AMD To Crank Up Phenom II Clock-Speeds Upto 3.50 GHz, Planning New Models

[kemo]

Which is wrong as the stock cooler has to handle stock volts which was the original point for comments about AMD releasing a 3.5 stock CPU.
He was basically saying that its very unlikely & we were just informing that in fact that is not so.

Would you generously share your load temperatures @ 3.5GHZ with stock voltages 64bit OS prime using OCCT Linpack in a hot ambient lets say 30c room temperature and bad ventilated case along with stock TIM

[AbelJemka]

Would you generously share your load temperatures @ 3.5GHZ with stock voltages 64bit OS prime using OCCT Linpack in a hot ambient lets say 30c room temperature and bad ventilated case along with stock TIM

Same for i7
PhII + 30°C

[Final8ty]

Would you generously share your load temperatures @ 3.5GHZ with stock voltages 64bit OS prime using OCCT Linpack in a hot ambient lets say 30c room temperature and bad ventilated case along with stock TIM

LOL

[M_Isobe]

This news has been proved to be fake.
http://news-amd.de/

31.01.2009 - Fake - AMD Phenom II X4 Roadmap (AM3) ein Fake
Die Informationen der Insiderquellen waren ein Fake. Deshalb muss News-AMD.de die Informationen von gestern zurückziehen. Es erschien auch unlogisch von der Namensgebung her. AMD hat bisher den AMD Phenom II X4 925 und 945 vorgestellt, die mit 2,8 GHz bzw. 3,0 GHz takten. Deshalb würden die neuen CPUs gar nicht in das Namensschema passen. Deshalb verweist News-AMD.de auf den Artikel vom 19.01.2009, der eine logisches Namensschema zeigt, welches jedoch nur auf reiner Intuition basiert.

[English translation by Google]
The sources of insider information was a fake. Therefore, news AMD.de information from the retreat yesterday. It was also illogical by naming her. AMD has the AMD Phenom X4 II 925 and 945, which with 2.8 GHz and 3.0 GHz clock. Therefore, the new CPUs do not fit the naming scheme. Therefore news AMD.de refers to the article dated 19.01.2009, which is a logical naming scheme shows that only based on pure intuition.

[kemo]

LOL

Doh , i forgot to mention that you should leave it to dust for three months

here is my E8400 as received from the company without any modifications + 2 months of dust

Distance to TJ-Max 15C on core 0

[Final8ty]

Doh , i forgot to mention that you should leave it to dust for three months

here is my E8400 as received from the company without any modifications + 2 months of dust

Distance to TJ-Max 15C on core 0

An Enthusiast should know better then to have a badly ventilated, internal dust covered case.

The CPU makers never say how bad them factors are tolerated for within the specs

[kemo]

An Enthusiast should know better then to have a badly ventilated, internal dust covered case.

The CPU makers never say how bad them factors are tolerated for within the specs

Yeap , but Enthusiast to others are like 1:1000 and that is how they keep things going , in my university for example they never clean the systems from dust and some of them are 4 years old , what is valid for us is not valid for them that is why the CPU will not throttle until it goes to 100C or even more and they have to make sure that it will keep working after such abuse (make me think about taking Core temp + prime 95 and abuse my university systems even more ) ,,, and BTW as an Enthusiast after cleaning and TIM + OC the CPU was running 10C cooler