sweet result mate! Have you tryed taking them to 1800Mhz at them timing!
sweet result mate! Have you tryed taking them to 1800Mhz at them timing!
Mine sticks is Corsair but thx for the info i give it a try.Originally Posted by chew*
Chip came in. I'm a little upset with my M4A79T. I can't ever save BIOS settings or it'll refuse to POST until cleared, even if no settings are actually changed.
Particle's First Rule of Online Technical Discussion:
As a thread about any computer related subject has its length approach infinity, the likelihood and inevitability of a poorly constructed AMD vs. Intel fight also exponentially increases.
Rule 1A:
Likewise, the frequency of a car pseudoanalogy to explain a technical concept increases with thread length. This will make many people chuckle, as computer people are rarely knowledgeable about vehicular mechanics.
Rule 2:
When confronted with a post that is contrary to what a poster likes, believes, or most often wants to be correct, the poster will pick out only minor details that are largely irrelevant in an attempt to shut out the conflicting idea. The core of the post will be left alone since it isn't easy to contradict what the person is actually saying.
Rule 2A:
When a poster cannot properly refute a post they do not like (as described above), the poster will most likely invent fictitious counter-points and/or begin to attack the other's credibility in feeble ways that are dramatic but irrelevant. Do not underestimate this tactic, as in the online world this will sway many observers. Do not forget: Correctness is decided only by what is said last, the most loudly, or with greatest repetition.
Rule 3:
When it comes to computer news, 70% of Internet rumors are outright fabricated, 20% are inaccurate enough to simply be discarded, and about 10% are based in reality. Grains of salt--become familiar with them.
Remember: When debating online, everyone else is ALWAYS wrong if they do not agree with you!
Random Tip o' the Whatever
You just can't win. If your product offers feature A instead of B, people will moan how A is stupid and it didn't offer B. If your product offers B instead of A, they'll likewise complain and rant about how anyone's retarded cousin could figure out A is what the market wants.
Phenom II X4 955 BE / DFI LP DK 790FXB-M3H5 TEST
Phenom II X4 955 BE
CPU 3450MHz, NB 2760MHz / 1M PI
Phenom II X4 955 BE
CPU 3450MHz, NB 2760MHz
Phenom II X4 955 BE
CPU 3375MHz, NB 2925MHz / 1M PI
Phenom II X4 955 BE
CPU 3375MHz, NB 2925MHz
Phenom II X4 955 BE @ 4G
DDR3-1772MHz 7-7-7-21 2T
NB 2882MHz
BIOS SET 4G
Awsome
heatware chew*
I've got no strings to hold me down.
To make me fret, or make me frown.
I had strings but now I'm free.
There are no strings on me
There we go...the WD2500JB refused to let the system work unless it was explicitly set to slave. Installing Server 2008 x64 and will have numbers soon.
As a thread about any computer related subject has its length approach infinity, the likelihood and inevitability of a poorly constructed AMD vs. Intel fight also exponentially increases.
Likewise, the frequency of a car pseudoanalogy to explain a technical concept increases with thread length. This will make many people chuckle, as computer people are rarely knowledgeable about vehicular mechanics.
When confronted with a post that is contrary to what a poster likes, believes, or most often wants to be correct, the poster will pick out only minor details that are largely irrelevant in an attempt to shut out the conflicting idea. The core of the post will be left alone since it isn't easy to contradict what the person is actually saying.
When a poster cannot properly refute a post they do not like (as described above), the poster will most likely invent fictitious counter-points and/or begin to attack the other's credibility in feeble ways that are dramatic but irrelevant. Do not underestimate this tactic, as in the online world this will sway many observers. Do not forget: Correctness is decided only by what is said last, the most loudly, or with greatest repetition.
When it comes to computer news, 70% of Internet rumors are outright fabricated, 20% are inaccurate enough to simply be discarded, and about 10% are based in reality. Grains of salt--become familiar with them.
Remember: When debating online, everyone else is ALWAYS wrong if they do not agree with you!
Random Tip o' the Whatever
You just can't win. If your product offers feature A instead of B, people will moan how A is stupid and it didn't offer B. If your product offers B instead of A, they'll likewise complain and rant about how anyone's retarded cousin could figure out A is what the market wants.
Just playing with mine now.
M3a79T deluxe 0803 bios. Single 4850 gpu modded for low idle power. Water cooled.
