Page 12 of 19 FirstFirst ... 29101112131415 ... LastLast
Results 276 to 300 of 454

Thread: Radeon HD 5870 Six with 6 display outputs, prices, performance

  1. #276
    Banned
    Join Date
    Feb 2009
    Posts
    165
    You know what really makes me tingle? The moment Nvidia shows up with their $400+ cards, ATi will be dropping the 5870 to $299-350, and even lower as time goes by. Talk about getting bang for buck. A card as fast ( Or faster ) than the GTX295, for half the price, with MORE features.

    I'm not sure how Nvidia is going to top this. I highly doubt Nvidia's next-gen GTX380 is going to be more than 2x the performance of the GTX280. I just can't see it since they use such large chips. Going by rumoured specs, it looks like they're sticking with their large chips.

    Either way, this generation, we CUSTOMERS win! It's going to be a great gaming year this time around fellas.

  2. #277
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Posts
    1,176
    Quote Originally Posted by Jamesrt2004 View Post
    I love marketing :P

    250% hehe...
    Me too. I was a marketer during Uni.

    There's marketing and there's stating specs.
    One thing you learn early on is that black hat marketing doesn't fly in the courtroom.

    It's simple logical deduction.

    RV870 is based on the RV770 after all. High clockspeeds, more refined AA handling, 1600 shaders ....yeah

  3. #278
    Xtreme Guru
    Join Date
    Dec 2002
    Posts
    4,046
    one Q.. 2gb 5870 available @ launch ??

  4. #279
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    Jul 2009
    Location
    NY
    Posts
    225
    Quote Originally Posted by bladerash View Post
    lol wut?
    specs are out..

    and this might give u an idea about the benchmarks, though the HD5870 is overclocked:
    http://translate.google.nl/translate...a%3Dpage%253D1

    OMG its true , 5870 shreds a GTX 295 O.O for 400 $




    My Heatware
    Originally Posted by some guy on internet
    That's your problem right there. Just forget about how things look on paper as that's irrelevant.

  5. #280
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    Jul 2007
    Posts
    1,488
    Quote Originally Posted by Jowy Atreides View Post
    So you're saying that a card (taking flagship from the 4890) with nearly 3 teraflops processing power isn't going to be as fast as a 4890

    ..yeah

    playable fps in Dirt 2 at massive resolutions with all the details on is proof alone that there's no slouch here
    Of course I'm not foolish enough to believe that ATI would release a nextgen card with such low performance.

    But I can pretty much guarantee that there are people out there that saw the nordichardware article, thought "only 40% more then a 4870/90?" (even though that's not exactly what it said), and then felt a warming in their heart.

  6. #281
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Posts
    1,176
    Quote Originally Posted by Solus Corvus View Post
    Of course I'm not foolish enough to believe that ATI would release a nextgen card with such low performance.

    But I can pretty much guarantee that there are people out there that saw the nordichardware article, thought "only 40% more then a 4870/90?" (even though that's not exactly what it said), and then felt a warming in their heart.
    Oh, I thought you meant less performance than 25-40% but you meant nvidia fanboys hoping for that case.

    I stand corrected

  7. #282
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    Nov 2007
    Location
    Illinois
    Posts
    2,095
    It'll be a breath of fresh air to see the nvidiots cowering under the mud slinging from the ati-fanboys. I almost look forward to complete personality reversals as staunch defenders of the GT200 cower with their excuses of ... price/performance?
    E7200 @ 3.4 ; 7870 GHz 2 GB
    Intel's atom is a terrible chip.

  8. #283
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    Nov 2004
    Posts
    1,692
    Quote Originally Posted by Vit^pr0n View Post
    You know what really makes me tingle? The moment Nvidia shows up with their $400+ cards, ATi will be dropping the 5870 to $299-350, and even lower as time goes by. Talk about getting bang for buck. A card as fast ( Or faster ) than the GTX295, for half the price, with MORE features.

    I'm not sure how Nvidia is going to top this. I highly doubt Nvidia's next-gen GTX380 is going to be more than 2x the performance of the GTX280. I just can't see it since they use such large chips. Going by rumoured specs, it looks like they're sticking with their large chips.

    Either way, this generation, we CUSTOMERS win! It's going to be a great gaming year this time around fellas.
    These cards will last 4 years perfectely fine. If a 8800 GTX is still serving me well, imagine how these cards will do in years to come.

    Intel Core i7-3770K
    ASUS P8Z77-I DELUXE
    EVGA GTX 970 SC
    Corsair 16GB (2x8GB) Vengeance LP 1600
    Corsair H80
    120GB Samsung 840 EVO, 500GB WD Scorpio Blue, 1TB Samsung Spinpoint F3
    Corsair RM650
    Cooler Master Elite 120 Advanced
    OC: 5Ghz | +0.185 offset : 1.352v

  9. #284
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    Oct 2004
    Posts
    1,356
    Quote Originally Posted by cegras View Post
    It'll be a breath of fresh air to see the nvidiots cowering under the mud slinging from the ati-fanboys. I almost look forward to complete personality reversals as staunch defenders of the GT200 cower with their excuses of ... price/performance?


    I guess we'll really know for sure pretty soon who actually likes ATI and who just loves rooting for the underdog.

  10. #285
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Location
    Toon
    Posts
    1,570
    Quote Originally Posted by Jowy Atreides View Post
    ATI said it - 2.5 times the computational power.
    That's nearly 3 teraflops of brute power alone

    If it has 2.5 the specs of a 4870 then it's about 25% more powerful than the 4870x2
    Since the rumour said it has a 25-40% increase over the previous generation then it ties in perfectly with the 4870x2 comparison.
    I though they said 2.5 TFlops which is more like 220% or a little bit faster than my 4870x2. But double shaders at 4890 frequencies means 4890CF performance. Anyway, we'll see when the performance numbers come tomorrow :crosses fingers and toes:

    It would have been nice if they had fraps running in the HAWX video, 4870x2 plays that really well. It looked fluid but without knowing their settings it's hard to guess at performance levels.

    Awesome tech demo

    If we're taking sides here then I'll confess to owning a first gen 64MB Radeon ViVo, X800XL, 2 2900XT 512MBs, 2900XT 1GB DDR4, 4870 512, 4670 512MB & 4870x2 (triple slot monster variant) and only one high end nVidia: 8800GTS 512MB (before it got shrunk, renamed, twice and still didn't come close to my clocks). I liked the 8800GTS but I bought it because I couldn't get 2x3850 512MB at the time and killed it just before the 4870 came out. So you could probably say I actually like ATi, at a pinch.
    Last edited by initialised; 09-10-2009 at 04:39 PM.
    Intel i7 920 C0 @ 3.67GHz
    ASUS 6T Deluxe
    Powercolor 7970 @ 1050/1475
    12GB GSkill Ripjaws
    Antec 850W TruePower Quattro
    50" Full HD PDP
    Red Cosmos 1000

  11. #286
    Xtreme Mentor
    Join Date
    Jul 2004
    Posts
    3,247
    EDIT: Rumours - for comparision

    HD 5870 :
    • 850MHz/1200MHz
    • Idle: 26 watts
    • Peak: 190 watts
    • Price: 1GB $349/2GB $399
    • September 22-24

    HD 5850 :
    • 700MHz/1000MHz
    • Price: 1GB $299
    • September 22-24

    Quote Originally Posted by Fusion View Post




    http://forum.beyond3d.com/showthread...49120&page=103
    Last edited by onethreehill; 09-10-2009 at 04:56 PM.

  12. #287
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Aug 2009
    Location
    Australia
    Posts
    37
    Quote Originally Posted by Jowy Atreides View Post
    Aren't those 8800gts


    ...sorry, I mean 9800gtx ....9800gtx + cards ...not 280's?
    Yes, these are 9800GTX+ cards, but they share the same intake as the GTX280

    Quote Originally Posted by Oberon View Post
    The GTX280 does not use the same type of fan (axial) as ATI's coolers do (radial). Your experiment is flawed from the beginning. =P
    You mean centrifugal right, cause your wrong on both accounts, they both share a centrifugal blower design of radial type time for some experiments i think
    Last edited by crystogod; 09-10-2009 at 04:42 PM.

  13. #288
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Location
    Toon
    Posts
    1,570
    Quote Originally Posted by onethreehill View Post
    So it is double a RV770!

    Bring on the benchmarks.
    Intel i7 920 C0 @ 3.67GHz
    ASUS 6T Deluxe
    Powercolor 7970 @ 1050/1475
    12GB GSkill Ripjaws
    Antec 850W TruePower Quattro
    50" Full HD PDP
    Red Cosmos 1000

  14. #289
    Banned
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Location
    Canada
    Posts
    707
    Quote Originally Posted by Vit^pr0n View Post
    I'm not sure how Nvidia is going to top this. I highly doubt Nvidia's next-gen GTX380 is going to be more than 2x the performance of the GTX280. I just can't see it since they use such large chips. Going by rumoured specs, it looks like they're sticking with their large chips
    I have a feeling Nvidia will expand on their exclusive feature push for the 300 series. In other words, we will see significant % of silicon specifically designed for non gaming type applications (not sure exactly what they will be bringing new to the table) and of course will continue to push PhysX, 3D gaming etc.

    As for gaming performance, Nvidia is limited by TSMC just as AMD is on how many transistors they can pack into one die. Will Nvidia go for an insane transistor count, yields and cost be damned? I honestly don't know.

  15. #290
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Aug 2009
    Location
    Australia
    Posts
    37
    Quote Originally Posted by initialised View Post
    So it is double a RV770!

    Bring on the benchmarks.
    So it's a 4870x2 on a single die? with about 20% more speed on the Core?

  16. #291
    Banned
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Location
    Canada
    Posts
    707
    Quote Originally Posted by crystogod View Post
    So it's a 4870x2 on a single die?
    No.

  17. #292
    Xtreme Mentor
    Join Date
    Jul 2004
    Posts
    3,247
    Rumours:

    HD 5870 :
    • 850MHz/1200MHz
    • Idle: 26 watts
    • Peak: 190 watts
    • Price: 1GB $349/2GB $399
    • September 22-24

    HD 5850 :
    • 700MHz/1000MHz
    • Price: 1GB $299
    • September 22-24

  18. #293
    Xtreme Guru
    Join Date
    Dec 2002
    Posts
    4,046
    yay!!! ill definitely get a 5870

  19. #294
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Aug 2009
    Location
    Australia
    Posts
    37
    Quote Originally Posted by eleeter View Post
    No.
    I thought a 4870x2 was 2 x RV770, which is what seems the specs are on the 5870?

  20. #295
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Location
    Istantinople
    Posts
    1,574
    Do you think 2GB would be a worthy investment over 1GB at 1920x1080 resolution?
    Has anyone really been far even as decided to use even go want to do look more like?
    INTEL Core i7 920 // ASUS P6T Deluxe V2 // OCZ 3G1600 6GB // POWERCOLOR HD5970 // Cooler Master HAF 932 // Thermalright Ultra 120 Extreme // SAMSUNG T260 26"

  21. #296
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Aug 2009
    Location
    Australia
    Posts
    37
    Quote Originally Posted by annihilat0r View Post
    Do you think 2GB would be a worthy investment over 1GB at 1920x1080 resolution?
    If you running max eye candy, AA & AF it would help out.

  22. #297
    Banned
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Location
    Canada
    Posts
    707
    Quote Originally Posted by crystogod View Post
    I thought a 4870x2 was 2 x RV770, which is what seems the specs are on the 5870?
    In a very general sense yes, your statement would be correct. But the 5870 is not two 4870s glued together, or a side by side MCM design, or anything like that.

  23. #298
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Posts
    1,463
    Quote Originally Posted by annihilat0r View Post
    Do you think 2GB would be a worthy investment over 1GB at 1920x1080 resolution?
    Depends on if you like unnecessarilyy high texture settings like large view distances, custom texture-mods, increased texture-paks, and super stupid AA levels on stuff like crysis, GTAIV, ARMA & clearsky. IMO it will be hard to push the Vmem over 1024mb, I saw a review do it using gtaiv and large view distances, and with crysis custom texture mods...2GB only good for uber elite users, or those who want to keep using their 5870 well into future games with higher requirements.
    Bring... bring the amber lamps.
    [SIGPIC][/SIGPIC]

  24. #299
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Aug 2009
    Location
    Australia
    Posts
    37
    Quote Originally Posted by eleeter View Post
    In a very general sense yes, your statement would be correct. But the 5870 is not two 4870s glued together, or a side by side MCM design, or anything like that.
    Noo lol i must of made myself unclear, the power in the of the 4870x2 is found in the single core (die) of the 5870

  25. #300
    Banned
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Location
    Canada
    Posts
    707
    Quote Originally Posted by crystogod View Post
    Noo lol i must of made myself unclear, the power in the of the 4870x2 is found in the single core (die) of the 5870
    Ah okay. At least a 4870x2 without the limitations of Crossfire, plus other enhancements, DX11, and I'm sure a bunch of smaller stuff we don't know about yet.

Page 12 of 19 FirstFirst ... 29101112131415 ... LastLast

Bookmarks

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •