AMD Processor Pricing
http://www.amd.com/us-en/Processors/...18_609,00.html
AMD Processor Pricing
http://www.amd.com/us-en/Processors/...18_609,00.html
Is it just me or I thought all Phenom II x4 945 has been 95W (at least based on the roadmap)?
it's always been 125w, but i'm glad to see that there is no price difference. yet.
In stock here in Sweden.
http://www.komplett.se/k/ki.aspx?sku=488303
so i guess the people saying those highend p2 chips running notably cooler than specced were right and the 125W specced parts were more like 105W or so and they managed to bring down tdp for at least some parts...
945 3.0 95W
955 3.2 125W
965 3.4 140W
mhhh seems like tdp goes way up above 3ghz though...
maybe they are trying to get tdp down to have a 125W 965?
965 never was and never will be 140W TDP.Originally Posted by saaya
As far as the 945 goes, i would take a guess and say in real world it consumes about 10W less at load then a "125W equivailent" :p
SweClockers.com
CPU: Phenom II X4 955BE
Clock: 4200MHz 1.4375v
Memory: Dominator GT 2x2GB 1600MHz 6-6-6-20 1.65v
Motherboard: ASUS Crosshair IV Formula
GPU: HD 5770
Rose...bud.....
C.....3.......
Perkam
C3?!?!?!?! WHERE?!?!/!?!1!?? pls tell.......
This looks interesting.
965BE
http://www.shopblt.com/cgi-bin/shop/...er_id=!ORDERID!
945 95w
http://www.shopblt.com/cgi-bin/shop/...er_id=!ORDERID!
it shows a crap load of 965BE coming on the July 24. amd 945 95w on the 29th.
This site has been wrong a lot of times as far as ETA goes but you never know. Probably crap?
Last edited by trans am; 07-22-2009 at 01:56 PM.
Besides, they claim 140 W for the 965?
Besides, they claim 140 W for the 965?
945 3.0 95W
955 3.2 125W
965 3.4 140W
I thought 965 was 140w?? What's is supposed to be? 125w?
I thought AMD ditched that idea>>>
http://www.guru3d.com/news/amd-pheno...have-140w-tdp/
Last edited by trans am; 07-22-2009 at 02:04 PM.
It's not a BE with unlocked multipliers? If not, meh. Still a very good power rating though. Leaps and bounds better than my Phenom II 940 hehe.
Core i7 2600K@4.6Ghz| 16GB G.Skill@2133Mhz 9-11-10-28-38 1.65v| ASUS P8Z77-V PRO | Corsair 750i PSU | ASUS GTX 980 OC | Xonar DSX | Samsung 840 Pro 128GB |A bunch of HDDs and terabytes | Oculus Rift w/ touch | ASUS 24" 144Hz G-sync monitor
As far as I know it's 125w, and I don't know the Guru3D doesn't list any sources.
Smile
well since the HW inventory list says 140w and guru says 140w. I think its safe to say its 140w.
Is this cpu a new stepping or just a better bin? I see this new chip on newegg but not the 965, when is the 965 supposed to be available?
As far as I know it's a 125 TDP part, that's what is said by most sites I just Googled through in about 5 minutes. Including this one: http://www.salland.eu/?pid=188500&ref=2
"When in doubt, C-4!" -- Jamie Hyneman
Silverstone TJ-09 Case | Seasonic X-750 PSU | Intel Core i5 750 CPU | ASUS P7P55D PRO Mobo | OCZ 4GB DDR3 RAM | ATI Radeon 5850 GPU | Intel X-25M 80GB SSD | WD 2TB HDD | Windows 7 x64 | NEC EA23WMi 23" Monitor |Auzentech X-Fi Forte Soundcard | Creative T3 2.1 Speakers | AudioTechnica AD900 Headphone |
I dont know about you but I dont give a crap if its 140 or 125 or 95w as long as it overclocks well, who gives a crap!!?? Energy efficiency is the last thing I'm concerned with when I'm overclocking.
is this xtremesystems or energyefficientsystems?
I'd say you should give a crap is you only care about overclocking, since a lower TDP rating also means you have to cool less and this may give you some extra headroom. Though in this case the lower TDP rating is more of an indication that AMD's manufacturing process in improving.I dont know about you but I dont give a crap if its 140 or 125 or 95w as long as it overclocks well, who gives a crap!!?? Energy efficiency is the last thing I'm concerned with when I'm overclocking.
is this xtremesystems or energyefficientsystems?
"When in doubt, C-4!" -- Jamie Hyneman
Silverstone TJ-09 Case | Seasonic X-750 PSU | Intel Core i5 750 CPU | ASUS P7P55D PRO Mobo | OCZ 4GB DDR3 RAM | ATI Radeon 5850 GPU | Intel X-25M 80GB SSD | WD 2TB HDD | Windows 7 x64 | NEC EA23WMi 23" Monitor |Auzentech X-Fi Forte Soundcard | Creative T3 2.1 Speakers | AudioTechnica AD900 Headphone |
Yeah maybe at stock voltage. all that goes right out the window when you start bumping vcore.
have to Cool less? in my experience these low wattage chips get so much hotter when you add voltage. It seems they get more efficient and run cool at stock volts but the slightest bump in vcore and they sizzle.
The TDP ratings of 965 is still 125W TDP I promise
Last edited by Smartidiot89; 07-23-2009 at 07:04 AM.
SweClockers.com
CPU: Phenom II X4 955BE
Clock: 4200MHz 1.4375v
Memory: Dominator GT 2x2GB 1600MHz 6-6-6-20 1.65v
Motherboard: ASUS Crosshair IV Formula
GPU: HD 5770
This is probably just CTI and/or STT at work.
Yes it is 125W!The TDP ratings of 965 is still 125W TDP I promise
No, it's not.
Where courage, motivation and ignorance meet, a persistent idiot awakens.
Here's my experience with 95W X4 945:
Default voltage (VID) and temps @ idle (inside case, under Xigmatek 1284 LowRPM with ~28 C ambient)
Required voltage for primable 3.6GHz under 64-bitnom Vista Ultimate
Yeah you need to O'Ced this baby via HTT, but that doesn't matter even if you forget to lower HyperTransport multi
all this on ASUS M3A79-T and BallistiX DDR2-800... maybe some good AM3 mobo can pull out even more from this CPU under these voltages, but I'm happy with "975-alike" clocks @ 1.35V
Adobe is working on Flash Player support for 64-bit platforms as part of our ongoing commitment to the cross-platform compatibility of Flash Player. We expect to provide native support for 64-bit platforms in an upcoming release of Flash Player following the release of Flash Player 10.1.
massman, i think some ES are 140W but apparently the retail ones will be 125W
Posting Permissions
Reply With Quote
Bookmarks