MMM
Results 1 to 25 of 28

Thread: NVIDIA PhysX in Games [Review and Tests]

Threaded View

  1. #5
    Xtreme Guru
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Location
    Finland
    Posts
    4,308
    Err, of course PhysX means games will run slower than not utilizing it at all but what PhysX on GPU's purpose is to do this way faster than CPU would. UT3 gets over 200% performance increase with PhysX enabled on GPU on the PhysX enabled maps, a matter of playable and not playable scenario's on 95%+ of computers.

    What I've seen so far is the efficiency of using PhysX on GPU is very good even on today's cards, now the next nvidia chip will most likely have even better PhysX-capabilities.

    Would be of course better if you'd be able to efficiently do it with the CPU but I don't think physics on CPU will be a good move before we get Larrabee-like CPUs with really many cpu cores, but even then it will probably be more difficult to maintain a physics code for so many CPU cores, unless they'd come up with a groundbreaking multithreaded code in the API.
    Last edited by RPGWiZaRD; 07-27-2009 at 11:54 PM.
    Intel? Core i5-4670K @ 4.3 GHz | ASRock Extreme6 Z87 | G.Skill Sniper 2x8GB @ DDR4-1866 CL9 | Gigabyte GTX 970 OC Windforce 3x | Super Flower Titanium 1000W | ViewSonic VX2268wm 120Hz LCD | Phanteks PH-TC14PE | Logitech MX-518 | Win 7 x64 Professional | Samsung 850 EVO & 840 Pro SSDs

    If all people would share opinions in an objective manner, the world would be a friendlier place

Bookmarks

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •