MMM
Results 1 to 25 of 426

Thread: New Formula One Overclocking Competition Announced

Hybrid View

  1. #1
    Xtreme Enthusiast
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Posts
    816

    Lightbulb

    Quote Originally Posted by dinos22 View Post
    Francois
    i like what i hear from you but i wonder how this will actually work in practice
    We probably need to start creating rules and charters that companies will engage themselve to sign up and respect them, the exact same way the F1 or all the technology sports do.

    I can give a hand if the organizers of this contest, I can provide lawyer support to write a draft, and set up one time for all, some public rules that the company participant, and Overclockers has to follow.

    If you look at the Spec Web site, there are rules to be allowed to participate, rules about what you can use during the contest, and how you actually publish your result. They have rules as well on when the hardware you are using has to be released, and they have a verification commision.

    SPEC.org is very much what you want to be inspired by, AMD, Intel, IBM and most of others industry players agreed to sign up on those rules, I know intel will sign up on similar rules if apply to overclocking.

    It is time to move OC to an other level, as an organized sport/Hobby, not only a marketing tool.

    Like every championship, the rules has to evolve over time, here is an example:
    http://www.spec.org/cpu2006/Docs/runrules.html


    Notice:
    1.3.2 Obtaining Components
    Therefore, it is expected that the components used in a published result can in fact be obtained, with the level of quality commonly expected for products sold to ordinary customers. Such components are required to:

    be specified using customer-recognizable names,
    be generally available within certain time frames,
    provide documentation,
    provide an option for customer support,
    be of production quality, and
    provide a suitable environment for programming.
    The judgment of whether a component meets the above list may sometimes pose difficulty, and various references are given in these rules to guidelines for such judgment. But by way of introduction, imagine a vendor-internal version of a compiler, designated only by an internal code name, unavailable to customers, which frequently generates incorrect code. Such a compiler would fail to provide a suitable environment for general programming, and would not be ready for use in a SPEC CPU2006 result.


    If we can inspire a "charter" out of the Spec example, we can establish a very fair and honest contest.

    Francois
    Last edited by Drwho?; 06-18-2009 at 03:41 AM.
    DrWho, The last of the time lords, setting up the Clock.

Bookmarks

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •