-
Either way, still nice setups guys!
But I gotta agree with One_Hertz here; everything I've seen would suggest way more IOPS with x25-e; Although it will vary with block size and queue depth, the pattern is consistent across different settings.
Here is some single drive IOMETER data on ICH9R (have a look at the links for more, and different block sizes; also you there are other comparable tests on other SSD's there if you dig around)
MOBI 3000

X25-E

x25e on ICH9R
http://forum.ssdworld.ch/viewtopic.php?f=4&t=81
MOBI 3500 on ICH9R
http://forum.ssdworld.ch/viewtopic.php?f=4&t=68
Have a look at the individual IOMeter results for single drive. There is no way that RAID0 can get >100% scaling per additional drive. (So if we compared apples to apples on the same controller, 2*X25-E in RAID0 should have way more IOPS than 8*MOBI 3000 (FYI the newer MOBI 3500 have about 1/2 the IOPS as the MOBI 3000, but slightly higher STR values; those testing results are in another thread if you look)
Last edited by NeedMoMegaHurtZ; 01-28-2009 at 06:51 PM.
Posting Permissions
- You may not post new threads
- You may not post replies
- You may not post attachments
- You may not edit your posts
-
Forum Rules
Bookmarks