Amd Nvidia/Ati -3dmark06 scorebord revisted

[chew*]

Well thanks for busting my bubble....

I will take you at your word on the 5GHz thing since you obviously have way more experience than me. What should my expectations for these chips be, 4600-4800??

Ya I wish I had 2x 4870X2's instead of 4x 4870's, but they were not all purchased at the same time, so it just didn't work out that way. It is challenging to say the least with all of those cards.

29k doable about 4900+ Ben you scale about 1000 points give or take if your scaling NB and cpu 100 mhz until you hit about 6 gig then scaling kinda waivers.

chips avg from 4.6-4950 ish is the highest i've seen on DI, more than 2 cards costs a hit, I lost 50 mhz on the same chip from 2 gpu to 4 gpu from 4950 to 4900.

The MSI 790FX- GD70 is solid on DI, might want to give that a whirl, if anything can hit 30K on DI I think that would be the board........it's 100% solid for us on DI......i've only seen the deaths happen above 1.7v on ln2 and we ran one over 1.7v on ln2

Here's a rough Idea for you.

[Ben_Brown]

Thanks for the info chew*. The MSI 790FX-GD70 is exactly the board I am planning to get as soon as I sell my K9A2.

[equinox1]

24490 http://service.futuremark.com/compare?3dm06=11743791

cpu 5875
sm 2.0 8844
sm 3.0 13364

cpu at 4085 mhz
gpu at 778/950

not sure if i can pull off 25000 but i will keep trying. need better memory i think.

[chew*]

24490 http://service.futuremark.com/compare?3dm06=11743791

cpu 5875
sm 2.0 8844
sm 3.0 13364

cpu at 4085 mhz
gpu at 778/950

not sure if i can pull off 25000 but i will keep trying. need better memory i think.

memory gain you 50-100 points max.

[Titan7171]

new score 22,949 http://service.futuremark.com/compare?3dm06=11847900




cpu 5903
sm2 9050
sm3 11304

cpu: Phenom 2 965@ 4.2ghz
GC Sapphire 4850x2 2gb 700/1100

[pcnazz]

Please put my 3Dmark06 Score on our board . Thank you very much .

PH II X4 940 BE 3.912 MHz , ATI 4890 Duel CF 950/1100 MHz , AMD 9.7 Drivers


3DMark06 Score 22646 3DMarks
SM 2.0 Score 8502 Marks
SM 3.0 Score 11947 Marks
CPU Score 5502 Marks

[Jure_5]

I don't have pictures.

Ph II 955 @3800MHz
single BFG 8800GT 774/1890/2130 (Accelero S1)

3DMark Score 16555
SM 2.0 Score 6978
SM 3.0 Score 6610
CPU Score 5791

I think this is a very good score.

http://service.futuremark.com/compare?3dm06=11678345

[equinox1]

well maybe i can hit 25k

25099
sm 2.0 9117
sm 3.0 13740
cpu 5945


cpu at 4200 mhz on chilled water
http://service.futuremark.com/compare?3dm06=11895606

[msimax]

updated

[theoldtimer]

Total Score – 25,117
SM2.0 Score: 9,147
SM3.0 Score: 13,727
CPU Score: 5,949

AMD Phenom II 965be @ 4.24GHz
Gigabyte GA-MA790FXT-UD5P Mobo
4GB (2GBx2) DDR3 @ 1616MHz
2X ATI 4870X2’s CrossfireX @ 727/860
Catalyst 9.5 Windows 7 RC 32-bit


http://service.futuremark.com/compare?3dm06=11949668

[demonkevy666]

Total Score – 25,117
SM2.0 Score: 9,147
SM3.0 Score: 13,727
CPU Score: 5,949

AMD Phenom II 965be @ 4.24GHz
Gigabyte GA-MA790FXT-UD5P Mobo
4GB (2GBx2) DDR3 @ 1616MHz
2X ATI 4870X2’s CrossfireX @ 727/860
Catalyst 9.5 Windows 7 RC 32-bit


http://service.futuremark.com/compare?3dm06=11949668

I think you can get 6,000 cpu points.

up the NB to 2911mhz memory down a bit to half the NB speed 1455mhz tighten up the timings if you can.

or you can see if you can get that extra 100 mhz see if there any difference.

[VoodooProphetII]

3D Mark 06 - 29746
SM2.0 - 11608
SM3.0 - 14058
CPU - 8423

Setup
Phenom II 955 @ 5600 on LN2
2 x 1GB OCZ PC16000 DDR3 @ 1333 6 6 6 21 T1
MSI 790FX GD70 (A struggle, but working well)
Zotac GTX 295 @ 720 core linked shader and 1250 memory.

http://service.futuremark.com/compare?3dm06=11952429

[theoldtimer]

I think you can get 6,000 cpu points.

up the NB to 2911mhz memory down a bit to half the NB speed 1455mhz tighten up the timings if you can.

or you can see if you can get that extra 100 mhz see if there any difference.

I have tested at your suggested settings but possibly not during today’s tests, although I will check. The system sometimes scores 6K+ in the CPU tests but for whatever reason it didn’t during this test. I’ve tested using a lower multi and higher fsb to get close to the same clocks with the higher NB speed using the suggested memory settings but the test usually stops during the SM2.0 tests.

The problem I’m having is completing the HDR/SM3.0 tests at these clocks. I’ve tested for several days trying to find settings that would ease the stress on the entire system. As of today these setting are the only combination I have tried that completed the entire 3D06 run at these clocks. I finally resorted to lowering the default clocks on the GFX cards and then the HDR/SM3.0 tests completed.

Anyway, thanks for the suggestions. I’ll keep testing as there is undoubtedly many combinations that I haven’t tried.

[chew*]

3D Mark 06 - 29746
SM2.0 - 11608
SM3.0 - 14058
CPU - 8423

Setup
Phenom II 955 @ 5600 on LN2
2 x 1GB OCZ PC16000 DDR3 @ 1333 6 6 6 21 T1
MSI 790FX GD70 (A struggle, but working well)
Zotac GTX 295 @ 720 core linked shader and 1250 memory.

http://service.futuremark.com/compare?3dm06=11952429

Trying to make me break out a backup eh

[VoodooProphetII]

Chew* this was the highest I could manage 06 stable, and it was done with 1.688Vcore. I could run all the way up to 1.85 vcore but not even the higher vcore could help me get more speed out of all 4 cores. The new pot manage to keep temps between 191C and 185C. NB speed was 3400 to 3500, and higher just would not function....boot. So I will not be able to get any better results wich mean - your result will be safe.

[chew*]

Chew* this was the highest I could manage 06 stable, and it was done with 1.688Vcore. I could run all the way up to 1.85 vcore but not even the higher vcore could help me get more speed out of all 4 cores. The new pot manage to keep temps between 191C and 185C. NB speed was 3400 to 3500, and higher just would not function....boot. So I will not be able to get any better results wich mean - your result will be safe.

Its a top notch score man especially for nvidia.

I have been benching all week long thus my lack of attendance having some issues myself but they are minor at best.

Looking forward to benching MSI again myself.

Msimax and myself have a date with 3d03 4x 4890's and the MSI if he can ever get down here.

[VoodooProphetII]

Can't wait to see the 03 result. It is going to be great. Was benching a few hours ago with Vivi (as he broke the 01 single card record), and a couple other team members. I'm heading back there, and will then give the Gigabyte a go with Dice.

Oh and I saw what you meant regarding the condensation on the GD70. I used art eraser and toilet paper and it worked, but there was still ice underneath the PMW heat sink. Well not underneath, but just below, and against the caps.

[chew*]

Can't wait to see the 03 result. It is going to be great. Was benching a few hours ago with Vivi (as he broke the 01 single card record), and a couple other team members. I'm heading back there, and will then give the Gigabyte a go with Dice.

Oh and I saw what you meant regarding the condensation on the GD70. I used art eraser and toilet paper and it worked, but there was still ice underneath the PMW heat sink. Well not underneath, but just below, and against the caps.

Yep watch out for that if the condensation reaches those 5 chips its certain death to board and CPU.

[msimax]

updated

nice to see nvidia results

[OpTiX]

http://service.futuremark.com/compare?3dm06=11934805

not bad ...

[equinox1]

25107
sm 2.0 9044
sm 3.0 13758
cpu 5996
http://service.futuremark.com/compare?3dm06=11969651

cpu at 4240 mhz, need to get colder.

theoldtimer, nice score but im going to catch you.

[theoldtimer]

25107
sm 2.0 9044
sm 3.0 13758
cpu 5996
http://service.futuremark.com/compare?3dm06=11969651

cpu at 4240 mhz, need to get colder.

theoldtimer, nice score but im going to catch you.

Hey equinox1, you have any trouble completing the HDR/SM3.0 part of 3DMark06 or do you have problems with one of the other parts? This 965 will run the SM2.0 and CPU tests @4.28GHz but doesn’t really want more than 4.18 to 4.2GHz in the HDR/3.0 tests. I usually run into trouble in the CPU tests but not with this chip. I must be overlooking something? Anyway I hope you do top my score that way I have something to shoot for.

[chew*]

Hey equinox1, you have any trouble completing the HDR/SM3.0 part of 3DMark06 or do you have problems with one of the other parts? This 965 will run the SM2.0 and CPU tests @4.28GHz but doesn’t really want more than 4.18 to 4.2GHz in the HDR/3.0 tests. I usually run into trouble in the CPU tests but not with this chip. I must be overlooking something? Anyway I hope you do top my score that way I have something to shoot for.

Your ram.

[theoldtimer]

Thanks for the suggestion chew, I'll tune on it some more.

[equinox1]

Hey equinox1, you have any trouble completing the HDR/SM3.0 part of 3DMark06 or do you have problems with one of the other parts? This 965 will run the SM2.0 and CPU tests @4.28GHz but doesn’t really want more than 4.18 to 4.2GHz in the HDR/3.0 tests. I usually run into trouble in the CPU tests but not with this chip. I must be overlooking something? Anyway I hope you do top my score that way I have something to shoot for.

ive been struggling with the cpu test #2. i also am suspect of my ram.
i have ocz platinums but they are the 1.9 volt variety. i am getting a low volt amd kit soon. maybe that will help for a bit more.