MMM
Page 4 of 5 FirstFirst 12345 LastLast
Results 76 to 100 of 116

Thread: TITAN SSD Performance Review

  1. #76
    Xtreme Enthusiast
    Join Date
    Jan 2005
    Posts
    674
    Quote Originally Posted by Brahmzy View Post
    For those of you JUST getting SSDs for your OS, think twice. I had 3 screaming VRs in RAID0 where all of my games and apps lives, in addition to my OS. Well, I've got only TWO Titans now and my games load so freaking fast in comparison, it's ridiculous.

    Moral of the story: RAID0'd SSDs are not only great for your OS, they're friggin' fantastic for your games and other apps too.

    So after over a week of ownership with these Titans on an ICH10R, I am very pleased. No slowdowns, no stuttering... just snappiness.
    what games are you seeing the improvements on? any specific numbers?
    most reviews don't show that much improvement in game loading times
    http://techreport.com/articles.x/16291/5
    http://www.anandtech.com/cpuchipsets...px?i=3403&p=14
    ....

  2. #77
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    Sep 2006
    Location
    UK/East Sussex
    Posts
    355
    Quote Originally Posted by Ender17 View Post
    what games are you seeing the improvements on? any specific numbers?
    most reviews don't show that much improvement in game loading times
    http://techreport.com/articles.x/16291/5
    http://www.anandtech.com/cpuchipsets...px?i=3403&p=14
    it's the placebo effect
    let him enjoy it

  3. #78
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    Oct 2007
    Posts
    264
    ^^ That could be said for anything. Going from QX9650 to a i7 965 could be said the same too, but SSD's are faster than mechanical drives, no point in bi%@hing about it.

    Anyways Im thinking about going for just one Intel X25-m for OS and 2 games on it (prob crysis and whatever game im playing at the time) and then put media and WoW on the VR.

    I might RAID later but Id rather not deal with the hassle- as I never saw a faster perf when I had 2 Raptors in RAID0 vs one.

  4. #79
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    Dec 2002
    Posts
    1,250
    Quote Originally Posted by btdvox View Post
    ^^ That could be said for anything. Going from QX9650 to a i7 965 could be said the same too, but SSD's are faster than mechanical drives, no point in bi%@hing about it.

    Anyways Im thinking about going for just one Intel X25-m for OS and 2 games on it (prob crysis and whatever game im playing at the time) and then put media and WoW on the VR.

    I might RAID later but Id rather not deal with the hassle- as I never saw a faster perf when I had 2 Raptors in RAID0 vs one.
    To be fair and correct, there is not all party and glory with ssd.
    Some aspects mechanical harddrives still beats ssd hands down.
    However, for gamers, light desktop users, ssd wins with big margins.
    4670k 4.6ghz 1.22v watercooled CPU/GPU - Asus Z87-A - 290 1155mhz/1250mhz - Kingston Hyper Blu 8gb -crucial 128gb ssd - EyeFunity 5040x1050 120hz - CM atcs840 - Corsair 750w -sennheiser hd600 headphones - Asus essence stx - G400 and steelseries 6v2 -windows 8 Pro 64bit Best OS used - - 9500p 3dmark11 (one of the 26% that isnt confused on xtreme forums)

  5. #80
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Posts
    146


    I'll be using 1 for my OS, and the other 3 are for sales laptops, but I'll set 3 up on striped RAID on my ICH9 before doing so. Downloading Windows 7 as I type this and prepping my existing 640 7200.11s for backup and firmware update.

    1 Drive performance...............sorry all I have is HDTune



    This was booting off my old Matrix RAID 640's..........firwmare upgrade went fine btw.
    Last edited by MassiveOverkill; 02-04-2009 at 05:48 PM.
    MSI 890GXM-G65
    LAN Gear MOM
    Phenom II 1055T 3.8 Ghz 1.4V Batch 1015DPAW
    Corsair H50 w/120x38
    Asus 5850CU 1000/1125
    4x2048 OCZ DDR3 1600 Obsidian
    Western Digital WD1002FAEX
    GSkill Titan 128 gig SSD
    Silverstone SST 75F-P
    3DMark06 21837
    http://service.futuremark.com/compare?3dm06=13974577

  6. #81
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    May 2006
    Posts
    1,315
    Quote Originally Posted by MassiveOverkill View Post
    I'll be using 1 for my OS, and the other 3 are for sales laptops, but I'll set 3 up on striped RAID on my ICH9 before doing so. Downloading Windows 7 as I type this and prepping my existing 640 7200.11s for backup and firmware update.

    1 Drive performance...............sorry all I have is HDTune



    This was booting off my old Matrix RAID 640's..........firwmare upgrade when fine btw.
    Yum, I like two more please.

    Quote Originally Posted by Ender17 View Post
    what games are you seeing the improvements on? any specific numbers?
    most reviews don't show that much improvement in game loading times
    http://techreport.com/articles.x/16291/5
    http://www.anandtech.com/cpuchipsets...px?i=3403&p=14
    As I said in my post, I said level LOADING TIMES. Crysis Warhead, Crysis, FO3, FC2 etc... and no I'm not going to take the time to stopwatch 'em now because I didn't get a baseline.
    If you doubt what I'm saying, I can't help ya. I'm just reporting what I'm experiencing.

    Quote Originally Posted by karateo View Post
    it's the placebo effect
    let him enjoy it
    Y'all are funny. Why the need to hate? Are you using the hardware I'm using to make that statement? No placebo here - that typically comes immediately after an upgrade. This is weeks later. And I've been doing this crap FAR too long to fall to the placebo. My OCD knows the truth.
    Last edited by Brahmzy; 02-03-2009 at 09:57 AM.
    MAIN: 4770K 4.6 | Max VI Hero | 16GB 2400/C10 | H110 | 2 GTX670 FTW SLi | 2 840 Pro 256 R0 | SB Z | 750D | AX1200 | 305T | 8.1x64
    HTPC: 4670K 4.4 | Max VI Gene | 8GB 2133/C9 | NH-L9I | HD6450 | 840 Pro 128 | 2TB Red | GD05 | SSR-550RM | 70" | 8.1x64
    MEDIA: 4670K 4.4 | Gryphon | 8GB 1866/C9 | VX Black | HD4600 | 840 Pro 128 | 4 F4 HD204UI R5 | 550D | SSR-550RM | 245BW | 8.1x64

  7. #82
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    Sep 2006
    Location
    UK/East Sussex
    Posts
    355
    Quote Originally Posted by Brahmzy View Post
    Y'all are funny. Why the need to hate? Are you using the hardware I'm using to make that statement? No placebo here - that typically comes immediately after an upgrade. This is weeks later. And I've been doing this crap FAR too long to fall to the placebo. My OCD knows the truth.
    just joking man
    but i doubt there is much of improvement in games.
    and most reviews site would love to show such and improvement (you know what I mean )

    but i don't doubt that ssd drives are insanely fast

  8. #83
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    May 2006
    Posts
    1,315
    Quote Originally Posted by karateo View Post
    just joking man
    but i doubt there is much of improvement in games.
    and most reviews site would love to show such and improvement (you know what I mean )

    but i don't doubt that ssd drives are insanely fast
    Ok, thanks for clarifying it was a joke. Let me clarify something again. I never said the games themselves were any faster. We all know that has little to do with storage unless extreme reading or paging is occuring.

    I specifically said these SSDs are a LOT faster LOADING game levels than my 3 Velociraptors were. And the benches show why. Games levels/textures are typically lots of fairly decent size files, where RAID0 shines at reading. This is what I was saying. Ok, I think we've covered it.

    So tempted to order a 3rd TITAN... I think I will as soon as the next price drop hits 'em.
    MAIN: 4770K 4.6 | Max VI Hero | 16GB 2400/C10 | H110 | 2 GTX670 FTW SLi | 2 840 Pro 256 R0 | SB Z | 750D | AX1200 | 305T | 8.1x64
    HTPC: 4670K 4.4 | Max VI Gene | 8GB 2133/C9 | NH-L9I | HD6450 | 840 Pro 128 | 2TB Red | GD05 | SSR-550RM | 70" | 8.1x64
    MEDIA: 4670K 4.4 | Gryphon | 8GB 1866/C9 | VX Black | HD4600 | 840 Pro 128 | 4 F4 HD204UI R5 | 550D | SSR-550RM | 245BW | 8.1x64

  9. #84
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    Sep 2006
    Location
    UK/East Sussex
    Posts
    355
    calm down on those titans!

    hold on to get titan II in summer or next year
    i don't believe that a 3rd titan will make any difference!

  10. #85
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    Sep 2006
    Location
    UK/East Sussex
    Posts
    355
    calm down on those titans!

    hold on to get titan II in summer or next year
    i don't believe that a 3rd titan will make any difference!

  11. #86
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Posts
    375
    Reading this makes me want to get my second titan, but I got the 256g version and running it as a single drive now, and I gotta say its damn fast for primary os drive. I can multitask on this thing like no other, and definatly huge difference between this and my single vr.
    i7 940/Rampage 2 Extreme/Corsair 6g Dominator/Corsair HX100W/GTX 580/SSD

  12. #87
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    Jun 2007
    Posts
    354
    I have had my RAID 0 with two Titan 128s running for almost a week now.
    I can say, as others have before me, that this is the single best upgrade that I have made in years. Loading of everything from windows 7 through flt. sim. are faster than I have ever experienced. I get a file transfer rate approaching 400 mb/sec.
    Everything feels snappier and smoother. I couldn't be happier
    i7 920 DO 3850A849 @4410 under custom water.
    Asus P6T deluxe V2
    3X2gb Mushkin DDR3 1600 998691
    Sapphire 4870 1g
    Corsair Hx 850 psu
    2 G.Skill titan 128gb SSDs in RAID0 Data
    Intel X25-M OS drive
    Windows 7 Home Premium 64

  13. #88
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    May 2006
    Posts
    1,315
    Quote Originally Posted by genec57 View Post
    I have had my RAID 0 with two Titan 128s running for almost a week now.
    I can say, as others have before me, that this is the single best upgrade that I have made in years. Loading of everything from windows 7 through flt. sim. are faster than I have ever experienced. I get a file transfer rate approaching 400 mb/sec.
    Everything feels snappier and smoother. I couldn't be happier
    Amen brutha. Very happy... loved my Velociraptors, but they had to go...
    MAIN: 4770K 4.6 | Max VI Hero | 16GB 2400/C10 | H110 | 2 GTX670 FTW SLi | 2 840 Pro 256 R0 | SB Z | 750D | AX1200 | 305T | 8.1x64
    HTPC: 4670K 4.4 | Max VI Gene | 8GB 2133/C9 | NH-L9I | HD6450 | 840 Pro 128 | 2TB Red | GD05 | SSR-550RM | 70" | 8.1x64
    MEDIA: 4670K 4.4 | Gryphon | 8GB 1866/C9 | VX Black | HD4600 | 840 Pro 128 | 4 F4 HD204UI R5 | 550D | SSR-550RM | 245BW | 8.1x64

  14. #89
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Feb 2009
    Location
    Seattle
    Posts
    2
    Does anyone have any feedback after using a Titan for about a month? It looks like there's more than their fair share of failures out there...

  15. #90
    Xtreme Mentor dengyong's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2006
    Location
    A great place again
    Posts
    2,589
    I get weird results with my 128GB titan on ICH10R. (windows 7 64 bit)
    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	1x128GBtitanICH10R.7.jpg 
Views:	351 
Size:	164.3 KB 
ID:	94111
    2x60GB ocz core v2 in raid 0 on ICH10R for comparison. (windows 7 64 bit)
    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	2x60GBv2onICH10R.jpg 
Views:	351 
Size:	174.8 KB 
ID:	94112
    Small file performance sucks on the titan. (vista 64 bit, same in windows 7)
    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	titan first run.jpg 
Views:	347 
Size:	65.2 KB 
ID:	94110

  16. #91
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    Jun 2007
    Posts
    354
    That would be close to the results I was seeing until I turned on write caching. Results of all benchies were dramatically increased.
    i7 920 DO 3850A849 @4410 under custom water.
    Asus P6T deluxe V2
    3X2gb Mushkin DDR3 1600 998691
    Sapphire 4870 1g
    Corsair Hx 850 psu
    2 G.Skill titan 128gb SSDs in RAID0 Data
    Intel X25-M OS drive
    Windows 7 Home Premium 64

  17. #92
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    May 2006
    Posts
    1,315
    Quote Originally Posted by louden View Post
    Does anyone have any feedback after using a Titan for about a month? It looks like there's more than their fair share of failures out there...
    Post #1??? Failures? Troll? Where are you hearing about failures?
    MAIN: 4770K 4.6 | Max VI Hero | 16GB 2400/C10 | H110 | 2 GTX670 FTW SLi | 2 840 Pro 256 R0 | SB Z | 750D | AX1200 | 305T | 8.1x64
    HTPC: 4670K 4.4 | Max VI Gene | 8GB 2133/C9 | NH-L9I | HD6450 | 840 Pro 128 | 2TB Red | GD05 | SSR-550RM | 70" | 8.1x64
    MEDIA: 4670K 4.4 | Gryphon | 8GB 1866/C9 | VX Black | HD4600 | 840 Pro 128 | 4 F4 HD204UI R5 | 550D | SSR-550RM | 245BW | 8.1x64

  18. #93
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    Oct 2007
    Posts
    264
    Quote Originally Posted by Brahmzy View Post
    Post #1??? Failures? Troll? Where are you hearing about failures?
    lol he was asking a legitimate question... why are you so hostile? but it would be nice if louden can get a source b4 stating failures out there.

  19. #94
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    May 2005
    Location
    Sugar Land, TX
    Posts
    1,418
    This whole thing is like the Intel/AMD all over again
    Last edited by ewitte; 02-04-2009 at 02:05 PM.

  20. #95
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    May 2006
    Posts
    1,315
    It is a bit ridiculous....

    Quote Originally Posted by btdvox View Post
    lol he was asking a legitimate question... why are you so hostile? but it would be nice if louden can get a source b4 stating failures out there.
    I haven't heard of a single failure and I've been researching anything and everything TITAN. As far as we know this first post could be from a competing SSD vendor. Don't think that crap doesn't happen. It happens all of the time. One "rumor" of failures could turn into 10's of thousands of dollars lost or made... FUD at work...
    Last edited by Brahmzy; 02-04-2009 at 02:03 PM.
    MAIN: 4770K 4.6 | Max VI Hero | 16GB 2400/C10 | H110 | 2 GTX670 FTW SLi | 2 840 Pro 256 R0 | SB Z | 750D | AX1200 | 305T | 8.1x64
    HTPC: 4670K 4.4 | Max VI Gene | 8GB 2133/C9 | NH-L9I | HD6450 | 840 Pro 128 | 2TB Red | GD05 | SSR-550RM | 70" | 8.1x64
    MEDIA: 4670K 4.4 | Gryphon | 8GB 1866/C9 | VX Black | HD4600 | 840 Pro 128 | 4 F4 HD204UI R5 | 550D | SSR-550RM | 245BW | 8.1x64

  21. #96
    Xtreme Mentor dengyong's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2006
    Location
    A great place again
    Posts
    2,589
    Quote Originally Posted by ewitte View Post
    This whole thing is like the Intel/AMD all over again
    How so ?

  22. #97
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    May 2005
    Location
    Sugar Land, TX
    Posts
    1,418
    Quote Originally Posted by dengyong View Post
    How so ?
    Both sides are starting to flame the other.

  23. #98
    Xtreme Mentor
    Join Date
    May 2006
    Location
    Croatia
    Posts
    2,542
    What failures, the drives just got to the market...?
    Quote Originally Posted by LexDiamonds View Post
    Anti-Virus software is for n00bs.

  24. #99
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    Sep 2006
    Location
    UK/East Sussex
    Posts
    355
    Quote Originally Posted by Brahmzy View Post
    I haven't heard of a single failure and I've been researching anything and everything TITAN. As far as we know this first post could be from a competing SSD vendor. Don't think that crap doesn't happen. It happens all of the time. One "rumor" of failures could turn into 10's of thousands of dollars lost or made... FUD at work...
    sorry but i don't get it
    1) why do you bother which company earns and which loses?
    2) how do we know that everything you said is BS and you just want to advertise the product.

    I don't want to say anything else, apart from that as you don't know anything about that person a few posts above, we don't know anything about you.
    We take nothing for granted.
    There much be another fifty of you to persuade me that the titans work withouts problems in raid 0.

    And don't say anything about competition as i just got banned from OCZ forums for posts in XS forums

  25. #100
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Posts
    146
    UPDATE:







    128KB test



    Same test after rebooting



    4MB test



    4KB test



    HDTach

    MSI 890GXM-G65
    LAN Gear MOM
    Phenom II 1055T 3.8 Ghz 1.4V Batch 1015DPAW
    Corsair H50 w/120x38
    Asus 5850CU 1000/1125
    4x2048 OCZ DDR3 1600 Obsidian
    Western Digital WD1002FAEX
    GSkill Titan 128 gig SSD
    Silverstone SST 75F-P
    3DMark06 21837
    http://service.futuremark.com/compare?3dm06=13974577

Page 4 of 5 FirstFirst 12345 LastLast

Bookmarks

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •