You see Gary, this is where the problem lies:
People rush to conclusions very fast, sometimes ignoring the facts and common logic, and due to the blindfolded fanboyism can't even read the charts properly and start bashing the "intel/nvidia/via/cyrix biased site"... it's not a FFT calculation guys, it's a damn chart.
It doesn't take more than a few seconds to realize that the charts are sorted by the average FPS value people.
5 seconds...
Yeap, exactly that.
Not everybody, but the thread starter and some members did.
Well...
So... which side is the reviewer on in your opinion ?
First they do say that between the Phenom II and the Core 2 Quad the Phenom performed better and the gameplay was smoother.
Then they also say that the Core i7 performed better than the Phenom II, and that they were butter-smooth both except in C.O.H. where the Intel had some stuttering.
People tend to reject reality and lay off to a simple ( and lame ) excuse... call the author a fanboy and it's a done deal.
Nice.
You ( the readers ) doubt most if not all the reviewers on the web & the magazines.
You also doubt various consumers ( buyers, simple users, not reviewers or people affiliated with a company in any way ) and members of this and other forums.
So... who do you trust ? Let me answer this question for you ( generally speaking, not specifically for you ):
the one that comes to a conclusion that you like.
In this case the world would be better off without any hardware reviews websites & user reviews on the net.
Just stop posting reviews on the net. And have fun.
News flash!
Thread title = PII vs. Q9550 vs i7, Phenom II = smoother
Now everyone with common sense with some education ( third class ?) can figure out what the thread title means.
It's saying
"Phenom II against the Q9550 and the i7, the Phenom II is smoother".
^
Do you ?
So... in your own gaming experience, going from 50fps to 25fps is smoother than going from 50fps to 32fps ? [ just an example ].
Are you trying to convince yourself ?
Because AnandTech is saying:
Originally Posted by Conclusions from AnandTech's article








The NB speed was set to 2486MHz, the fastest I could run it in Vista 64 and keep that CPU speed.
have you even read a post yet? and for your info this is me when i read posts like yours:
) can figure out what the thread title means.
), Juan J. Guerrero


Bookmarks