Your Q9650 is a better stepping(E0) than my QX9650(C0), hence your chip although multi locked would fair better @ higher FSBs/clocks.Also, I can't get this freaking thing to post @1600 RAM linked/synced for 400x9.5=same 3.8GHZ. I guess I would have to try harder. The wierd thing is I was one of the first ones with this board to do 4GHZ on my QX9650 with my 2GB GSkill BHZs(445x9), 12 hours prime stable with 1.375 Vcore with LLC, which I guess gives me 1.44 or thereabouts, on air.So my theory is that for core 2 quads, the way they have been architected(2 C2Ds stuck back to back), might have to do something with it(the more the RAM, the more Vcore it needs to be stable @the same speed). I could be wrong on this.
The voltage anomalies that you see if one of the main culprits of this board that leads to a lot of instablities. Guess what, just for the kicks, I rebooted with the same exact settings and ran prime again and it failed just after 2 hours on one of the cores, as it had dropped my vcore compared to the previous run of being 8 hours prime stable,with the same BIOS setting.It could be that the software that I am using that gives the vocre might be wrong,but I doubt and prime failing kinda confirms this. It's either the BIOS(software) or the PWM/power delivery(hardware).I was this close to tossing this board out and buying a good x48 board, so that I can swap my GTX 260 tri-sli to my Classified build and have the 4870x2+4890 crossfireX combo on the x48, but resisted it.The only reason that I am keeping this rig eventhough I am building an i7 rig is that I am planning to go water on my i7 build sometime and I wanted a high end backup gaming rig(air cooled) just in case something goes wrong(first time planning to go water and the thought itself scares the heck outta me).




Reply With Quote

Bookmarks