Page 6 of 7 FirstFirst ... 34567 LastLast
Results 126 to 150 of 173

Thread: AMD: You'll be pleasantly surprised

  1. #126
    I am Xtreme
    Join Date
    Jul 2004
    Location
    Little Rock
    Posts
    7,204
    Quote Originally Posted by trinibwoy View Post
    Isn't the 4870 already < $150?

    Sure that can happen if you assume best case for AMD and worst case for Nvidia.

    Yeah it looks like Phenon II is making a run so they can definitely capitalize on that to get AMD GPUs into those systems as well.
    Wishful thinking!

    Then they need to work a little harder and nothing will be thrown in their laps. Again, Apple is a good barometer of the rest of the market, they just dumped AMD. I'm not sure if you guys think they are Fanboys or not.

    Before I get jumped for saying that, all 4 of the computers in my home have ATI video cards Had 5 with ATI cards but sold the old AMD rig.
    Quote Originally Posted by Movieman
    With the two approaches to "how" to design a processor WE are the lucky ones as we get to choose what is important to us as individuals.
    For that we should thank BOTH (AMD and Intel) companies!


    Posted by duploxxx
    I am sure JF is relaxed and smiling these days with there intended launch schedule. SNB Xeon servers on the other hand....
    Posted by gallag
    there yo go bringing intel into a amd thread again lol, if that was someone droping a dig at amd you would be crying like a girl.
    qft!

  2. #127
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Location
    Sweden
    Posts
    450
    Quote Originally Posted by Donnie27 View Post
    Wishful thinking!

    Then they need to work a little harder and nothing will be thrown in their laps. Again, Apple is a good barometer of the rest of the market, they just dumped AMD. I'm not sure if you guys think they are Fanboys or not.

    Before I get jumped for saying that, all 4 of the computers in my home have ATI video cards Had 5 with ATI cards but sold the old AMD rig.
    Why wouldn't they get some OEMs? The 4000-series are truly great bang for buck and the 780G and 790G/GX are good IGPs.

  3. #128
    Xtreme Mentor
    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Location
    Shimla , India
    Posts
    2,631
    Quote Originally Posted by Donnie27 View Post
    Wishful thinking!

    Then they need to work a little harder and nothing will be thrown in their laps. Again, Apple is a good barometer of the rest of the market, they just dumped AMD. I'm not sure if you guys think they are Fanboys or not.

    Before I get jumped for saying that, all 4 of the computers in my home have ATI video cards Had 5 with ATI cards but sold the old AMD rig.
    Apple only seeks max profits.

    Why did they shift to samsung audio dsp's in their ipods??

    Because samsung chips are lower price

    Why did they shift from ATi to Nvidia??

    Nvidia offered mobo's for intel processors and gpus this means a full package cost cheaper to apple than ATi+Intel processor and mobo.

  4. #129
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    Mar 2007
    Location
    United Kingdom
    Posts
    1,597
    Quote Originally Posted by prava View Post
    Lol, UK prizes are a bit crazy... here in Spain you can find HD4890 from 180€ (reference models) to 200€ (Saphire Toxic). Asus Atomic is a bit more, but not much... 4870X2 is between 300-350€.
    UK prices are always bad, have you seen the prices for the ASUS 295 4GB version of the GTX 295? (MARS) it's £1030 to £13xx

    The Spanish prices you quoted make more sense as the HD4890 card is good but not 4870X2 good
    The only thing I do not like about ATi cards at the moment (and this is coming from an intel and nVidia fanboy) is that their coolers are REALLY LOUD!! I was disappointed with the loudness of my GTX 280 OCX cooler, but the HD4890 in a friend's PC IS LOUDER!!!

    I just wish HIS and Sapphire put their custom cool quiet coolers on cards throughout their entire range.

    Also I think MultiGPU as it stands is a flawed solution, unless it can be more "transparent" and rely less on drivers and developers adding specific support. If I had to pick between SLI and Crossfire I would say that Crossfire scales better and performs better than SLI, but SLI has more developer support

    John
    Stop looking at the walls, look out the window

  5. #130
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    Apr 2007
    Posts
    1,870
    Quote Originally Posted by Donnie27 View Post
    Wishful thinking!
    I'm not projecting anything into the future. But based on several market analysis reports and stuff like the steam survey AMD has been clawing back CPU marketshare in the last few quarters. Nothing to do with wishing, just facts on the ground.

  6. #131
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    Mar 2007
    Location
    United Kingdom
    Posts
    1,597
    AuthenticAMD
    34.22% 33.84% 33.51% 32.80%

    GenuineIntel
    65.77% 66.16% 66.48% 67.19%
    Stop looking at the walls, look out the window

  7. #132
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    Apr 2007
    Posts
    1,870
    Yeah not sure why I remembered seeing gains for AMD on steam.... On an optimistic note their mainstream offerings are currently stronger than they've been in a while so hopefully we see an increase in competition going forward.

  8. #133
    Live Long And Overclock
    Join Date
    Sep 2004
    Posts
    14,058
    AMD: You'll be pleasantly surprised
    ...at how many BMWs our Marketing Guys own for doing absolute nothing

    Perkam

  9. #134
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Posts
    1,326
    Quote Originally Posted by perkam View Post
    ...at how many BMWs our Marketing Guys own for doing absolute nothing

    Perkam
    QFT..
    Mojo stands for Compute Power!
    No need for powerfull CPUs or GPUs anymore. All you need is Mojo!

  10. #135
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Location
    Michigan
    Posts
    134
    Well AMD's marketing budget is like $5 so I never understood how people thought they would outdo Intel in marketing (not that they have not made mistakes).

  11. #136
    Live Long And Overclock
    Join Date
    Sep 2004
    Posts
    14,058
    Quote Originally Posted by Star_Hunter View Post
    Well AMD's marketing budget is like $5 so I never understood how people thought they would outdo Intel in marketing (not that they have not made mistakes).
    AMD can do a million things with its product line.

    Apple keeps the entire industry guessing and it's marketing budget is less than a tenth of Microsoft's.

    The key words are: Disruptive Innovation.

    What AMD does is: Predictable Innovation

    Perkam

  12. #137
    I am Xtreme
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Posts
    7,750
    i still remember from when i did sales at compusa, people coming in asking, does it have centrino, as if thats all that maters, cause thats all they knew existed thanks to tv.

  13. #138
    Banned
    Join Date
    Apr 2008
    Location
    Brisbane, Australia
    Posts
    3,601
    Quote Originally Posted by perkam View Post
    AMD can do a million things with its product line.

    Apple keeps the entire industry guessing and it's marketing budget is less than a tenth of Microsoft's.

    The key words are: Disruptive Innovation.

    What AMD does is: Predictable Innovation

    Perkam
    I'm gonna give you a 10/10 for this post. AMD's marketing is woeful and that is not down to budget.

  14. #139
    Banned
    Join Date
    Aug 2008
    Posts
    1,052
    Quote Originally Posted by perkam View Post
    AMD can do a million things with its product line.

    Apple keeps the entire industry guessing and it's marketing budget is less than a tenth of Microsoft's.
    And what is Apple's profit compared to Microsoft's?

    Anyway, comparing AMD to Apple is silly.

    Apple have the massive advantage in any such misaligned comparison by being able to exploit Industrial Design aspects/advantages and software aspects/innovations.

    A much more apt comparison between marketing departments would have been ATI vs Nvidia before ATI was bought by AMD.

  15. #140
    Live Long And Overclock
    Join Date
    Sep 2004
    Posts
    14,058
    Quote Originally Posted by Chad Boga View Post
    And what is Apple's profit compared to Microsoft's?

    Anyway, comparing AMD to Apple is silly.

    Apple have the massive advantage in any such misaligned comparison by being able to exploit Industrial Design aspects/advantages and software aspects/innovations.

    A much more apt comparison between marketing departments would have been ATI vs Nvidia before ATI was bought by AMD.
    You do have a point.

    People still walk into stores asking for Radeons by name, irrespective of the specs.

    The problem is, Radeon was an entire platform from notebooks to desktop to high end. AMD has diluted its product line so much into Athlon and Phenom and Neo that no one knows what AMD is about anymore.

    What's next AMD? Teflon X4 ?

    Perkam

  16. #141
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Posts
    2,125
    Quote Originally Posted by perkam View Post
    Apple keeps the entire industry guessing and it's marketing budget is less than a tenth of Microsoft's.
    You sure about that? I know that Apple spent something like $486 million to advertise, which is moe than MS spent on Vista advertising

    And Apple's business model is very different... it involves advertising to fanatics who are beyond reason!

  17. #142
    Xtremely High Voltage Sparky's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2006
    Location
    Ohio, USA
    Posts
    16,040
    Quote Originally Posted by perkam View Post
    You do have a point.

    People still walk into stores asking for Radeons by name, irrespective of the specs.

    The problem is, Radeon was an entire platform from notebooks to desktop to high end. AMD has diluted its product line so much into Athlon and Phenom and Neo that no one knows what AMD is about anymore.

    What's next AMD? Teflon X4 ?

    Perkam
    lol, teflon

    I still think AMD should have kept the Athlon name.
    The Cardboard Master
    Crunch with us, the XS WCG team
    Intel Core i7 2600k @ 4.5GHz, 16GB DDR3-1600, Radeon 7950 @ 1000/1250, Win 10 Pro x64

  18. #143
    Xtreme Enthusiast
    Join Date
    Nov 2008
    Location
    Sweden
    Posts
    621
    Quote Originally Posted by perkam View Post
    What's next AMD? Teflon X4 ?
    Perkam
    Introducing the new Teflon X4! You can fry eggs on it while you game, and it won't stick!
    Main Rig: Phenom II X6 1055T 95W @3562 (285x12.5) MHz, Corsair XMS2 DDR2 (2x2GB), Gigabyte HD7970 OC (1000 MHz) 3GB, ASUS M3A78-EM,
    Corsair F60 60 GB SSD + various HDDs, Corsair HX650 (3.3V/20A, 5V/20A, 12V/54A), Antec P180 Mini


    Notebook: HP ProBook 6465b w/ A6-3410MX and 8GB DDR3 1600

  19. #144
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    Sep 2008
    Posts
    449
    So is AMD prommising that it will have a full hard launch of Evergreen gpus by Q4 2009?

    Paper launches do not count in my book
    --lapped Q9650 #L828A446 @ 4.608, 1.45V bios, 1.425V load.
    -- NH-D14 2x Delta AFB1212SHE push/pull and 110 cfm fan -- Coollaboratory Liquid PRO
    -- Gigabyte EP45-UD3P ( F10 ) - G.Skill 4x2Gb 9600 PI @ 1221 5-5-5-15, PL8, 2.1V
    - GTX 480 ( 875/1750/928)
    - HAF 932 - Antec TPQ 1200 -- Crucial C300 128Gb boot --
    Primary Monitor - Samsung T260

  20. #145
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    Dec 2002
    Location
    Sweden
    Posts
    1,261
    Quote Originally Posted by perkam View Post
    You do have a point.

    People still walk into stores asking for Radeons by name, irrespective of the specs.

    The problem is, Radeon was an entire platform from notebooks to desktop to high end. AMD has diluted its product line so much into Athlon and Phenom and Neo that no one knows what AMD is about anymore.

    What's next AMD? Teflon X4 ?

    Perkam
    hah

    apple is very different.. amd is just semiconductor while apple sells some fake bling.

  21. #146
    Xtreme Legend
    Join Date
    Jan 2003
    Location
    Stuttgart, Germany
    Posts
    929
    Quote Originally Posted by LiquidReactor View Post
    So is AMD prommising that it will have a full hard launch of Evergreen gpus by Q4 2009?

    Paper launches do not count in my book
    yes thats what they said. evergreen is a single gpu. dont expect a full range of cards. the whole "hd 5xxx" series will probably be launched by q4 2010

  22. #147
    Banned
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Posts
    1,510
    I wonder if the X2 will come out in q4 2009

  23. #148
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    Jan 2005
    Location
    Grand Forks, ND (Yah sure, you betcha)
    Posts
    1,266
    Quote Originally Posted by ILikeCosmosS View Post
    I wonder if the X4 will come out in q4 2009
    Fixed.
    That is all.

    Peace and love.

  24. #149
    I am Xtreme
    Join Date
    Jul 2004
    Location
    Little Rock
    Posts
    7,204
    Quote Originally Posted by ajaidev View Post
    Apple only seeks max profits.

    Why did they shift to samsung audio dsp's in their ipods??

    Because samsung chips are lower price

    Why did they shift from ATi to Nvidia??

    Nvidia offered mobo's for intel processors and gpus this means a full package cost cheaper to apple than ATi+Intel processor and mobo.
    AMD could have done the same for Apple even if they didn't in the general market. That's with Laptops though Hell, I could see Apple paying for AMD's license if that were the case. As we know, the Nehalem Desktops and Workstations use Intel boards last time I checked. When the 32 nm Arrandale processors ship, they out as far as a chip is concerned. Good news though, one of my Apple Fanatic friends (does work for them) said Apple sales of AMD Video cards very good.

    The other stuff is true but so what?
    Quote Originally Posted by Movieman
    With the two approaches to "how" to design a processor WE are the lucky ones as we get to choose what is important to us as individuals.
    For that we should thank BOTH (AMD and Intel) companies!


    Posted by duploxxx
    I am sure JF is relaxed and smiling these days with there intended launch schedule. SNB Xeon servers on the other hand....
    Posted by gallag
    there yo go bringing intel into a amd thread again lol, if that was someone droping a dig at amd you would be crying like a girl.
    qft!

  25. #150
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Posts
    2,462
    I really hope AMD surprises us The HD-4870 was a great card. It even took over place #1 from the 6800 GT as the graphic card I liked the most.

    Quote Originally Posted by Donnie27 View Post
    AMD could have done the same for Apple even if they didn't in the general market.
    That would mean Apple need to use AMD's processors as well. Seeing most of Apple's products use mobile chips this would be a dumb choice. AMD imho is not an option for mobile devices.

    Plus I don't think AMD could be as good as a partner as Intel is. Me thinks Intel gives Apple more than one helping hand... Remember the C2Ds with the small package that Apple used for their MacBook Air? (I don't think Intel solely did this for Apple, but it surely shows that Apple has some weight on Intel's decisions.) Do you think AMD would or even could have done something like that?
    Notice any grammar or spelling mistakes? Feel free to correct me! Thanks

Page 6 of 7 FirstFirst ... 34567 LastLast

Bookmarks

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •