Windows 7 - What's your experience index?

**rickvtv6** · 02-05-2009, 04:13 AM

Originally Posted by dan7777

i got ..processor 7.5 mem 7.4 graphics card 7.9 gaming graphics 6.5 primary hdd 5.7 this is with new windows 7- 7025 version i installed tonight much better index score than i had with win 7 7000.

hey can i ask where you found this 7025 version? also any1 know when it will be finalized?

good mem score, can you share the specs on it (timing, channels, speed ect?)

**One_Hertz** · 02-09-2009, 10:45 AM

My HDD score is 7.9 with write cache off, 7.8 with cache on

. That's two Intel X25-Es on adaptec 5405 in R0. Boots in about 15 seconds. Friggin XP used to take 30 for some reason.

**swale** · 02-09-2009, 12:05 PM

I scored...

**GTSRboy** · 02-09-2009, 12:50 PM

I turned off write caching on my disk, my HD score went from 3.0-5.9, even when i turned it back on and re-tested it still gave me a 5.9. So my new base score is now 5.5, limited by my RAM

**swale** · 02-09-2009, 01:23 PM

how do you turn it off????

What effect does it have apart from windows score??

**GTSRboy** · 02-09-2009, 08:55 PM

^^Go to your device manager, then find your disk and right click. Then go to policies and uncheck 'enable write caching on this device'

(somone correct me if im wrong)

If you enable it, your writing things to your disks cache, and you disk tells your OS that its done writing even if the info isnt on you HDD yet. If you have a power loss, you will lose data that is in the cache but hasnt been written to the disk yet, and your OS wont know that anything has been lost. So itll never say 'data loss' youll just possibly experiance some bugs if important info was on the cache. Turning it off means it doesnt get written to the cache which means things move faster, aka right to the disk. If you enable it, your system will be faster, but at risk. If you uncheck it, itll be slower (but transfer quicker+Win 7 gives you a higher score) with no risk

**mattd390** · 03-16-2009, 04:49 PM

Here is my wind's rating

**HuffPCair** · 03-16-2009, 05:09 PM

Originally Posted by mattd390

Here is my wind's rating

Please dont tell me your 260 got that rating

**mattd390** · 03-16-2009, 05:25 PM

Originally Posted by HuffPCair

Please dont tell me your 260 got that rating

No bro, it's my MSI Wind's (netbook) rating

. If my 260 got that rating I would yank it out of my system and ship it back to newegg

.

**HuffPCair** · 03-16-2009, 05:29 PM

Originally Posted by mattd390

No bro, it's my MSI Wind's (netbook) rating

. If my 260 got that rating I would yank it out of my system and ship it back to newegg

.

ah ok I guess I should of looked at your sig and saw you had more then one lol

**mattd390** · 03-17-2009, 04:02 AM

Originally Posted by HuffPCair

ah ok I guess I should of looked at your sig and saw you had more then one lol

Easy enough mistake to make with a lot pf people on here

. I finally got my i7 all set so I will install Win 7 on there and see what kind of results I get

.

**cmay119** · 03-17-2009, 03:39 PM

Is a score of 3.0 for a RAID-0 of 2x Seagate Barracuda 250GB 7200.10's normal? Or is there something I can do to increase the score of these drives? The non-oc'd i7 system scores 7.4 for both CPU and Memory. The 7900GT obviously doesn't fair too well on the score with a 5.2 for 3D Business and Gaming Graphics.

Windows 7 x64 Build 7000

**genec57** · 03-21-2009, 03:29 PM

I get a 6.5

Click image for larger version.

Name: Capture.PNG
Views: 1686
Size: 32.9 KB
ID: 96655

**funk32** · 03-21-2009, 04:08 PM

i get a 6.5 right now.. thats because of my 64gbSSD. but my video card is down now so i cant remember what the others were

**cky2k6** · 03-22-2009, 09:20 AM

I get a retarded rating for my video cards... I have no idea how 4870x2 cf is a 6.4

No problems with actual benches either, my 3d scores went up from vista 64.

**genec57** · 03-22-2009, 11:02 AM

That is truly weird when you consider that my 4850 scores 6.5. All this proves is that the Windows Experience Index is worthless as a benchmark. Its sole purpose is as a guide whether or not your system is up to Windows 7 demands. The total score is based, after all, on the single slowest element.

**.Tret** · 03-22-2009, 01:35 PM

Originally Posted by genec57

That is truly weird when you consider that my 4850 scores 6.5. All this proves is that the Windows Experience Index is worthless as a benchmark. Its sole purpose is as a guide whether or not your system is up to Windows 7 demands. The total score is based, after all, on the single slowest element.

This is proof that a single 4850 is better than two 4870's.

My evga gtx 280 ftw gets a 5.7 gaming score btw.

**Parad0x** · 04-25-2009, 02:47 AM

**Easybeat** · 05-02-2009, 01:08 AM

5.8 let down by a fairly non-descript 500Gb WD HDD. Even though my card is 18 months old it gets a 6.0 on Graphics which surprised me a little.

**Cliff Burton** · 05-05-2009, 05:10 PM

Just curious.
I have seen 7.9 marks in all tests but in the Gaming graphics one. Can anyone with a 4890 Tri-CF or GTX285 Tri-SLI on Classified E759 post their score?

**Ancient_1** · 05-06-2009, 11:29 AM

I guess W7 doesn't like 3g of ram. other than the mem score about what I expected.

WEI.jpg

**Pøîñtßlåñk** · 05-06-2009, 12:55 PM

**Hoss331** · 05-06-2009, 05:17 PM

**scottc19** · 05-06-2009, 06:32 PM

**StickyRICE** · 05-14-2009, 02:30 PM

I'll post a screeny later, but two x2s in xfire only got 6.2 lol WTH.

Thread: Windows 7 - What's your experience index?

Thread Tools

Search Thread

Rate This Thread

Display

MSI Wind

Bookmarks

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions