Quote Originally Posted by millertime359 View Post
Yes, the review could have been done better. Skinnee did us all a favor by pushing this reveiw ahead of every other one he had and pushed to get us the data as fast as he could. He even admitted that he had issues figure out the best way to test it

You have to remember something though, this is something new. There is only one other product on the market atm that is comparable to this that I have seen. The XSPC dual bay res for the DDCs.

Vapor has also confirmed Skinnee's findings with math too. Norris also has confirmed that temps are similar to a true dual loop.

I do agree that there was alot of hype around this product, and there is a need to do some further testing. I also agree that you more than likely not get 10 degrees from your loop by installing it.

So lets stop with the bashing of it. If you get one, post your results. If your not going to get one, then lets leave it at that.
I never have bashed the product itself. It appears to do what it was designed to do. I've also never questioned skinnee's numbers, just the way in which they were presented and/or omitted.

I also can sympathize with skinnee to a small extent. While bastardizing his graphics, I saw first hand how difficult it is to appropriately compare the T3 to other comparable offerings, since, honestly there aren't any.

The test loop bar graphs are on the right track, but as I've stated before, I still feel they are misleading.

I'm curious if a stock pump was run on any of the test loops. Using that as a baseline, one could then chart the % of flow improvement of the D5, Detroit, and T3 in a serial configuration, and then also include the % flow improvement of separate loop sections when the T3 was set up in a parallel config.

I think this would give a much more "real world" impression of what the T3 actually does.