Quote Originally Posted by Snyxxx View Post
Yes, but some people put a 120.4 on a CPU loop only to maximize the overclocking of the CPU while putting everything else on the other loop with whatever radiator since it does not matter. This is the point of dual loops. I see this review touting this as "dual loop", which it does have two loops, but not to the spirit of the phrase to get TWO different temperatures with the cooler one where it matters.
For people who want to run two totally separate loops....this product is not for them, and no one is saying that it is

Quote Originally Posted by shazza View Post
I continue to be amazed. While we may have questions about why skinnee chose to present the data as he did, and it's fair to ask for testing in different configurations ... why in the world would people accuse him of "shilling?" Are we trying to run out one of the few people who is doing us a great service by actually doing some testing? There is nothing in skinnee's history that would indicate he would, IN ANY WAY, purposely slant a review to please a supplier/developer/inventor. Yes, he's excited by the performance of the product; I take that to be because he was surprised, and didn't expect the improved performance. I also find it insulting to say that we need martin's take on this. Of course, we all welcome his views, but why take a dig at skinnee?

It would be nice to see people respond to reviews with legitimate questions (and counter data if they have it), without resorting to personal attacks.
Well said Shazza