Sell them to Fidel CastroOriginally Posted by NBF
*walks away from thread slowly*
Sell them to Fidel Castro
SweClockers.com
CPU: Phenom II X4 955BE
Clock: 4200MHz 1.4375v
Memory: Dominator GT 2x2GB 1600MHz 6-6-6-20 1.65v
Motherboard: ASUS Crosshair IV Formula
GPU: HD 5770
well i think the Cubans are relay dying for an upgrade
They'll probably bin them as low-clocked DP server chips.
Main Machine:
AMD FX8350 @ stock --- 16 GB DDR3 @ 1333 MHz --- Asus M5A99FX Pro R2.0 --- 2.0 TB Seagate
Miscellaneous Workstations for Code-Testing:
Intel Core i7 4770K @ 4.0 GHz --- 32 GB DDR3 @ 1866 MHz --- Asus Z87-Plus --- 1.5 TB (boot) --- 4 x 1 TB + 4 x 2 TB (swap)
which is all not relevant, cause its only EE for desktop users... did you ever see that intel markets the EE for mainstream?I smell the desktop market at best being ignored at worst being sucked in by dishonest marketing spruiking the great advantages Hex Core will bring to desktop users.
Such a terrible waste.
Even better than benchmarks would be applications that most people use that could benefit by the extra cores that come at the sacrifice of clockspeed.
Oh well, 3% of users should be happy.
cinebench results look sketchy.
omg, omg.....impressive devilCPU
ROG Power PCs - Intel and AMD
CPUs:i9-7900X, i9-9900K, i7-6950X, i7-5960X, i7-8086K, i7-8700K, 4x i7-7700K, i3-7350K, 2x i7-6700K, i5-6600K, R7-2700X, 4x R5 2600X, R5 2400G, R3 1200, R7-1800X, R7-1700X, 3x AMD FX-9590, 1x AMD FX-9370, 4x AMD FX-8350,1x AMD FX-8320,1x AMD FX-8300, 2x AMD FX-6300,2x AMD FX-4300, 3x AMD FX-8150, 2x AMD FX-8120 125 and 95W, AMD X2 555 BE, AMD x4 965 BE C2 and C3, AMD X4 970 BE, AMD x4 975 BE, AMD x4 980 BE, AMD X6 1090T BE, AMD X6 1100T BE, A10-7870K, Athlon 845, Athlon 860K,AMD A10-7850K, AMD A10-6800K, A8-6600K, 2x AMD A10-5800K, AMD A10-5600K, AMD A8-3850, AMD A8-3870K, 2x AMD A64 3000+, AMD 64+ X2 4600+ EE, Intel i7-980X, Intel i7-2600K, Intel i7-3770K,2x i7-4770K, Intel i7-3930KAMD Cinebench R10 challenge AMD Cinebench R15 thread Intel Cinebench R15 thread
Are those temperature/consumption tests against a C0 or a D0 i7 920? That is the question.
Does anyone know where i can find a CPUZ of a Istanbul hex core maybe a 2435 ??
Last edited by ajaidev; 08-10-2009 at 10:31 AM.
![Send a message via AIM to [XC] gomeler](images/misc/im_aim.gif)
When do these chips hit the shelves? ~Feb 2010?
looks like Intels 32nm process is a winner.
I can give you a CPU-Z of a 2427 if you want.
Particle's First Rule of Online Technical Discussion:
As a thread about any computer related subject has its length approach infinity, the likelihood and inevitability of a poorly constructed AMD vs. Intel fight also exponentially increases.
Rule 1A:
Likewise, the frequency of a car pseudoanalogy to explain a technical concept increases with thread length. This will make many people chuckle, as computer people are rarely knowledgeable about vehicular mechanics.
Rule 2:
When confronted with a post that is contrary to what a poster likes, believes, or most often wants to be correct, the poster will pick out only minor details that are largely irrelevant in an attempt to shut out the conflicting idea. The core of the post will be left alone since it isn't easy to contradict what the person is actually saying.
Rule 2A:
When a poster cannot properly refute a post they do not like (as described above), the poster will most likely invent fictitious counter-points and/or begin to attack the other's credibility in feeble ways that are dramatic but irrelevant. Do not underestimate this tactic, as in the online world this will sway many observers. Do not forget: Correctness is decided only by what is said last, the most loudly, or with greatest repetition.
Rule 3:
When it comes to computer news, 70% of Internet rumors are outright fabricated, 20% are inaccurate enough to simply be discarded, and about 10% are based in reality. Grains of salt--become familiar with them.
Remember: When debating online, everyone else is ALWAYS wrong if they do not agree with you!
Random Tip o' the Whatever
You just can't win. If your product offers feature A instead of B, people will moan how A is stupid and it didn't offer B. If your product offers B instead of A, they'll likewise complain and rant about how anyone's retarded cousin could figure out A is what the market wants.
Thanks Mr. Face
This means that a 4core/8thread 32nm should consume about 106W which is a good drop from the 163W needed for 45nm, That would be some of the best reductions a shrink has ever yielded.
And in Q4 2010 or Q1 2011 we may even get the chance to buy one.
LOL he is using an iron as a mouse!well i think the Cubans are relay dying for an upgrade
That is what the lack of competition gets you.And in Q4 2010 or Q1 2011 we may even get the chance to buy one.
Nice Avatar... how many Intel chips do you own?And in Q4 2010 or Q1 2011 we may even get the chance to buy one.
since when did a bloomfield consume 163W?
Exactly my thought.
In this review? The one the thread is about.
Zero.
I am currently AMD Powered.
It's system power consumption, using low power components (gts 210)
they will be cheaper and will be released alot sooner if AMD is offing something that can compete with it...And in Q4 2010 or Q1 2011 we may even get the chance to buy one.
btw when is the next 32nm AMD CPU coming?
and how well it will do Vs i7 32nm?
Will do....
From a CB10 run a while back--ignore voltage (it's actually 1.225V):
As a thread about any computer related subject has its length approach infinity, the likelihood and inevitability of a poorly constructed AMD vs. Intel fight also exponentially increases.
Likewise, the frequency of a car pseudoanalogy to explain a technical concept increases with thread length. This will make many people chuckle, as computer people are rarely knowledgeable about vehicular mechanics.
When confronted with a post that is contrary to what a poster likes, believes, or most often wants to be correct, the poster will pick out only minor details that are largely irrelevant in an attempt to shut out the conflicting idea. The core of the post will be left alone since it isn't easy to contradict what the person is actually saying.
When a poster cannot properly refute a post they do not like (as described above), the poster will most likely invent fictitious counter-points and/or begin to attack the other's credibility in feeble ways that are dramatic but irrelevant. Do not underestimate this tactic, as in the online world this will sway many observers. Do not forget: Correctness is decided only by what is said last, the most loudly, or with greatest repetition.
When it comes to computer news, 70% of Internet rumors are outright fabricated, 20% are inaccurate enough to simply be discarded, and about 10% are based in reality. Grains of salt--become familiar with them.
Remember: When debating online, everyone else is ALWAYS wrong if they do not agree with you!
Random Tip o' the Whatever
You just can't win. If your product offers feature A instead of B, people will moan how A is stupid and it didn't offer B. If your product offers B instead of A, they'll likewise complain and rant about how anyone's retarded cousin could figure out A is what the market wants.
Posting Permissions
Reply With Quote
Bookmarks