Quote Originally Posted by Fragger View Post
No data is "worthless", take from it what you will.
I get the feeling no test could satisfy you.
You need to chill and stop bashing every test, its really not cool.
Au contraire, mon frère

Just look through any of Martin's, mcoffey's, skinnee's, nikhsub1's, or Petra's tests/reviews and I'm sure you'll see me ask a question or two but I don't remember ever questioning the results. Heck, I even had 3 posts in Gabe's "informal review" and they were mostly OT. The only tests I question are the ones with questionable results.

Quote Originally Posted by AndreaBZ View Post
I do not know what to say.... The above is a chart published by "Enzotech"
http://www.enzotechnology.com/luna.htm


Instead this is :
Nexthardware test ....
http://www.nexthardware.com/recensio...a/142_1178.htm
http://www.nexthardware.com/recensio...a/142_1179.htm
http://www.nexthardware.com/recensio...a/142_1180.htm

Confirms the chart published by "Enzotech".
Sorry, vkbms's test, in my eyes, does not confirm Enzo's graphs. He posts delta temps, not actual CPU temps. What exactly is the difference between the Luna and Luna rev. A? Is it something internally?....or is it just the addition of some nozzle inserts? If it's just nozzles, that alone makes the block better in most cases and is hardly note worthy in the way Enzo is presenting that information, more of a P.T. Barnum tactic if you ask me.

It would be nice if vkbms would drop in here and help dispel some of the hype/myths/rumors that apparently surround this block.