MMM
Page 12 of 18 FirstFirst ... 29101112131415 ... LastLast
Results 276 to 300 of 433

Thread: HD 4770 Previews/Reviews

  1. #276
    Xtreme Mentor
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Posts
    2,550
    Quote Originally Posted by W1zzard View Post
    i specifically asked amd "does it support triple or quad configurations?" their answer was "By design, the 4770 is limited to two cards in CrossFireX"
    one more reason to get MSI G70, and four HD 4770 cards
    Adobe is working on Flash Player support for 64-bit platforms as part of our ongoing commitment to the cross-platform compatibility of Flash Player. We expect to provide native support for 64-bit platforms in an upcoming release of Flash Player following the release of Flash Player 10.1.

  2. #277
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    Jul 2002
    Location
    [M] - Belgium
    Posts
    1,744
    Quote Originally Posted by Wadkiller View Post
    Need some help here plz.

    Do I wait for the 4770's to be released in SA & go crossfire. Or get 2 1GB 4850's or one 4890?
    single GPU will be your best choice,
    less heat, and if CF support in games fails, the single GPU keeps on trucking


    Belgium's #1 Hardware Review Site and OC-Team!

  3. #278
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Location
    The Netherlands, Friesland
    Posts
    2,244
    Quote Originally Posted by Shintai View Post
    Im not saying its retarded in terms of eye cacthing. But all the practical issues etc. Same space one takes you use 2 "old" etc. Plus even for carry its a wierd shape.
    It isn't practical, but when you buy one all your n00bz0r friends think your are 1337
    >i5-3570K
    >Asrock Z77E-ITX Wifi
    >Asus GTX 670 Mini
    >Cooltek Coolcube Black
    >CM Silent Pro M700
    >Crucial M4 128Gb Msata
    >Cooler Master Seidon 120M
    Hell yes its a mini-ITX gaming rig!

  4. #279
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Posts
    1,326
    Please.. not 4 GPUs with 512MB.. it would be such a waste..




    About mixed Crossfire, don't mind that chart:


    Quote Originally Posted by Driverheaven
    As shown in the graphs above, we did see performance increases over single card mode when using the mixed card CrossFire. In the case of Call of Duty 4 the gain was nowhere near that of true 3870 configuration but it did make our tested settings playable. World of conflict was much more impressive with a doubling of minimum framerates over a single 2900 XT.

    We would imagine that this loophole will be locked down in future drivers but it was certainly interesting to see what was possible.
    Source.


    The capability is certainly there, it's probably just a driver lock.

  5. #280
    Xtreme Mentor
    Join Date
    Jul 2004
    Posts
    3,247
    Finally, Techreport's review
    http://techreport.com/articles.x/16820

  6. #281
    Xtreme Enthusiast
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Location
    Melbourne, Australia
    Posts
    942
    Why would you want to crossfire different model cards anyway? ATI have enough driver problems with regular crossfire (but getting better), crossfiring different models is just asking for trouble.
    Q9550 || DFI P45 Jr || 4x 2G generic ram || 4870X2 || Aerocool M40 case || 3TB storage


  7. #282
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    Oct 2004
    Posts
    1,838
    perhaps triple and quad crossfire disabled over stuttering concerns.
    DFI P965-S/core 2 quad q6600@3.2ghz/4gb gskill ddr2 @ 800mhz cas 4/xfx gtx 260/ silverstone op650/thermaltake xaser 3 case/razer lachesis

  8. #283
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Posts
    89
    Quote Originally Posted by jmke View Post
    single GPU will be your best choice,
    less heat, and if CF support in games fails, the single GPU keeps on trucking


    Is there a lot of titles that don't support crossfire? Would that also be the case if you were to use a x2 model?

    The 4770's will be cheapest solution of the lot. Heat won't be a problem since i would be watercooling them

  9. #284
    Xtreme Mentor
    Join Date
    Jul 2004
    Posts
    3,247
    Radeon HD 4770 Media Edition VS Retail Edition
    Besides Radeon HD 4770 retail edition, AMD has actually prepared another edition for media’s test. The two editions look quite differently, but perform almost equally. As you can see below, the media edition is designed elegantly with a more effective cooler.

    The media edition brings 2-3℃ lower temperature than retail edition, but it causes more noises when the fan runs at maximum speed. Let’s check out together what differences they have. The above one of each group is media edition, and the other one is retail edition .........




    http://en.expreview.com/2009/04/30/r...html#more-3356

  10. #285
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Posts
    1,326
    Quote Originally Posted by onethreehill View Post
    Radeon HD 4770 Media Edition VS Retail Edition

    http://en.expreview.com/2009/04/30/r...html#more-3356

    wow... the crappy cooler version has 8 less capacitors and 4 less MOSFETs (I think those are mosfets)...

  11. #286
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    Jun 2003
    Location
    Italy
    Posts
    351
    Quote Originally Posted by Wadkiller View Post
    Is there a lot of titles that don't support crossfire?
    Speedball 2: Brutal Deluxe doesn't
    3570K @ 4.5Ghz | Gigabyte GA-Z77-D3H | 7970 Ghz 1100/6000 | 256GB Samsung 830 SSD (Win 7) | 256GB Samsung 840 Pro SSD (OSX 10.8.3) | 16GB Vengeance 1600 | 24'' Dell U2412M | Corsair Carbide 300R

  12. #287
    Xtreme Guru
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Posts
    3,562
    Quote Originally Posted by onethreehill View Post
    Radeon HD 4770 Media Edition VS Retail Edition

    http://en.expreview.com/2009/04/30/r...html#more-3356
    If this was Nvidia, everyone would be arming the mob and getting out the pitchforks.

  13. #288
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Location
    Cairo
    Posts
    2,366
    The media edition brings 2-3℃ lower temperature than retail edition, but it causes more noises when the fan runs at maximum speed
    Funny thing is that the retail edition will always run at max speed
    Intel Core I7 920 @ 3.8GHZ 1.28V (Core Contact Freezer)
    Asus X58 P6T
    6GB OCZ Gold DDR3-1600MHZ 8-8-8-24
    XFX HD5870
    WD 1TB Black HD
    Corsair 850TX
    Cooler Master HAF 922

  14. #289
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Location
    Sweden
    Posts
    450
    Quote Originally Posted by SKYMTL View Post
    If this was Nvidia, everyone would be arming the mob and getting out the pitchforks.
    Probably if the clocks were different and with additional memory. The GPU and memory will probably perform within 0,1% of each other between "review" and "retail". Maybe the OC is different but it seems like everyone is hitting the 830MHz boundary so that doesn't seem to stop it.

  15. #290
    Xtreme Guru
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Posts
    3,562
    Quote Originally Posted by kemo View Post
    Funny thing is that the retail edition will always run at max speed
    No. The fan on the retail edition runs at 30% and has small spikes to ~60% fan speed when temperatures hit the mid 60s.

  16. #291
    Xtreme Guru
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Posts
    3,562
    Quote Originally Posted by marten_larsson View Post
    Probably if the clocks were different and with additional memory. The GPU and memory will probably perform within 0,1% of each other between "review" and "retail". Maybe the OC is different but it seems like everyone is hitting the 830MHz boundary so that doesn't seem to stop it.
    830Mhz is the upper limit of the CCC so the fact that everyone is hitting that doesn't come as a surprise. Judging from what I see, power consumption may be different between the two cards as well.

    What I am saying is that ATI sent a product out to reviewers knowing full well their board partners would be releasing slightly "cheaper" versions to retail. If Nvidia did this, Charlie and the whole Nvidia Hate Train would pull up at the station and have their way with it. I know there is no "balance" in this industry or in the minds of people but I personally think someone with both cards should conclusively test one versus the other's power consumption.

    If I was one of those reviewers who received the version that won't be available at retail until XFX releases their card, I would be pretty ticked off.

  17. #292
    Xtreme Mentor
    Join Date
    Jul 2004
    Posts
    3,247
    XFX First to Use Premium Reference Design for Radeon HD 4770
    XFX continues to show enthusiasm with its ATI Radeon line of products, by coming up with the first Radeon HD 4770 accelerator for the market to use the premium reference design for Radeon HD 4770 (model: XFX 4770ST D5 512MB). AMD had come up with two choices of coolers for its partners. Most of them choose the one which is more cost-effective, so the sales margins could be improved in an already tight pricing-segment.

    XFX used the premium reference-design cooler and PCB, with a major difference that it comes in black instead of red. XFX has so far had a knack of trying as hard as it can, to color its cards black. The company did so with the Radeon HD 4870 reference design accelerator recently. This card retains the reference clock speeds of 750 MHz (core), and 800 MHz (memory). Given that XFX chose the more expensive parts in making this card, it will pass on the premium to the consumer, making it slightly more expensive than the reference design cards in its league.

    http://www.techpowerup.com/92862/XFX...n_HD_4770.html

  18. #293
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Location
    Sweden
    Posts
    450
    Quote Originally Posted by SKYMTL View Post
    830Mhz is the upper limit of the CCC so the fact that everyone is hitting that doesn't come as a surprise. Judging from what I see, power consumption may be different between the two cards as well.

    What I am saying is that ATI sent a product out to reviewers knowing full well their board partners would be releasing slightly "cheaper" versions to retail. If Nvidia did this, Charlie and the whole Nvidia Hate Train would pull up at the station and have their way with it. I know there is no "balance" in this industry or in the minds of people but I personally think someone with both cards should conclusively test one versus the other's power consumption.

    If I was one of those reviewers who received the version that won't be available at retail until XFX releases their card, I would be pretty ticked off.
    Well, after looking at your review and Anandtech's it seems like the power consumption is the same. At idle, it's a bit worse than 4830 (~8W) but at load is better(~18W). Compared to the 9800GT it's about the same too. And I assume by what you wrote and previously written that you have a retail card.

    The OC potential is locked by AMD to 830MHz, no one should be complaining about not getting to OC above that level IMO.

    So maybe it's just you blowing things out of proportion?

  19. #294
    Xtreme Guru
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Posts
    3,562
    Quote Originally Posted by marten_larsson View Post

    So maybe it's just you blowing things out of proportion?
    I'm not complaining since I got a retail version. What I was saying that that people seem to react differently to ATI's flubs than they do to Nvidia's. It was more a comment about human nature rather than anything else.

    The OC potential is locked by AMD to 830MHz, no one should be complaining about not getting to OC above that level IMO.
    Since people will soon be (and some are already) using RivaTuner which can clock the card FAR above 830Mhz, it could become an issue.

  20. #295
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Location
    Cairo
    Posts
    2,366
    Quote Originally Posted by SKYMTL View Post
    No. The fan on the retail edition runs at 30% and has small spikes to ~60% fan speed when temperatures hit the mid 60s.
    I can only see only two wires powering the fan so i though no PWM = no fan control
    Last edited by kemo; 04-30-2009 at 06:31 AM.
    Intel Core I7 920 @ 3.8GHZ 1.28V (Core Contact Freezer)
    Asus X58 P6T
    6GB OCZ Gold DDR3-1600MHZ 8-8-8-24
    XFX HD5870
    WD 1TB Black HD
    Corsair 850TX
    Cooler Master HAF 922

  21. #296
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2004
    Location
    Bel Air, Maryland
    Posts
    143
    Quote Originally Posted by SKYMTL View Post
    I'm not complaining since I got a retail version. What I was saying that that people seem to react differently to ATI's flubs than they do to Nvidia's. It was more a comment about human nature rather than anything else.



    Since people will soon be (and some are already) using RivaTuner which can clock the card FAR above 830Mhz, it could become an issue.
    Yeah, I was thinking about buying one of these to play around with, in addition to recommending them to some of my friends. This development of the lack of some hardware on the board has really turned me off to this card though. ATi, it isn't liked when nVidia does it, what makes you think it won't be minded when YOU do it? As the picture above shows, even the XFX board is missing the same hardware. No thanks.
    Intel i7-2700k@ 4.7ghz (46x102)
    Asus P8Z68 Deluxe GEN3
    G.Skill 2x4gb RipjawX 2133 11-11-11-30
    GTX 680 1220/7000
    Corsair TX750W
    Razer Lachesis w/ Razer Pro|Pad
    1x160gb Seagate HDD, 2x1tb Seagate HDD
    LG 22" 226WTQ & BenQ G2400WD
    Windows 7 Ultimate x64 SP1

  22. #297
    Xtreme Enthusiast
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Location
    Melbourne, Australia
    Posts
    942
    The missing hardware (mosfets, capacitors) will make 0 difference, unless you are running LN2 and you absolutely need to run 1.6v through the card
    Q9550 || DFI P45 Jr || 4x 2G generic ram || 4870X2 || Aerocool M40 case || 3TB storage


  23. #298
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Posts
    89
    I hope your right oohms, cause i just pulled the trigger on two XFX 4770's. Will probably get them end next week.

  24. #299
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2005
    Location
    No(r)way
    Posts
    452
    Quote Originally Posted by kemo View Post
    I can only see only two wires powering the fan so i though no PWM = no fan control
    Regulate the voltage to the fan, and you'll regulate the fan speed. It's perhaps not as "smart" as PWM control, but it should work if the bios/software allows it.
    Obsolescence be thy name

  25. #300
    Xtreme Guru
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Posts
    3,562
    The HD 4770 uses direct voltage control to make sure the fan runs at an acceptable speed.

Page 12 of 18 FirstFirst ... 29101112131415 ... LastLast

Bookmarks

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •