Adobe is working on Flash Player support for 64-bit platforms as part of our ongoing commitment to the cross-platform compatibility of Flash Player. We expect to provide native support for 64-bit platforms in an upcoming release of Flash Player following the release of Flash Player 10.1.
>i5-3570K
>Asrock Z77E-ITX Wifi
>Asus GTX 670 Mini
>Cooltek Coolcube Black
>CM Silent Pro M700
>Crucial M4 128Gb Msata
>Cooler Master Seidon 120M
Hell yes its a mini-ITX gaming rig!
Please.. not 4 GPUs with 512MB.. it would be such a waste..
About mixed Crossfire, don't mind that chart:
Source.Originally Posted by Driverheaven
The capability is certainly there, it's probably just a driver lock.
Finally, Techreport's review
http://techreport.com/articles.x/16820
perhaps triple and quad crossfire disabled over stuttering concerns.
DFI P965-S/core 2 quad q6600@3.2ghz/4gb gskill ddr2 @ 800mhz cas 4/xfx gtx 260/ silverstone op650/thermaltake xaser 3 case/razer lachesis
Radeon HD 4770 Media Edition VS Retail Edition
http://en.expreview.com/2009/04/30/r...html#more-3356Besides Radeon HD 4770 retail edition, AMD has actually prepared another edition for media’s test. The two editions look quite differently, but perform almost equally. As you can see below, the media edition is designed elegantly with a more effective cooler.
The media edition brings 2-3℃ lower temperature than retail edition, but it causes more noises when the fan runs at maximum speed. Let’s check out together what differences they have. The above one of each group is media edition, and the other one is retail edition .........
Funny thing is that the retail edition will always run at max speedThe media edition brings 2-3℃ lower temperature than retail edition, but it causes more noises when the fan runs at maximum speed
Intel Core I7 920 @ 3.8GHZ 1.28V (Core Contact Freezer)
Asus X58 P6T
6GB OCZ Gold DDR3-1600MHZ 8-8-8-24
XFX HD5870
WD 1TB Black HD
Corsair 850TX
Cooler Master HAF 922
Probably if the clocks were different and with additional memory. The GPU and memory will probably perform within 0,1% of each other between "review" and "retail". Maybe the OC is different but it seems like everyone is hitting the 830MHz boundary so that doesn't seem to stop it.
830Mhz is the upper limit of the CCC so the fact that everyone is hitting that doesn't come as a surprise. Judging from what I see, power consumption may be different between the two cards as well.
What I am saying is that ATI sent a product out to reviewers knowing full well their board partners would be releasing slightly "cheaper" versions to retail. If Nvidia did this, Charlie and the whole Nvidia Hate Train would pull up at the station and have their way with it. I know there is no "balance" in this industry or in the minds of people but I personally think someone with both cards should conclusively test one versus the other's power consumption.
If I was one of those reviewers who received the version that won't be available at retail until XFX releases their card, I would be pretty ticked off.
XFX First to Use Premium Reference Design for Radeon HD 4770
http://www.techpowerup.com/92862/XFX...n_HD_4770.htmlXFX continues to show enthusiasm with its ATI Radeon line of products, by coming up with the first Radeon HD 4770 accelerator for the market to use the premium reference design for Radeon HD 4770 (model: XFX 4770ST D5 512MB). AMD had come up with two choices of coolers for its partners. Most of them choose the one which is more cost-effective, so the sales margins could be improved in an already tight pricing-segment.
XFX used the premium reference-design cooler and PCB, with a major difference that it comes in black instead of red. XFX has so far had a knack of trying as hard as it can, to color its cards black. The company did so with the Radeon HD 4870 reference design accelerator recently. This card retains the reference clock speeds of 750 MHz (core), and 800 MHz (memory). Given that XFX chose the more expensive parts in making this card, it will pass on the premium to the consumer, making it slightly more expensive than the reference design cards in its league.
![]()
Well, after looking at your review and Anandtech's it seems like the power consumption is the same. At idle, it's a bit worse than 4830 (~8W) but at load is better(~18W). Compared to the 9800GT it's about the same too. And I assume by what you wrote and previously written that you have a retail card.
The OC potential is locked by AMD to 830MHz, no one should be complaining about not getting to OC above that level IMO.
So maybe it's just you blowing things out of proportion?
I'm not complaining since I got a retail version. What I was saying that that people seem to react differently to ATI's flubs than they do to Nvidia's. It was more a comment about human nature rather than anything else.
Since people will soon be (and some are already) using RivaTuner which can clock the card FAR above 830Mhz, it could become an issue.The OC potential is locked by AMD to 830MHz, no one should be complaining about not getting to OC above that level IMO.
Last edited by kemo; 04-30-2009 at 06:31 AM.
Intel Core I7 920 @ 3.8GHZ 1.28V (Core Contact Freezer)
Asus X58 P6T
6GB OCZ Gold DDR3-1600MHZ 8-8-8-24
XFX HD5870
WD 1TB Black HD
Corsair 850TX
Cooler Master HAF 922
Yeah, I was thinking about buying one of these to play around with, in addition to recommending them to some of my friends. This development of the lack of some hardware on the board has really turned me off to this card though. ATi, it isn't liked when nVidia does it, what makes you think it won't be minded when YOU do it? As the picture above shows, even the XFX board is missing the same hardware. No thanks.
Intel i7-2700k@ 4.7ghz (46x102)
Asus P8Z68 Deluxe GEN3
G.Skill 2x4gb RipjawX 2133 11-11-11-30
GTX 680 1220/7000
Corsair TX750W
Razer Lachesis w/ Razer Pro|Pad
1x160gb Seagate HDD, 2x1tb Seagate HDD
LG 22" 226WTQ & BenQ G2400WD
Windows 7 Ultimate x64 SP1
I hope your right oohms, cause i just pulled the trigger on two XFX 4770's. Will probably get them end next week.
The HD 4770 uses direct voltage control to make sure the fan runs at an acceptable speed.
Bookmarks