Results 1 to 25 of 2268

Thread: The ATI Radeon 5XXX Thread

Threaded View

  1. #10
    Xtreme Mentor
    Join Date
    Nov 2005
    Location
    Devon
    Posts
    3,437
    Quote Originally Posted by jaredpace View Post
    I don't think an HD5870 is going to be faster than a GTX295 on average - perhaps only in a few instances. Computerbase.de has some average performance ratings of the cards relative to the GTX295 based on averages from all the listed benchmarks. I expect 5870 to be 95-98% and 5850 to be 80-85% of a GTX295's overall performance (at this resolution). Less than one week away!

    ...
    I think equaling GTX295 shouldn't be a problem for 5870 specced as rumor says. Remember that for the first time in recent ATi history we are getting not only 2xShader count, 2xRBE but also 2xROP. All this on one die instead of 2 dies. On top of that better scheduler plus other tweaks will mean much better scaling compared to older 4870X2 (no CF overhead). The only limiting factor can be memory bandwidth in some cases.

    I'm looking forward to these new cards!


    EDIT:
    sayya you're typing too fast! We made same point in two different ways and two different posts :p
    Last edited by Lightman; 09-04-2009 at 12:25 AM.
    RiG1: Ryzen 7 1700 @4.0GHz 1.39V, Asus X370 Prime, G.Skill RipJaws 2x8GB 3200MHz CL14 Samsung B-die, TuL Vega 56 Stock, Samsung SS805 100GB SLC SDD (OS Drive) + 512GB Evo 850 SSD (2nd OS Drive) + 3TB Seagate + 1TB Seagate, BeQuiet PowerZone 1000W

    RiG2: HTPC AMD A10-7850K APU, 2x8GB Kingstone HyperX 2400C12, AsRock FM2A88M Extreme4+, 128GB SSD + 640GB Samsung 7200, LG Blu-ray Recorder, Thermaltake BACH, Hiper 4M880 880W PSU

    SmartPhone Samsung Galaxy S7 EDGE
    XBONE paired with 55'' Samsung LED 3D TV

Bookmarks

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •