afraid of. It is targeted at the mainstream market which is no doubt the most important segment for both camps.

    Juniper XT and LE will be officially named Radeon HD 5770 and Radeon HD 5750 respectively when launched. HD 5770 card is codenamed Countach while HD 5750 is codenamed Corvette and they both come with 1GB GDDR5 memories on 128-bit memory interface. Juniper will possess all the features of its higher end counterpart like 40nm, DX11, Eyefinity technology, ATI Stream, UVD2, GDDR5 and best of all, it is going to be very affordable.

    One of the reason why AMD is not mass producing Radeon HD 4700 (RV740) series now is because HD 5700 series will be replacing it soon and will come one month after HD 5800 series. It will meet head on against the NVIDIA's D10P1 (GT215) series in October so expect a full fledge war then. With a performance target of 1.6x over the HD 4770 and 1.2x over the HD 4750, they are surely packed with enough power to pit against the NVIDIA's lineup. Pair them up and you will get a boost of 1.8x which is roughly the performance of a Cypress card .........
    http://vr-zone.com/articles/juniper-....html?doc=7626

  12. #487
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Location
    Istantinople
    Posts
    1,574
    So Cypress performs 1.2 x 1.8 = 2.16 of a 4750?

    Cos rumors say it that Cypress = 2x 4870, not 4750 :S
    Has anyone really been far even as decided to use even go want to do look more like?
    INTEL Core i7 920 // ASUS P6T Deluxe V2 // OCZ 3G1600 6GB // POWERCOLOR HD5970 // Cooler Master HAF 932 // Thermalright Ultra 120 Extreme // SAMSUNG T260 26"

  13. #488
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    Apr 2008
    Location
    Ottawa, Canada
    Posts
    2,443
    I want to see real performance numbers before anything else. All this talk of 2X performance this and 14X performance that is BS to me till I see it in independent benchmarks/reviews. Nice to see some pics though as well as pics of some of the new features.

  14. #489
    Xtreme Enthusiast
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Posts
    752
    this could be one of the most epic launches in history

    or one of the biggest flops

    I'm certainly hoping for the former

  15. #490
    Xtreme Enthusiast
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Location
    QLD
    Posts
    942
    I love it how codemasters has to hide beneath a million post processing effects to cover for its shoddy visual work. Cannot wait to see some real DX11 titles though, and a few 20 page long 5xxx reviews

  16. #491
    Banned
    Join Date
    Aug 2008
    Posts
    1,052
    Quote Originally Posted by saaya View Post
    i dont think its a bs gimmick, its def a nice feature... i only have one display and wont go multi monitor for now... but once displays with REALLY tiny or no bezel show up im going to get a set for sure! ive been looking for a wider than 16:9 display forever but just couldnt find a propper one... id def get two displays if it would be possible to merge them like one and have only 2mm or so of bezel in the center...
    Well perhaps we can appoint you as Mr Eyefinity and you can let us all know when issues like cost, deskspace, power consumption, minimum framerates, 20 to 30mm combined bezel space, driver issues are no longer things we need to worry about and that Eyefinity will stop being a near worthless gimmick for 99% of users.


    Quote Originally Posted by cegras View Post
    You are surprisingly hurt about me (apparently?) insinuating you're an nvidia fanboy, which I have not stated at all. I merely hinted that you either do not like new technology or you are skeptical about something you haven't even had a chance to try.
    Quote Originally Posted by cegras View Post
    I can see, however, that you will never be convinced, most likely because you are either a staunch critic of new technology (!) or you don't like ATI (!).
    Perhaps you should spend a bit of time rereading what you post?


    Quote Originally Posted by cegras View Post
    My crusade is to prevent people from taking what you say seriously.
    I suspect there are more nobel crusade's one could dedicate themselves to.

  17. #492
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2004
    Posts
    162
    As a person who has and owns Both company's cards. I applaud AMD-ATI for an incredible accomplishment. Now where are the nay-sayers for AMD buying ATI!

  18. #493
    Banned
    Join Date
    Aug 2008
    Posts
    1,052
    Quote Originally Posted by purefun65 View Post
    As a person who has and owns Both company's cards. I applaud AMD-ATI for an incredible accomplishment. Now where are the nay-sayers for AMD buying ATI!
    So this presentation is proof that the $3billion too much that AMD paid for ATI, was in fact worth it?

  19. #494
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    Nov 2007
    Location
    Illinois
    Posts
    2,095
    Quote Originally Posted by Chad Boga View Post
    Well perhaps we can appoint you as Mr Eyefinity and you can let us all know when issues like cost, deskspace, power consumption, minimum framerates, 20 to 30mm combined bezel space, driver issues are no longer things we need to worry about and that Eyefinity will stop being a near worthless gimmick for 99% of users.


    Perhaps you should spend a bit of time rereading what you post?



    I suspect there are more nobel crusade's one could dedicate themselves to.
    Cost / deskspace - I don't see how this would be too much of an issue. People who can accord luxuries will buy into this, people who won't will still be buying budget cards with 15" LCDs.

    Power consumption: Seriously?

    Minimum framerates: Again, this is meant for games that this card is super overpowered on already.

    Bezel space: You choose an odd x odd grid of monitors so your center piece is a monitor and not a bezel. Simple enough?

    Driver issues: It's already been said that the driver merges it into one large resolution and the game treats it as such. At least, from what's available.

    I think we had this discussion, Chad, where I patiently explained to you that just because a is not b, it does not mean a is c. This is perfectly analogous to you calling me an amd fanboy just because I said that intel's shillman (that Francois guy) was posting rampantly on a consumer forum and I didn't like that at all.

    There might be, but uh, I'd rather people not get swayed by his terrible rhetoric.
    Last edited by cegras; 09-11-2009 at 07:03 PM.
    E7200 @ 3.4 ; 7870 GHz 2 GB
    Intel's atom is a terrible chip.

  20. #495
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2004
    Posts
    162
    Quote Originally Posted by Chad Boga View Post
    So this presentation is proof that the $3billion too much that AMD paid for ATI, was in fact worth it?
    proof no! given their limited resources and r&d. A company only headed in the right direction.

  21. #496
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    Feb 2007
    Posts
    1,674
    ugh. The new ruby looks ugly. The old one was way better.

  22. #497
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2005
    Location
    CA
    Posts
    172
    Quote Originally Posted by cegras View Post
    Cost / deskspace - I don't see how this would be too much of an issue. People who can accord luxuries will buy into this, people who won't will still be buying budget cards with 15" LCDs.
    I'm pretty sure cost will be the issue for 99% of people. No way am I buying 6 monitors.
    Intel D975XBX2
    X6800 ES @3.6 Ghz
    4X1024MB OCZ DDR2 PC2-6400 Gold Dual Channel 4-4-4-12
    2x500GB Western Digial SATA II HDD-Raid 0
    Sapphire Radeon HD 4870 512MB
    Corsair HX620W
    Water loop: Storm,D5,Silverprop Cyclone FusionHL, Coolingworks 32T
    My Stacker

  23. #498
    I am Xtreme
    Join Date
    Jul 2005
    Posts
    4,811
    Quote Originally Posted by Dainas View Post
    I love it how codemasters has to hide beneath a million post processing effects to cover for its shoddy visual work. Cannot wait to see some real DX11 titles though, and a few 20 page long 5xxx reviews

    Agreed, I noticed it right away and touched it a little just to see what would turn up.
    Photo 1 Before
    Photo 1 After



    Photo 3 After
    Photo 3 After

    I do hope they show before and after video detailing what's different. I recall the developer respond to a you tube video that DX11 version of this game would look better.
    Last edited by Eastcoasthandle; 09-11-2009 at 07:17 PM.
    [SIGPIC][/SIGPIC]

  24. #499
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2004
    Posts
    162
    People this is the dawn of a technology that can become mainstream at a consumer level. like any tech it takes time, but the door is now open.

  25. #500
    Xtreme Addict Chrono Detector's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2009
    Posts
    1,142
    Can't wait to see more benchmarks, reviews and pictures. The 5800 series sounds very promising.
    AMD Threadripper 12 core 1920x CPU OC at 4Ghz | ASUS ROG Zenith Extreme X399 motherboard | 32GB G.Skill Trident RGB 3200Mhz DDR4 RAM | Gigabyte 11GB GTX 1080 Ti Aorus Xtreme GPU | SilverStone Strider Platinum 1000W Power Supply | Crucial 1050GB MX300 SSD | 4TB Western Digital HDD | 60" Samsung JU7000 4K UHD TV at 3840x2160

Page 20 of 91 FirstFirst ... 10171819202122233070 ... LastLast

Bookmarks

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •