Quote Originally Posted by ranker View Post
Because not only did Koolance outright lie about their product's performance, but they also ran tests where not even .000001% of the population can claim to have comparable equipment.

However, doing a review of your past posts, I can tell you're a Koolance fanboy or Koolance shill. Any test that would put Koolance behind any other product would be a faulty test in your eyes.

Read the data. I'm appalled that you can't even interpret the data.
Did they? I'm curious where all those "unbiased real world tests" ended up. Go check the thread. Lot's of cry's of foul and "I'm going to go test this and that and show you what is fact" and guess what, not ONE counter test came back from anyone. What that tells me is that someone probably did run their tests and didn't like that they saw.

Look at it this way. Someone has to stand up for the little guy. Since the real fanbois (such as yourself) are here to flame and slam every chance they get.

As for the test being faulty, I never said it was. I, like others, simply questioned if the very limited set of boundries of the test may have tilted the results in the favor of the tester... and that is very possible. Smart customers/buyers might ask the same questions. But no, you have to come out with the game stopper arguments: shill, fanboi and whatever you think will intimidate and win you the argument by default.

But hey, whatever gives you kicks