Results 1 to 25 of 4708

Thread: X48 Rampage Formula Preview.

Hybrid View

  1. #1
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    Nov 2007
    Location
    Poland
    Posts
    242
    Quote Originally Posted by mikeyakame View Post
    It's like talking to a brick wall

    Linpack calculation errors like in his pic are more than likely CPU GTL1/2 or NB GTL related, I've told him this too. Since CPU GTL1/2 can't be adjusted seperate of CPU GTL0/3, he is screwed basically so he needs to back off settings till its stable.

    CPU GTL1/2 wants to be high, CPU GTL0/3 wants to be low, you can't dial both in low and expect stability, only other alternative is raising Vtt and balancing it out.

    I can replicate those type of Linpack errors on my DFI board simply by changing GTLs by as little as 0.0008v sometimes, and this means one of two things. First most likely my Vtt needs some minor adjustment, or second I've found where the max or min threshold for logic receiver GTL sampling lies.

    You can't test GTLs with a tight PL as well, need to be done with at least PL-2 lower than aimed. That way takes strain off MCH, and if Vnb was too low it won't trash your results. CPU multi should be dropped as well by 1 or 2x. To give a frequency that'll work on VID for testing.
    That's exacly what I meant before, quads with high clock + mem with high clock + low performance level probably will no go.
    e8500 @ 8x500 1.275v // true // rampage formula // 2x hr-05 sli/ifx // ballistix tracer 1066@1200 cl5 2.14v // en8800gt // hr-03 gt // 2x wd2500aaks // dp p7 550w // g5+g7 // e2201w-1 // p183 + 6x s-flex

    mems: vitesta ee+ 800@1200 cl5 2.4v

  2. #2
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Location
    Land of Koalas and Wombats
    Posts
    1,058
    Quote Originally Posted by kuebk View Post
    That's exacly what I meant before, quads with high clock + mem with high clock + low performance level probably will no go.
    Definitely mate.

    On my previous RF i ran a Q6600 G0. It walled at 481mhz FSB, I ran that every day...but I only ran on 7x multi so 3.36ghz, PL7, and 1158mhz ddr freq. Board threw fits if i tried 8x and 481. It didn't like it period.

    DFI LT-X48-T2R UT CDC24 Bios | Q9550 E0 | G.Skill DDR2-1066 PK 2x2GB |
    Geforce GTX 280 729/1566/2698 | Corsair HX1000 | Stacker 832 | Dell 3008WFP


  3. #3
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Location
    Ostend - Belgium
    Posts
    1,253
    Quote Originally Posted by kuebk View Post
    That's exacly what I meant before, quads with high clock + mem with high clock + low performance level probably will no go.
    There is one among us with a C2D and he has the same problem.

    Ooh... If this is the problem ASUS would have told me that.
    I tell you ASUS is trying to fix this problem but doesn't really know how to. BIOS 0902 should have been released a few weeks ago but they didn't because the problem isn't fixed. They only released it because of the fan mail that they received lately.
    Last edited by Alien Grey; 05-06-2009 at 12:31 PM.

  4. #4
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    Nov 2007
    Location
    Poland
    Posts
    242
    Quote Originally Posted by A-Grey View Post
    There is one among us with a C2D and he has the same problem.
    With 2x2 or 2x1?
    e8500 @ 8x500 1.275v // true // rampage formula // 2x hr-05 sli/ifx // ballistix tracer 1066@1200 cl5 2.14v // en8800gt // hr-03 gt // 2x wd2500aaks // dp p7 550w // g5+g7 // e2201w-1 // p183 + 6x s-flex

    mems: vitesta ee+ 800@1200 cl5 2.4v

  5. #5
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Location
    Ostend - Belgium
    Posts
    1,253
    Quote Originally Posted by kuebk View Post
    With 2x2 or 2x1?
    With the G.SKILL F2-9600CL5D-4GBPI of course.

Bookmarks

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •