OK so I guess Napalm has already addressed this but I wanted to post my results anyway.
This is a rather unscientific test but perhaps a useful compare none the less.
In the first set of tests I copied a single 5.13GB image file from one Mtron array to another Mtron array.
In the 2nd set of tests I copied a 4.84GB folder of 6967 items from one Mtron array to another Mtron array.
In the 3rd set of tests I copied the same single 5.13GB image file from one Acard 9010 array to another Acard 9010 array.
In the 4rth set of tests I copied the same 4.84GB folder of 6967 items from one Acard array to another Acard 9010 array.
Each array is set up exactly the same: 2xR0, primary, NTFS, "Turn off Windows write-cache buffer flushing ..." set to on.
All ICH10R arrays are set to 128 stripe size.
All 1231ML arrays are set to 64 stripe size.
In these tests it appears the 1231ML arrays were nominally twice as fast as the ICH10R arrays.
Interesting that moving from the slower Mtron Mobi’s to the faster Acard 9010’s the increase in performance of the 1231ML over the ICH10R arrays remains substantial.
Also interesting to note the large difference in the ICH10R tests.
Take a look at the table.
In the initial copy test - the time was always lowest - then with a "delete and recopy back" to the original drive it takes almost twice as long - curious.
You can see this in both the single and multiple file copy test, both for the Mtron’s and for the Acard’s.
Looking at the 4.84GB folder copies on the1231ML, this might actually work the other way here, the first copy took the longest time and the second and third seemed to take less time.
Table of test results is as follows –
Various benchmarks of each set of arrays –
2xMtron Mobi 3000 R0 ICH10R –
2xMtron Mobi 3000 R0 1231ML-2G –
2xAcard 9010 R0 ICH10R –
2xAcard 9010 R0 1231ML-2G –
Reply With Quote
Originally Posted by LexDiamonds
Bookmarks