MMM
Results 1 to 25 of 438

Thread: Hd5870 - $299

Hybrid View

  1. #1
    Xtreme Guru
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Posts
    3,562
    The problem with that logic is this: what happens if initial costs on a more complex product means that they can't stick to that pricing structure?

    In addition, we are talking actual costs to the consumer here as well. ATI and Nvidia love quoting SRPs to reviewers and consumers. How many times do we actually see those SRPs stick at the retail level? Very rarely, if ever for a new release.

    One way or another, I am anxious to see what becomes of pricing in this round.
    Last edited by SKYMTL; 08-25-2009 at 05:56 PM.

  2. #2
    Xtreme Enthusiast
    Join Date
    Aug 2008
    Posts
    577
    Quote Originally Posted by SKYMTL View Post
    The problem with that logic is this: what happens if initial costs on a more complex product means that they can't stick to that pricing structure?

    In addition, we are talking actual costs to the consumer here as well. ATI and Nvidia love quoting SRPs to reviewers and consumers. How many times do we actually see those SRPs stick at the retail level? Very rarely, if ever for a new release.

    One way or another, I am anxious to see what becomes of pricing in this round.
    That is the problem that Nvidia has with their larger GPUs as compared to AMD. Forcing them to sell at a lower profit margin due to higher costs. You can either stay at cost and lose market share, or take the profit hit and keep market share (which was what Nvidia did).

    That is why performance per mm2 is as important as performance per $$.

    Btw, AMD's is making a pretty healthy margin at 299 price point of a x870 card, the 299 is just the starting point for new products. As competition and yields get higher they reduce the price to increase market share further. They aren't stonewall stupid, they know some people wait to get a card to it reaches a certain price point, such as 200 for a x870 type card.

    AMD's position is market penetration over low penetration with high margins. As long as they can keep some advantage in die size vs performance they can keep this. Right now I personally think that AMD/ATI has this advantage getting GDDR5 and 55/40nm to the market first. Until either Nvidia leapfrogs ahead (hard to do that in manufacturing tech) or AMD screws up with a new process/technology AMD will prolly have this lead. If there is Nvidia can do is to not have any screw ups and see if they can beat out AMD in performance per mm2, then it won't matter if your chips cost a little more to produce as you will be able to charge more and have more leverage to dictate market prices/tempo.
    --Intel i5 3570k 4.4ghz (stock volts) - Corsair H100 - 6970 UL XFX 2GB - - Asrock Z77 Professional - 16GB Gskill 1866mhz - 2x90GB Agility 3 - WD640GB - 2xWD320GB - 2TB Samsung Spinpoint F4 - Audigy-- --NZXT Phantom - Samsung SATA DVD--(old systems Intel E8400 Wolfdale/Asus P45, AMD965BEC3 790X, Antec 180, Sapphire 4870 X2 (dead twice))

Bookmarks

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •