
Originally Posted by
keithlm
Luckily the PHII has no problem with beating the Q9400. Now it is actually pushing the Q9550 around in performance. But the PHII has a better architecture. Go figure. But the Q series chips use an older obsolete design.
Of course then you'll still see the "clock per clock" argument. But that was not valid even when it was first brought up.
You must compare chips that COST about the same. Period. If one is clocked slower... WHO CARES. Does one chip beat the other. Answer yes or no now. DON'T WAIT FOR THE TRANSLATION.
Especially when one overclocks more than the other; to the point that any "clock per clock" argument means absolutely nothing. What can the PHII do versus the Q9550 on good cooling.
Sorry I am into my cups tonight. But I still can't swallow the tripe we are fed by some of these people.
Bookmarks