Page 7 of 13 FirstFirst ... 45678910 ... LastLast
Results 151 to 175 of 312

Thread: New 3DMark06 WR with Phenom II X4

  1. #151
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Posts
    124
    @Team Finland
    concrats guy's impressive work !

    Quote Originally Posted by massman View Post
    What's the main purpose of that slip fit?

    The F1 is ideal for the Phenom, really. Never had a 7-8h bench session using not even half of my 35L dewar with intel rigs
    Copper Mass can only be replaced by more Copper Mass

    Hope i can start next week my first Deneb LN2 session with this babys.





    7 Kg copper mass !
    Last edited by monteboy; 02-16-2009 at 01:23 AM.

  2. #152
    Nice Hardware!!!
    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Location
    Finland/Tampere
    Posts
    1,846
    Monteboy.. that is the old way of thinking. It is not working just like that with CPU's and huge heatload from one small spot. You need to have grooves or holes in the base and certain mass. You have to find the right balance.

    Huge mass doesn't help in the top of the pot and huge mass do only harm in the base, cause heat must travel more to be transfered away. Copper is not ideal to hold cold, but it can transfer heat quickly.

    This is the reason why F1 and my own pot are different from these traditional designs.
    You are as good as your samples are!

  3. #153
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Location
    Kansas City
    Posts
    249
    Great job with that score!

  4. #154
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Posts
    124
    Quote Originally Posted by SF3D View Post
    Monteboy.. that is the old way of thinking. It is not working just like that with CPU's and huge heatload from one small spot. You need to have grooves or holes in the base and certain mass. You have to find the right balance.

    Huge mass doesn't help in the top of the pot and huge mass do only harm in the base, cause heat must travel more to be transfered away. Copper is not ideal to hold cold, but it can transfer heat quickly.

    This is the reason why F1 and my own pot are different from these traditional designs.
    Copper is even better to hold cold as aluminium. I agree it is importent to find right balance but for what application (CPU) ?

    With a massive copper pot on Intel chips you have two problems :

    - first if you run in cold bug. It takes lot of time until the pot warm up.
    - second problem you need more LN2 to cool this monster pot down.

    On Deneb you don't have this two main problems.

    Once you cool this massive copper down your LN2 comsumption would be slightly because no coldbug. Only what you need is to hold up -185°C

    And as far as I can see for this application the main think should be mass.

    3 stairs and 16mm (diameter) nipple


    Phenom II Die Size is 258mm² and the area form nipple is 201.062mm² , i agree a little to small for this CPU.
    Perhaps it is time to think about a new Base for my pot

    We will see how the old way of thinking perform
    Last edited by monteboy; 02-16-2009 at 02:55 AM.

  5. #155
    I am Xtreme
    Join Date
    Jan 2005
    Posts
    4,714
    The F1 currently has enough mass to hold the load of the Deneb well enough, so I don't think more mass is needed. Imho, designers should be working on a container that allow the container to go faster to -185°C, but has the same mass to keep the load
    Where courage, motivation and ignorance meet, a persistent idiot awakens.

  6. #156
    Banned
    Join Date
    Nov 2008
    Posts
    335
    I ain't no ln2 pot guru, but have you guys tried creating small holes inside the pots on the smooth surface to increase surface area which is in contact with LN2? Much like a cpu waterblock has raised fins inside to increase surface area and heat exchange but in reverse?

  7. #157
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Posts
    124
    Quote Originally Posted by massman View Post
    The F1 currently has enough mass to hold the load of the Deneb well enough, so I don't think more mass is needed. Imho, designers should be working on a container that allow the container to go faster to -185°C, but has the same mass to keep the load
    Nobody said that F1 did'nt have enough mass. F1 is a great pot.
    In some sessions with my friend joe_cool (F1 owner) i had a chance to compare with the Undertaker So i know very well what this pot's could perform

  8. #158
    Nice Hardware!!!
    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Location
    Finland/Tampere
    Posts
    1,846
    Too much mass in the base will still be a problem, even if you are using Deneb. If you start for example Wprime 1024 and watch the temps, you can see, that it will be stable first and then it is starting to get warmer and warmer.. If your base is not balanced right, you can't do nothing. You have a full pot of LN2 and the temperature is still raising up. Very light applications will not suffer from this and heavy pot might work well.

    Monteboy- Let us know how it is working.

    In general, everyone should remember to check how well the sensor + thermometer can read temperatures.. I have three different sensors and only one is reading correctly at -196C. Othe one show -160C and one -175C
    You are as good as your samples are!

  9. #159
    Banned
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Posts
    197
    Impressive results Team Finland Now freeze those cards and perhaps with hard pushing 36K...

    AMD back on top, i like

  10. #160
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Posts
    124
    Quote Originally Posted by SF3D View Post
    Too much mass in the base will still be a problem, even if you are using Deneb. If you start for example Wprime 1024 and watch the temps, you can see, that it will be stable first and then it is starting to get warmer and warmer.. If your base is not balanced right, you can't do nothing. You have a full pot of LN2 and the temperature is still raising up. Very light applications will not suffer from this and heavy pot might work well.

    Monteboy- Let us know how it is working.

    In general, everyone should remember to check how well the sensor + thermometer can read temperatures.. I have three different sensors and only one is reading correctly at -196C. Othe one show -160C and one -175C
    PT100 is the Answer for you.

    I'will present soon a selfmade 5-channel - thermometer based on PT100 resistor/sensors with cheap components. What we need here is not exactly measurement.
    It is importand to receive fast response time and therefor PT100 is better than K-Type.

    I think your thermometers are designed for K-type
    Last edited by monteboy; 02-16-2009 at 04:06 AM.

  11. #161
    Banned
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Posts
    197
    Quote Originally Posted by monteboy View Post
    PT100 is the Answer for you.

    I'will present soon a selfmade 5-channel - thermometer based on PT100 resistor/sensors with cheap components. What we need here is not exactly measurement.
    It is importand to receive fast response time and therefor PT100 is better than K-Type.
    Paired with this

  12. #162
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Posts
    124
    Quote Originally Posted by FoamGlass View Post
    Paired with this
    I'am a poor man
    Don't have enough money for that

    Prefer, to build it in may way and write also the Monitoring software.

    This Thermometer project will be specially developed for LN2-cooling measurement (-200 .... -50°C)

    simple cheap components :
    operational amplifiers
    cheap 8-bit AD-converter
    small ceramic PT100 - resistors
    Last edited by monteboy; 02-16-2009 at 04:29 AM.

  13. #163
    Banned
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Posts
    197
    Quote Originally Posted by monteboy View Post
    I'am a poor man
    Don't have enough money for that

    Prefer, to build it in may way and write also the Monitoring software.
    Yeah it costs a bit, in may case i could get it for free due my work. But it would be could to have this device controling your LN2 flow with a valve or anything compatible with an LN2 dewar..

    anyhow nevermind offtopic

  14. #164
    Xtreme X.I.P.
    Join Date
    Jun 2004
    Location
    France
    Posts
    1,368
    Impressive freq & score , congratz for your oveclocking SF3D , Sampsa & Macci
    OCM Member / IXTREMTEK Admin !!



    DDR1 2*256 BH5 Adata @324.7Mhz 1.5/2/2/5 1T at 4v @318.6Mhz Benchs
    DDR2 1*512 Kingston Pc8500 @702Mhz 5/5/5/18 at 2.42v réel
    DDR2 2*1024 Cell Shock Pc8000c4 @534Mhz 3/3/3/8 at 3.5v réel

    Cooling : XP90C , Big Typhoon , waterchiller R507 , LN2 ....

  15. #165
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Posts
    124
    Quote Originally Posted by FoamGlass View Post
    Yeah it costs a bit, in may case i could get it for free due my work. But it would be could to have this device controling your LN2 flow with a valve or anything compatible with an LN2 dewar..

    anyhow nevermind offtopic
    you have seen my LN2-Control on AOCM2 ?



    I use conventional valves the next version should be better
    Ln2 valves are expensive !

    In combination with this cheap selfmade PT100-thermometer this could be a nice equipment
    Last edited by monteboy; 02-16-2009 at 04:45 AM.

  16. #166
    Banned
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Posts
    197
    Quote Originally Posted by monteboy View Post
    you have seen my LN2-Control on AOCM2 ?



    I use conventional valves the next version should be better
    Wow sweet

  17. #167
    Nice Hardware!!!
    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Location
    Finland/Tampere
    Posts
    1,846
    Guys.. the storm is coming tomorrow.. I can feel it in my bones
    You are as good as your samples are!

  18. #168
    Xtreme Mentor
    Join Date
    Nov 2005
    Location
    Devon
    Posts
    3,437
    Quote Originally Posted by SF3D View Post
    Guys.. the storm is coming tomorrow.. I can feel it in my bones
    And it was such a lovely day today, who would think that storm is coming?

    I hope after the storm it will be like this (LN2)


    or if LHe involved, then like this



    PS. Winter in Poland, Europe. First picture presents a car
    Last edited by Lightman; 02-16-2009 at 01:22 PM.
    RiG1: Ryzen 7 1700 @4.0GHz 1.39V, Asus X370 Prime, G.Skill RipJaws 2x8GB 3200MHz CL14 Samsung B-die, TuL Vega 56 Stock, Samsung SS805 100GB SLC SDD (OS Drive) + 512GB Evo 850 SSD (2nd OS Drive) + 3TB Seagate + 1TB Seagate, BeQuiet PowerZone 1000W

    RiG2: HTPC AMD A10-7850K APU, 2x8GB Kingstone HyperX 2400C12, AsRock FM2A88M Extreme4+, 128GB SSD + 640GB Samsung 7200, LG Blu-ray Recorder, Thermaltake BACH, Hiper 4M880 880W PSU

    SmartPhone Samsung Galaxy S7 EDGE
    XBONE paired with 55'' Samsung LED 3D TV

  19. #169
    OCTeamHungary™
    Join Date
    Sep 2006
    Location
    Hungary
    Posts
    509
    who cares the car, tell us more about second picture

  20. #170
    ¿
    Join Date
    Jul 2003
    Posts
    4,772
    Quote Originally Posted by macci View Post
    poured in the last drop halfway thru Canyon flight and the pot was empty at the end of that test.
    Was it full @ the beginning of the test?

  21. #171
    I am Xtreme FlanK3r's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Location
    Czech republic
    Posts
    6,823
    yes.. who is a girl on second photo :-)? She looks good as Phenom II X4 945 :-D
    ROG Power PCs - Intel and AMD
    CPUs:i9-7900X, i9-9900K, i7-6950X, i7-5960X, i7-8086K, i7-8700K, 4x i7-7700K, i3-7350K, 2x i7-6700K, i5-6600K, R7-2700X, 4x R5 2600X, R5 2400G, R3 1200, R7-1800X, R7-1700X, 3x AMD FX-9590, 1x AMD FX-9370, 4x AMD FX-8350,1x AMD FX-8320,1x AMD FX-8300, 2x AMD FX-6300,2x AMD FX-4300, 3x AMD FX-8150, 2x AMD FX-8120 125 and 95W, AMD X2 555 BE, AMD x4 965 BE C2 and C3, AMD X4 970 BE, AMD x4 975 BE, AMD x4 980 BE, AMD X6 1090T BE, AMD X6 1100T BE, A10-7870K, Athlon 845, Athlon 860K,AMD A10-7850K, AMD A10-6800K, A8-6600K, 2x AMD A10-5800K, AMD A10-5600K, AMD A8-3850, AMD A8-3870K, 2x AMD A64 3000+, AMD 64+ X2 4600+ EE, Intel i7-980X, Intel i7-2600K, Intel i7-3770K,2x i7-4770K, Intel i7-3930KAMD Cinebench R10 challenge AMD Cinebench R15 thread Intel Cinebench R15 thread

  22. #172
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    Nov 2003
    Location
    Oslo, Norway
    Posts
    1,218
    shes old, and she has a burberry bag
    Last edited by dpa; 02-16-2009 at 03:13 PM.

  23. #173
    Xtreme Cruncher
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Posts
    121
    If you run out of ln2 during the bench, just start shoveling some of that snow in the pots and hope you make it long enough to finish and save your wr's.

  24. #174
    Xtreme Legend
    Join Date
    Mar 2005
    Location
    Australia
    Posts
    17,242
    Andre

    I am a bit depressed about overclocking circles as of late and have been taking some R&R this summer.

    I hope that some of the smart overclockers here will refrain from side taking and protect what we all hold dear and what all the big companies dont get. I have absolutely nothing against any of these companies being a part of our circles but when it comes to affecting our competition I feel depressed. It is getting out of hand.

    We need to engage HWBOT or XS or form a new body that would work towards forming a strict, independent and rigid platform which to follow to protect overclocking as a sport from desparate manufacturers one upping eachother over our backs.

    I think we should be more agressive about this then we've ever been. Not only is it not good enough to claim a W.R. on unreleased hardware we should completely stop engineering samples being accepted particularly CPU and GFX manufacturers as they make the biggest impact on scores and any other in future that will significantly affect benching (i.e. HDD manufacturers with PCMARK suite for example). The reason why i think ES hardware has to stop entering our competition specifically is primarity to manufacturer superbinnig we have seen from both Intel and AMD in particular from their latest core i7 and Ph2 platforms.

    A superbin chip is not a normal ES........these are chips a cut above the rest where no retail or almost impossible to be 100% confident of finding another chip like that from retail sample of say 20 chips and personally binning them. I think both manufacturers have used their binning power to give Ocers access to chips far better than that which we have never had happen before. i knew i could go and find a better retail E6700 or E6600 than the absolute best ES CPUs that came out only shortly after release. This is NOT the case with i7 for example and AMD from what i can see as well.

    We should prevent scores from being accepted by manufacturers or their employees. This is different from people receiving hardware to bench as long as it doesnt become another avenue for manufacturers to feed their hardware....in that case it could get more complicated and people getting extremely good overclocks against other benchmarkers could be one sign of "manufacturer seeding" behaviour which should be stopped

    I reckon since this is becoming so professional now as Charles said recently that we should then treat it as such. Other professional sports have super comprehensive rules & penalties over their sport so should we no? We should create new categories of benching in addition to current ones where users are encouraged to get the most out of the system.........lots of examples like 32M SuperPi challenge and many 3DMARK challenges created by legends like Vince and others wanting to see how we all stack up with same set of rules. How about low budget challenges we had as well....that was a massive hit and lots of fun.....This enables a lot more people to participate as well and some new names have surfaced showing off enormous skill that would have otherwise gone unnoticed with wallet battle style comp we are a part of right now.

    This would also create a good platform for international competitions as currently they just cannot be created fairly due to not all hardware being created equal and being absolutely impossible to bin it to all be the same.

    We should probably look at some disclosure related clauses as well in terms of hardware support and general support being received from manufacturers as well to improve transparency and promote openness.

    I know that there will be a lot of people huffing and puffing about my post here but i tell you what DONT post a response, think about it, sleep on it and then think about it some more. i know i have for the last coupe of months. I am sure you will see where i'm coming from and try to deal with this constructively

    Dino
    Team.AU
    Got tube?
    GIGABYTE Australia
    Need a GIGABYTE bios or support?



  25. #175
    Xtreme Legend
    Join Date
    Mar 2005
    Location
    Australia
    Posts
    17,242
    sorry fellas for the thread hijack

    monster CPU to say the least

    liquid helium will gain how much?? 200MHz
    man freeze those cards and show the real results heh

    Quote Originally Posted by Lightman View Post
    or if LHe involved, then like this



    PS. Winter in Poland, Europe. First picture presents a car
    holy
    look at that snow

    life is hard in Sydney i have to say my foot sunbathing on one of the beaches close to that shark attack hahahah



    summer rules
    Team.AU
    Got tube?
    GIGABYTE Australia
    Need a GIGABYTE bios or support?



Page 7 of 13 FirstFirst ... 45678910 ... LastLast

Bookmarks

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •