MMM
Page 11 of 13 FirstFirst ... 8910111213 LastLast
Results 251 to 275 of 316

Thread: AMD DX11 RV8xx Card Exposed

  1. #251
    Xtreme Mentor
    Join Date
    Sep 2007
    Location
    Ohio
    Posts
    2,977
    Quote Originally Posted by LordEC911 View Post
    Actually the card is Juniper XT and like I said, should be around 4870/4890 performance at a "nice" price.
    We need a best guess listing, to keep the various cards performance straight.
    Asus Maximus SE X38 / Lapped Q6600 G0 @ 3.8GHz (L726B397 stock VID=1.224) / 7 Ultimate x64 /EVGA GTX 295 C=650 S=1512 M=1188 (Graphics)/ EVGA GTX 280 C=756 S=1512 M=1296 (PhysX)/ G.SKILL 8GB (4 x 2GB) SDRAM DDR2 1000 (PC2 8000) / Gateway FPD2485W (1920 x 1200 res) / Toughpower 1,000-Watt modular PSU / SilverStone TJ-09 BW / (2) 150 GB Raptor's RAID-0 / (1) Western Digital Caviar 750 GB / LG GGC-H20L (CD, DVD, HD-DVD, and BlueRay Drive) / WaterKegIII Xtreme / D-TEK FuZion CPU, EVGA Hydro Copper 16 GPU, and EK NB S-MAX Acetal Waterblocks / Enzotech Forged Copper CNB-S1L (South Bridge heat sink)

  2. #252
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Posts
    1,463
    Quote Originally Posted by LordEC911 View Post
    Actually the card is Juniper XT and like I said, should be around 4870/4890 performance at a "nice" price.
    Yah but hes saying equivalent... which would be Cedar.

    I agree it's juniper, but thats not the equivalent of the 4850 in the 4xxx series. And yes Juniper (the card pictured) performs like a 4870.
    Bring... bring the amber lamps.
    [SIGPIC][/SIGPIC]

  3. #253
    I am Xtreme
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Posts
    7,750
    Quote Originally Posted by jaredpace View Post
    And yes Juniper (the card pictured) performs like a 4870.
    how well does it OC?

  4. #254
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Posts
    1,463
    Quote Originally Posted by Manicdan View Post
    how well does it OC?
    heh, got me. I'm just going by Cj's vantage run of P9500 compared to a 48701g of P9800... No idea of the clockspeeds or OC headroom. Probably know for sure in 3 weeks though
    Bring... bring the amber lamps.
    [SIGPIC][/SIGPIC]

  5. #255
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Posts
    2,125
    All he's saying is that price wise, it's equivalent to a 47xx type card, but performance wise, expect it to be a 4870-4890 performer

    Looks like the leaks are coming in!

  6. #256
    Xtreme Guru
    Join Date
    Jan 2005
    Location
    Tre, Suomi Finland
    Posts
    3,858
    I'd say the way HD4770 OCs is a good way pointer for other 40nm chips too. They say TSMC 40nm is Black Diamond 2, and 130nm version of it was nice...
    You were not supposed to see this.

  7. #257
    Registered User
    Join Date
    May 2009
    Location
    Hyderabad, India
    Posts
    68
    Quote Originally Posted by LordEC911 View Post
    Actually the card is Juniper XT and like I said, should be around 4870/4890 performance at a "nice" price.
    More like HD4850 OC or GTS 250.

  8. #258
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Posts
    2,462
    Quote Originally Posted by largon View Post
    They say TSMC 40nm is Black Diamond 2, and 130nm version of it was nice...
    This sentence was very confusing at first. This is what I was missing:
    Quote Originally Posted by Wikipedia.org
    Black Diamond and Black Diamond II, a low-κ material developed by Applied Materials used in semiconductor manufacturing
    Notice any grammar or spelling mistakes? Feel free to correct me! Thanks

  9. #259
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Jul 2009
    Location
    Switzerland
    Posts
    52
    i'm seriously looking forward for these cards ! my 8800 gts 512 needs to get some rest
    Q6600 (VID : 1.325v ) || P5Q PRO || 3GB Corsair || 8800 GTS 512 || 1.5 TB HDD || Thermaltake 550W || Antec 900 || Logitech G15 || Logitech G3 || Pioneer HDJ-1000 Headphones || Razer mousepad

    WaterCooling System:
    MCP 655 || XSPC 360 Rad || HeatKiller 3.0 Cu || 3 x NoiseBlock BlackSilentFan XL2 rev 3.0 || and some tubes/fittings etc

  10. #260
    Xtreme Enthusiast
    Join Date
    Dec 2004
    Location
    Singapore
    Posts
    639
    Quote Originally Posted by blindbox
    Just want to share with you guys.
    Sounds about right. Thats a few days before Windows 7 goes retail. According to what AMD/ATI had in mind. As for the rest of the lineup:

    The Earlier the merrier.....
    | Intel Core i5 2500K | Asrock P67 Extreme 6 | Gskill Ripjaws 8GB CL7 |

    | Sapphire HD6970 | Creative X-Fi modded | Corsair HX850 | Corsair H60 |



  11. #261
    Xtreme Guru
    Join Date
    Jan 2005
    Location
    Tre, Suomi Finland
    Posts
    3,858
    I wonder if AMD finally fixed their power guzzling, freq-transition-flickering GDDR5 controller. The scary thing is, RV770 had the issue from get-go, and they didn't fix it in RV740, nor in RV790. That's 3 chips in a row with an issue that alone blows the idle power consumption sky high...
    You were not supposed to see this.

  12. #262
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    Oct 2004
    Posts
    171
    Quote Originally Posted by largon View Post
    I wonder if AMD finally fixed their power guzzling, freq-transition-flickering GDDR5 controller. The scary thing is, RV770 had the issue from get-go, and they didn't fix it in RV740, nor in RV790. That's 3 chips in a row with an issue that alone blows the idle power consumption sky high...
    Hope they fixed the idle power consumption. Otherwise I'll wait for Nvidia.

  13. #263
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Oct 2007
    Location
    Europe
    Posts
    38
    Quote Originally Posted by largon View Post
    I wonder if AMD finally fixed their power guzzling, freq-transition-flickering GDDR5 controller. The scary thing is, RV770 had the issue from get-go, and they didn't fix it in RV740, nor in RV790. That's 3 chips in a row with an issue that alone blows the idle power consumption sky high...
    I really hope for it too. I understand the high load p.c., but the idle p.c. is madness...

  14. #264
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    Jul 2009
    Location
    NY
    Posts
    225
    4890 idle power consumption is lower then GTX260 and lower then 4870 idle and load , they refined the design before putting it on the 40nm .

  15. #265
    Xtreme Guru
    Join Date
    Jan 2005
    Location
    Tre, Suomi Finland
    Posts
    3,858
    ^GTX260 216 idles at ~40W lower than HD4890. All because GDDR5 is not downclocked, resulting in crazy idle current draw for the MEMI/O.
    Last edited by largon; 08-21-2009 at 10:32 AM.
    You were not supposed to see this.

  16. #266
    Banned
    Join Date
    Jun 2008
    Location
    Mi
    Posts
    1,063
    Quote Originally Posted by spursindonesia View Post
    While 512 bit buswidth is rather out of question, wouldn't it be so sweet if Cypress was equipped with 384 bit buswidth, if it comes as a 360 mm^2 chip, i think it wouldn't be pad limited. Just imagine, a 360 mm^2 chip with 1920 SPs, 96 TMUs, 36 RBEs on 384 bit buswidth (6 RBEs per 64 bit mem controller) using 1.5 GB of 1.2 GHz GDDR5 chips, greatness !!



    I just put that^^ in my pipe and smoked it... I'll have to tell ya, it was very tasty!


    I'll take two more please!

  17. #267
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    Oct 2007
    Location
    Chicago,Illinois
    Posts
    1,182
    1.2 GHZ CORE and 2GB MEM @ 1.2GHZ.



  18. #268
    Xtreme Guru
    Join Date
    Jan 2005
    Location
    Tre, Suomi Finland
    Posts
    3,858
    ^Huh?
    Not gonna happen.
    You were not supposed to see this.

  19. #269
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    Jul 2009
    Location
    NY
    Posts
    225
    Quote Originally Posted by largon View Post
    ^GTX260 216 idles at ~40W lower than HD4890. All because GDDR5 is not downclocked, resulting in crazy idle current draw for the MEMI/O.

    Xbit labs show a different story they measure at the card and its somewhat consistent with other reviews i saw .But am not sure who to believe .

  20. #270
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    Jun 2007
    Posts
    226
    I just changed my idle clocks on the hd4870x2 to 300 core and ram and turned catalyst ai to off to run in single core mode. All good.
    MSI P67 GD65 B3
    2500k 4.8
    GTX480 835/1650/2000
    8gb ram
    Win7

  21. #271
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Jul 2009
    Location
    Switzerland
    Posts
    52
    is that dynamic ? i mean, do you have to enable the "crossfire" again manually + the clocks each time you want to play or not ? if not, sounds like a good deal !
    Q6600 (VID : 1.325v ) || P5Q PRO || 3GB Corsair || 8800 GTS 512 || 1.5 TB HDD || Thermaltake 550W || Antec 900 || Logitech G15 || Logitech G3 || Pioneer HDJ-1000 Headphones || Razer mousepad

    WaterCooling System:
    MCP 655 || XSPC 360 Rad || HeatKiller 3.0 Cu || 3 x NoiseBlock BlackSilentFan XL2 rev 3.0 || and some tubes/fittings etc

  22. #272
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2009
    Posts
    278
    its getting close to launch and no specs yet, i think this might be a paper launch, lets hope not, cross your fingers.

  23. #273
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    Oct 2007
    Posts
    464
    Please note that the benchmark results will be known around two weeks after the product launch, in order to give enough time for paper magazines and partners to fill in the stocks world-wide. Just like the Radeon 4800 series, Evergreen hardware will be available world-wide at the same time [this time around, late September - around 24th].
    http://www.brightsideofnews.com/news...t-carrier.aspx

  24. #274
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    Mar 2006
    Location
    Saskatchewan, Canada
    Posts
    2,207
    Quote Originally Posted by ~CS~ View Post
    Xbit labs show a different story they measure at the card and its somewhat consistent with other reviews i saw .But am not sure who to believe .
    Show me other review that show that? Xbit is the only place with such results.

    Along with tech power up, anandtech, hardwarecanucks and guru3d, I think they all show the 48xx with ddr5 eating lots of power during idle.

  25. #275
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Posts
    2,462
    Quote Originally Posted by tajoh111 View Post
    Show me other review that show that? Xbit is the only place with such results.

    Along with tech power up, anandtech, hardwarecanucks and guru3d, I think they all show the 48xx with ddr5 eating lots of power during idle.
    You could easily see that when downclocking the RAM manually in idle. Yes, the GDDR5 eats a lot of energy while doing barely anything...

    So, I sure as hell hope as well that AMD fixes this

    Quote Originally Posted by Wh!te Sh4dow View Post
    is that dynamic ? i mean, do you have to enable the "crossfire" again manually + the clocks each time you want to play or not ? if not, sounds like a good deal !
    You could do that "kind of" automatically with Rivatuner, at elast there you can set different clocks for 2D and 3D Dunno about CF though.

    Here's a thread about that (in german), I'm quite sure there's something like that in english forums
    http://www.hardwareluxx.de/community...d.php?t=528358
    Last edited by FischOderAal; 08-22-2009 at 01:28 AM.
    Notice any grammar or spelling mistakes? Feel free to correct me! Thanks

Page 11 of 13 FirstFirst ... 8910111213 LastLast

Bookmarks

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •