MMM
Results 1 to 25 of 426

Thread: New Formula One Overclocking Competition Announced

Hybrid View

  1. #1
    Diablo 3! Who's Excited?
    Join Date
    May 2005
    Location
    Boulder, Colorado
    Posts
    9,412
    Quote Originally Posted by Drwho? View Post
    Intel will only sample Store parts, you are so comparing apple and banana ... The all competition makes no sense then.

    Based on some survey I got, more than 80% of the overclockers does it with Air, 12% on water ... the rest is peltier and liquid gas ... you want to leave the majority out?

    Francois
    Simply yes.

    Quote Originally Posted by massman View Post
    Okay, and what would make this F1 competition than so different from what we have already? Hwbot.org and overclocking events would then be just fine.
    Precisely. This would be 2 members contributing to 1 account instead of 1 account per member... *yawn*

    Quote Originally Posted by dinos22 View Post
    i think francois is onto something here massman
    Do you know what SPEC stands for? Standard Performance Evaluation Corporation. This is supposed to be an expo with ridiculous people using ridiculous hardware to showcase ridiculous results. Anything but standard.

  2. #2
    Xtreme Legend
    Join Date
    Mar 2005
    Location
    Australia
    Posts
    17,242
    i dont think you get the point francois is putting across

    i have been talking about some official standards and rules in overclocking preventing manufacturers showcasing their cherry picked hardware like AMD and Intel have been doing in recent times as well as some other that was going on. i know fully well what SPEC is but that is not the point here at all. It is about creating some rules specifically related to our "sport" mate..........extreme overclocking with some sound rules

    that's what francois is talking about

    massman > simply making it a professional sport and really putting the hammer down with some strict rules to prevent comps like this from blowout results where NO ONE would want to watch someone repeatedly win and win due to some advantage they have
    Last edited by dinos22; 06-18-2009 at 05:58 AM.
    Team.AU
    Got tube?
    GIGABYTE Australia
    Need a GIGABYTE bios or support?



  3. #3
    Diablo 3! Who's Excited?
    Join Date
    May 2005
    Location
    Boulder, Colorado
    Posts
    9,412
    Quote Originally Posted by dinos22 View Post
    i dont think you get the point francois is putting across

    i have been talking about some official standards and rules in overclocking preventing manufacturers showcasing their cherry picked hardware like AMD and Intel have been doing in recent times as well as some other that was going on. i know fully well what SPEC is but that is not the point here at all. It is about creating some rules specifically related to our "sport" mate..........extreme overclocking with some sound rules

    that's what francois is talking about
    I thought we had come to that conclusion on page 5 or 6?

  4. #4
    Xtreme Legend
    Join Date
    Mar 2005
    Location
    Australia
    Posts
    17,242
    i like that it's coming from one of the BIG manufacturers that was guilty of cherry picking and showcasing hardware which was not exactly close to retail product thats all
    Team.AU
    Got tube?
    GIGABYTE Australia
    Need a GIGABYTE bios or support?



  5. #5
    I am Xtreme
    Join Date
    Jan 2005
    Posts
    4,714
    Quote Originally Posted by dinos22 View Post
    massman > simply making it a professional sport and really putting the hammer down with some strict rules to prevent comps like this from blowout results where NO ONE would want to watch someone repeatedly win and win due to some advantage they have
    Okay.

    So, the suggestion to prevent winners to win because some advantage is to use only retail samples?

    >> Winner =
    The one who finds the ultimate sample =
    The one who can either test most, or have someone test them for him =
    The one who has the unfair advantage.

    Even the suggestion to put a limit on the used frequency is laughable ... this way, a manufacturer should not push its motherboards, but just make sure it can run a certain frequency.

    How do you define unfair advantage? I mean ... if for instance Evga has a board that allows you to run each cpu 200MHz higher, the Evga team has an unfair advantage, no?
    Where courage, motivation and ignorance meet, a persistent idiot awakens.

Bookmarks

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •