Particle's First Rule of Online Technical Discussion:
As a thread about any computer related subject has its length approach infinity, the likelihood and inevitability of a poorly constructed AMD vs. Intel fight also exponentially increases.
Rule 1A:
Likewise, the frequency of a car pseudoanalogy to explain a technical concept increases with thread length. This will make many people chuckle, as computer people are rarely knowledgeable about vehicular mechanics.
Rule 2:
When confronted with a post that is contrary to what a poster likes, believes, or most often wants to be correct, the poster will pick out only minor details that are largely irrelevant in an attempt to shut out the conflicting idea. The core of the post will be left alone since it isn't easy to contradict what the person is actually saying.
Rule 2A:
When a poster cannot properly refute a post they do not like (as described above), the poster will most likely invent fictitious counter-points and/or begin to attack the other's credibility in feeble ways that are dramatic but irrelevant. Do not underestimate this tactic, as in the online world this will sway many observers. Do not forget: Correctness is decided only by what is said last, the most loudly, or with greatest repetition.
Rule 3:
When it comes to computer news, 70% of Internet rumors are outright fabricated, 20% are inaccurate enough to simply be discarded, and about 10% are based in reality. Grains of salt--become familiar with them.
Remember: When debating online, everyone else is ALWAYS wrong if they do not agree with you!
Random Tip o' the Whatever
You just can't win. If your product offers feature A instead of B, people will moan how A is stupid and it didn't offer B. If your product offers B instead of A, they'll likewise complain and rant about how anyone's retarded cousin could figure out A is what the market wants.
At least the 2900 XT was priced competitively (8800 GTS 640MB). Nvidia's NV30 generation were all priced as if they were performance leaders.
But yes, R600 was a huge flop when you consider what it could've done and the hype prior to launch (320SP's, 512bit external ring bus, 1GB GDDR4 and etc).
Yes because R300, R400, R500 and RV7x0 were all uncompetitive--oh wait...if theres one thing I've learned about the ATI only crowd, its hope springs eternal. Always hoping to have a product that smashes nvidia the way the 9700pro did and then dancing like little school girls just because it competes.
Last edited by Wesker; 09-08-2009 at 05:45 PM.
Originally Posted by flippin_waffles on Intel's 32nm process and new process nodes
So, when the 5870 is going to be demonstrated in public?
If the only purpose of having 2900XT was running 3D Mark, than it was priced competitively. Seriously, Radeon 2000 were garbage.
It was a flop, not only because of the hype, but also because it arrived so late.But yes, R600 was a huge flop when you consider what it could've done and the hype prior to launch (320SP's, 512bit external ring bus, 1GB GDDR4 and etc).
IIRC, it was very competitive with the 8800 GTS (>=) without MSAA. Once you enabled MSAA, however, it got a little murky (<=). This wasn't helped by the terrible drivers at launch time (Again, IIRC, there were times when R580+ managed to outperform R600). I believe several key ATI employees came out saying that they wished drivers were in a much better shape for launch (one of which was Sir Eric Demers, a lead chip architect at ATI).
Massively oversized, a very leaky 80nm process, no hardware based MSAA resolve, premature drivers and a shortage of texture throughput was R600's undoing, IMO.
But the $399 price tag, included Black Box bundle and native sound over HDMI interface kept it from becoming a complete disaster.
EDIT: Changed Orange Box to Black Box.
Last edited by Wesker; 09-08-2009 at 09:28 PM.
Originally Posted by flippin_waffles on Intel's 32nm process and new process nodes
Come on already....where are the leaks???
I think the can of wuppass will come in at 2000 sps. haha, ok, well, maybe just hoping.![]()
[SIGPIC][/SIGPIC] The Obamanator!!!
GTX 480 Griddle Edition - Bit-Tech.net
Showing to millions in China and London, next USA ---
![]()
Wish someone in China would leak some info about the product already, anyone check chiphell lately for any new info?????
Originally Posted by motown_steve
Every genocide that was committed during the 20th century has been preceded by the disarmament of the target population. Once the government outlaws your guns your life becomes a luxury afforded to you by the state. You become a tool to benefit the state. Should you cease to benefit the state or even worse become an annoyance or even a hindrance to the state then your life becomes more trouble than it is worth.
Once the government outlaws your guns your life is forfeit. You're already dead, it's just a question of when they are going to get around to you.
What is this?
Last edited by rekleif; 09-08-2009 at 08:01 PM.
Originally Posted by motown_steve
Every genocide that was committed during the 20th century has been preceded by the disarmament of the target population. Once the government outlaws your guns your life becomes a luxury afforded to you by the state. You become a tool to benefit the state. Should you cease to benefit the state or even worse become an annoyance or even a hindrance to the state then your life becomes more trouble than it is worth.
Once the government outlaws your guns your life is forfeit. You're already dead, it's just a question of when they are going to get around to you.
Bookmarks