For a quick start I used the bios settings from my 720 and trimmed back the multipliers. 3.8 looked ok in Prime as did 3.9. I could not get 4.0 to prime for more than 15 minutes so switched back to 3.9 for a while. As the 12v line was showing 11.6v I checked the plug in watt meter. For reference the 720 idles around 150w @ 3.8 1.55v, the 955 @3.9 1.55v is idling at 220w, up to 380w under prime
Silly power draw for 24/7 operation. If I can't get below the 180w idle mark at 3.8 then this chip will be looking for a new home
Thats not a 720 Way to much volts.........the Phrase less is more applies here. I would start from scratch, when i got mine I took the same approach and was dissapointed. I took a step back started from scratch and was pleased....Just playing with mine now.
M3a79T deluxe 0803 bios. Single 4850 gpu modded for low idle power. Water cooled.
For a quick start I used the bios settings from my 720 and trimmed back the multipliers. 3.8 looked ok in Prime as did 3.9. I could not get 4.0 to prime for more than 15 minutes so switched back to 3.9 for a while. As the 12v line was showing 11.6v I checked the plug in watt meter. For reference the 720 idles around 150w @ 3.8 1.55v, the 955 @3.9 1.55v is idling at 220w, up to 380w under prime
Silly power draw for 24/7 operation. If I can't get below the 180w idle mark at 3.8 then this chip will be looking for a new home
heatware chew*
I've got no strings to hold me down.
To make me fret, or make me frown.
I had strings but now I'm free.
There are no strings on me
Thanks for that chew*
I'll scale back to my reference 3.8, find the sweet spot then try again
Edit:
The above reminds me of booting an old 939 chip at 3.2, the Tagan roared. Who would have thought such a small piece of silicon could handle the best part of 430 watts
Last edited by ecat; 04-24-2009 at 05:43 PM.
Good going Green team. Its nice to know future AMD chips will work on AM2+ boards. My 940 is plenty for now, but when these get cheaper, I will make the jump. Good results to everyone who posted info.
Desktop:
Antec 300
Foxcon A7AD-S 790GX
8GB Gskill PC-1066@5/5/5/12
PII X940 BE @3.6GHZ
Sunbeam Core Contact
2x 640GB in Raid 0+1
4870 512MB@800/1000
Vista Business 64bit W/ SP1
It's not much so far, but it's a start:
Anyone know if ganged is better for SuperPI?
As a thread about any computer related subject has its length approach infinity, the likelihood and inevitability of a poorly constructed AMD vs. Intel fight also exponentially increases.
Likewise, the frequency of a car pseudoanalogy to explain a technical concept increases with thread length. This will make many people chuckle, as computer people are rarely knowledgeable about vehicular mechanics.
When confronted with a post that is contrary to what a poster likes, believes, or most often wants to be correct, the poster will pick out only minor details that are largely irrelevant in an attempt to shut out the conflicting idea. The core of the post will be left alone since it isn't easy to contradict what the person is actually saying.
When a poster cannot properly refute a post they do not like (as described above), the poster will most likely invent fictitious counter-points and/or begin to attack the other's credibility in feeble ways that are dramatic but irrelevant. Do not underestimate this tactic, as in the online world this will sway many observers. Do not forget: Correctness is decided only by what is said last, the most loudly, or with greatest repetition.
When it comes to computer news, 70% of Internet rumors are outright fabricated, 20% are inaccurate enough to simply be discarded, and about 10% are based in reality. Grains of salt--become familiar with them.
Remember: When debating online, everyone else is ALWAYS wrong if they do not agree with you!
Random Tip o' the Whatever
You just can't win. If your product offers feature A instead of B, people will moan how A is stupid and it didn't offer B. If your product offers B instead of A, they'll likewise complain and rant about how anyone's retarded cousin could figure out A is what the market wants.
I found it better in my test a while back on my 940.
~1~
AMD Ryzen 9 3900X
GigaByte X570 AORUS LITE
Trident-Z 3200 CL14 16GB
AMD Radeon VII
~2~
AMD Ryzen ThreadRipper 2950x
Asus Prime X399-A
GSkill Flare-X 3200mhz, CAS14, 64GB
AMD RX 5700 XT
Supposed to be but I can never get ganged to run stable on giga, unganged is better for everyday use.
heatware chew*
I've got no strings to hold me down.
To make me fret, or make me frown.
I had strings but now I'm free.
There are no strings on me
What is a safe upper limit on the CPU/NB, for reference? Pretty much the same as the CPU cores?
As a thread about any computer related subject has its length approach infinity, the likelihood and inevitability of a poorly constructed AMD vs. Intel fight also exponentially increases.
Likewise, the frequency of a car pseudoanalogy to explain a technical concept increases with thread length. This will make many people chuckle, as computer people are rarely knowledgeable about vehicular mechanics.
When confronted with a post that is contrary to what a poster likes, believes, or most often wants to be correct, the poster will pick out only minor details that are largely irrelevant in an attempt to shut out the conflicting idea. The core of the post will be left alone since it isn't easy to contradict what the person is actually saying.
When a poster cannot properly refute a post they do not like (as described above), the poster will most likely invent fictitious counter-points and/or begin to attack the other's credibility in feeble ways that are dramatic but irrelevant. Do not underestimate this tactic, as in the online world this will sway many observers. Do not forget: Correctness is decided only by what is said last, the most loudly, or with greatest repetition.
When it comes to computer news, 70% of Internet rumors are outright fabricated, 20% are inaccurate enough to simply be discarded, and about 10% are based in reality. Grains of salt--become familiar with them.
Remember: When debating online, everyone else is ALWAYS wrong if they do not agree with you!
Random Tip o' the Whatever
You just can't win. If your product offers feature A instead of B, people will moan how A is stupid and it didn't offer B. If your product offers B instead of A, they'll likewise complain and rant about how anyone's retarded cousin could figure out A is what the market wants.
Attempt #2:
Doing better, but still unganged. Having trouble with NB overclocking. The same question still stands for voltage, btw, if anyone knows.
As a thread about any computer related subject has its length approach infinity, the likelihood and inevitability of a poorly constructed AMD vs. Intel fight also exponentially increases.
Likewise, the frequency of a car pseudoanalogy to explain a technical concept increases with thread length. This will make many people chuckle, as computer people are rarely knowledgeable about vehicular mechanics.
When confronted with a post that is contrary to what a poster likes, believes, or most often wants to be correct, the poster will pick out only minor details that are largely irrelevant in an attempt to shut out the conflicting idea. The core of the post will be left alone since it isn't easy to contradict what the person is actually saying.
When a poster cannot properly refute a post they do not like (as described above), the poster will most likely invent fictitious counter-points and/or begin to attack the other's credibility in feeble ways that are dramatic but irrelevant. Do not underestimate this tactic, as in the online world this will sway many observers. Do not forget: Correctness is decided only by what is said last, the most loudly, or with greatest repetition.
When it comes to computer news, 70% of Internet rumors are outright fabricated, 20% are inaccurate enough to simply be discarded, and about 10% are based in reality. Grains of salt--become familiar with them.
Remember: When debating online, everyone else is ALWAYS wrong if they do not agree with you!
Random Tip o' the Whatever
You just can't win. If your product offers feature A instead of B, people will moan how A is stupid and it didn't offer B. If your product offers B instead of A, they'll likewise complain and rant about how anyone's retarded cousin could figure out A is what the market wants.
CPU/NB it was around 1.4 iirc on the previous PIIs, I think I remember gotVoltage at 1.5v, definitely worth a quick search on his user name.
The last time I enabled ACC to see what it did I discovered an extra core. No such luck this time-2% All looks promising, +2% All looks promising, either appears to stabilise my cpu at 3.8 with 1.425v set in the bios - I'll investigate further. A short time playing with ACC is not helping at 3.9GHz and the slippery slope of more and more voltage looks unavoidable for the moment.
My 720 hit its sweet spot at the same frequency, something to ponder. 5:30am, time for bed.
+.250 to +.275 is max I would imagine for air, anymore just tosses way to much heat.......
heatware chew*
I've got no strings to hold me down.
To make me fret, or make me frown.
I had strings but now I'm free.
There are no strings on me
@namegt: Can you test your NB max? Thanks
@namegt: Can you test your NB max? Thanks
Thank you. ^ ^;
NB 3200MHz is the maximum air cooling.
1M Pi can not
I'll try a little more testing.
Voltage limit of NB/HT is the same as the CPU = 1.5v
Atleast thats AMDs "recommended" limits.
SweClockers.com
CPU: Phenom II X4 955BE
Clock: 4200MHz 1.4375v
Memory: Dominator GT 2x2GB 1600MHz 6-6-6-20 1.65v
Motherboard: ASUS Crosshair IV Formula
GPU: HD 5770
Have people tried OCing each individual core to see how far they go?
They don't all have to be at 4Ghz...
Perkam
lol
i can prime in vista 64bit for 15 min and i cannot get into xp 32bit at same settings? then i test best acc setting (rofl -6% for xp when for vista it was +6% before??), finally i enter xp, do some super pi, decide to reboot and set a little higher nb and it doesnt boot? cmos clear, afterwards acc on same setting as before no worky?
i went back to vista and to acc disabled for today xD
that rig is playing with me rather then the other way round... dammit.. try to find some good 24/7 first now ^^
1. ASUS Sabertooth 990fx | FX 8320 || 2. DFI DK 790FXB-M3H5 | X4 810
8GB Samsung 30nm DDR3-2000 9-10-10-28 || 4GB PSC DDR3-1333 6-7-6-21
Corsair TX750W | Sapphire 6970 2GB || BeQuiet PurePower 450w | HD 4850
EK Supreme | AC aquagratix | Laing Pro | MoRa 2 || Aircooled
Congratulations for the amazing results...i
Sorry to ask in this thread, but i have a problem to validate my results...
I tryed with many diferent clocks and times but isn t possible
i can run superpi and pifast near than 6200 Mhz, and i noticed that have stability to validate...but i tryed and tryd (i give up...lol)
Another problem is...after i did try to validate at 6221 Mhz and is rejected...all the validations appear with 6221 Mhz (exemple...i did try to validate at 5500 Mhz and saved de cpuz file...but when i tryed to validate it validates (rejected) 6221 Mhz)...
Can somebody tell me what s happened?
Sorry the broken english and thanks for all
Last edited by rbuass; 04-25-2009 at 06:05 AM.
I think that this has happened before...
It's propably due to the fact that the boot speed and tha actual speed is very different, cause u propably used k10stat or AOD to reach that frequency.
I think chew has reported that, and he is more appropriate to answer.
Try booting closer to the validation u try, and do the last mhz with aod or k10stat. I think chew said once 400-500 mhz is the limit before cpuz rejects the validate. So booting at around 5.7-5.8 ghz should fix the problem. If that is possible, and if this is actually your problem.
Cpu:Phenom ΙΙ 965 c3 @ 4.1Ghz/2.8nb (air cooled)
Mobo: Asus M3a79-T Deluxe
Ram:A-data 2x2 800+ @ 1000
Gpu:Asus Hd4850 512mb @ 700/1050(sycthe Musashi)
Hdd:500gb Seagate 7200.11
Psu:Corsair Hx620
Cooling: TRue(dual fan)
Case: Coolermaster Haf 932...
I haven't figured out the magic either. It rejects tons of valid results from everyone. I've NEVER gotten a green submission, just yellow or red.
As a thread about any computer related subject has its length approach infinity, the likelihood and inevitability of a poorly constructed AMD vs. Intel fight also exponentially increases.
Likewise, the frequency of a car pseudoanalogy to explain a technical concept increases with thread length. This will make many people chuckle, as computer people are rarely knowledgeable about vehicular mechanics.
When confronted with a post that is contrary to what a poster likes, believes, or most often wants to be correct, the poster will pick out only minor details that are largely irrelevant in an attempt to shut out the conflicting idea. The core of the post will be left alone since it isn't easy to contradict what the person is actually saying.
When a poster cannot properly refute a post they do not like (as described above), the poster will most likely invent fictitious counter-points and/or begin to attack the other's credibility in feeble ways that are dramatic but irrelevant. Do not underestimate this tactic, as in the online world this will sway many observers. Do not forget: Correctness is decided only by what is said last, the most loudly, or with greatest repetition.
When it comes to computer news, 70% of Internet rumors are outright fabricated, 20% are inaccurate enough to simply be discarded, and about 10% are based in reality. Grains of salt--become familiar with them.
Remember: When debating online, everyone else is ALWAYS wrong if they do not agree with you!
Random Tip o' the Whatever
You just can't win. If your product offers feature A instead of B, people will moan how A is stupid and it didn't offer B. If your product offers B instead of A, they'll likewise complain and rant about how anyone's retarded cousin could figure out A is what the market wants.
Posting Permissions
Reply With Quote
Bookmarks