Results 1 to 25 of 4708

Thread: X48 Rampage Formula Preview.

Hybrid View

  1. #1
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Oct 2008
    Posts
    75
    Thanks again Ghostleader. I think I'll go for a Sapphire Vapor-X 4890. I figured I could always use my 8800GT for physx should the need arise. I can't find the toxic/atomic versions in stock anywhere, just the regular vapor-x which I expect will perform adequately (I know it doesn't support software voltage control but I'm not really bothered with that).

  2. #2
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    Mar 2008
    Location
    Sweden
    Posts
    365
    Quote Originally Posted by Armored_Kech1 View Post
    Thanks again Ghostleader. I think I'll go for a Sapphire Vapor-X 4890. I figured I could always use my 8800GT for physx should the need arise. I can't find the toxic/atomic versions in stock anywhere, just the regular vapor-x which I expect will perform adequately (I know it doesn't support software voltage control but I'm not really bothered with that).
    Nice choice, an other awesome piece of machinery from Sapphire.

    Sorry guys for the , better get back before someone us.

    Armored_Kech1, what kind of cooler did you get for the NB?


    Quote Originally Posted by kuebk View Post
    I would rather say that 4870x2 increased temps near mch so you had to increase it's voltage.
    Donīt think so, I cool the MCH with water, never over 35C.
    Last edited by Ghostleader; 08-04-2009 at 10:15 AM.
    Asus P8Z68 Deluxe / i7 2600K / 2x4GB G.Skill RipjawsX 1600C8 / EVGA GTX 580 SC SLI

    Asus Crosshair V Formula-Z / FX8350 / G.Skill TridentX 2400C10 / GTX690

  3. #3
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Location
    Ostend - Belgium
    Posts
    1,253
    Quote Originally Posted by Ghostleader View Post
    Donīt think so, I cool the MCH with water, never over 35C.
    I think that a voltage raise of 0.02V or 0.04V isn't actually a voltage raise. There's a good chance that if you stress these GFX cards that the load on the PSU makes the voltage drop a bit on the NB and needs to compensate with one or two steps higher voltage in the BIOS.

  4. #4
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    Mar 2008
    Location
    Sweden
    Posts
    365
    Quote Originally Posted by A-Grey View Post
    I think that a voltage raise of 0.02V or 0.04V isn't actually a voltage raise. There's a good chance that if you stress these GFX cards that the load on the PSU makes the voltage drop a bit on the NB and needs to compensate with one or two steps higher voltage in the BIOS.
    Could be, could be but I think that my Thermaltake Toughpower 1000W can handle that stress though and I still believe that the data throughput that Crysis produce is more then Prime95 or LinX can produce and therefore I have to increase the volt.

    Also when I benchmark Crysis my water temp (only CPU and MCH under water, GFX stock air) increases by 2-3C if I compare it with LinX (max problem size, max memory use) even though the CPU temp is lower with Crysis then with LinX.

    Go figure
    Asus P8Z68 Deluxe / i7 2600K / 2x4GB G.Skill RipjawsX 1600C8 / EVGA GTX 580 SC SLI

    Asus Crosshair V Formula-Z / FX8350 / G.Skill TridentX 2400C10 / GTX690

  5. #5
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Location
    Ostend - Belgium
    Posts
    1,253
    Quote Originally Posted by Ghostleader View Post
    Could be, could be but I think that my Thermaltake Toughpower 1000W can handle that stress though and I still believe that the data throughput that Crysis produce is more then Prime95 or LinX can produce and therefore I have to increase the volt.

    Also when I benchmark Crysis my water temp (only CPU and MCH under water, GFX stock air) increases by 2-3C if I compare it with LinX (max problem size, max memory use) even though the CPU temp is lower with Crysis then with LinX.

    Go figure
    You are right. Crysis is probably producing more data throughput.

    Are you using your E8600 CPU? That could make sense.

    If you use your Q9650 the data throughput is going to be twice that high for the same CPU speed.

  6. #6
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    Mar 2008
    Location
    Sweden
    Posts
    365

    ASUS Rampage Formula BIOS 0902 / E8600 / 4x2 OCZ Blade PC-9600 / Sapphire HD 4870x2

    Quote Originally Posted by A-Grey View Post
    You are right. Crysis is probably producing more data throughput.

    Are you using your E8600 CPU? That could make sense.

    If you use your Q9650 the data throughput is going to be twice that high for the same CPU speed.
    Itīs with my E8600.

    Gonna test later with my Q9650, 4x2 Blades and those Sapphire Toxic HD 4890 in Crossfire, it gonna be a tough test for the RF, looking forward to it.


    Right know I have done some test with the following gear:

    ASUS Rampage Formula BIOS 0902 / E8600 / 4x2 OCZ Blade PC-9600 / Sapphire HD 4870x2 with Windows 7 RC 64bit.

    I canīt make 4x2 of those Blades stable @ 1200MHz with 1,80, they need ~1,85 (1,84 set in bios), if I run 2x2 thereīs no problem with 1,80 though.

    Couldnīt go lower then 1,55v through the MCH to have it stable.


    Hereīs some screenies with my E8600@500 4,25GHz and 4x2 OCZ Blade PC-9600@1200 555 15 tRD7 Strong.

    ~5 hrs P95 blend (4x1600mb)
    ~5 hrs LinX (25 loop, max problem size and max memory use)
    ~5 hrs HCI Design Memtest (~500% with 8x900mb)
    ~3,5 hrs Crysis Benchmark Tool Assualt Harbor 90 loop

    Stable enough for my.





    Oh yes, she made it through all 25





    Last edited by Ghostleader; 08-06-2009 at 03:48 AM. Reason: Added Crysis Benchmark
    Asus P8Z68 Deluxe / i7 2600K / 2x4GB G.Skill RipjawsX 1600C8 / EVGA GTX 580 SC SLI

    Asus Crosshair V Formula-Z / FX8350 / G.Skill TridentX 2400C10 / GTX690

Bookmarks

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •