MMM
Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 25 of 26

Thread: Phenom II 950 3.1 GHz

  1. #1
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    Nov 2005
    Posts
    1,084
    Quote Originally Posted by Shintai View Post
    And AMD is only a CPU manufactor due to stolen technology and making clones.

  2. #2
    Xtreme Enthusiast
    Join Date
    Sep 2007
    Posts
    746
    I mean, that's great, but do we really need a new product for a 100mhz speed boost? They couldn't have gone to 3.2ghz? Considering the 940 is really a sub-80W part, I imagine 3.2ghz should be possible using the 125W TDP bracket.

  3. #3
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Posts
    299
    100mhz doesn't seem enough to be happy about, was looking for a 200/333mhz boost to cheer about.

  4. #4
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Location
    Karachi, Pakistan
    Posts
    389
    [SIGPIC][/SIGPIC]

  5. #5
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    Feb 2006
    Location
    northern ireland
    Posts
    1,008
    The new 710-720 x3 cores, Are they defective deneb quads or are they actual tri cores, And why 7.5mb cache?

  6. #6
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Location
    Karachi, Pakistan
    Posts
    389
    Quote Originally Posted by gallag View Post
    The new 710-720 x3 cores, Are they defective deneb quads or are they actual tri cores, And why 7.5mb cache?
    7.5MB because they are actually Denebs with one core disabled.
    [SIGPIC][/SIGPIC]

  7. #7
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    Feb 2006
    Location
    northern ireland
    Posts
    1,008
    What does this say about deneb yields? Did it not take over a year to get enough defective agenas to launch x3.

  8. #8
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Location
    London Ontario Canada
    Posts
    1,157
    tri cores = fail
    Case: Corsair 400R
    PSU: Corsair HX1000W
    mobo: Maximus IV Gene
    CPU: 2500K @ 4.2ghz 1.19 volts
    RAM: Gskill Ripjaws 1866mhz 2 x 4 gigs
    OS Drive: Kingston Hyper X ssd 120 gig
    Graphics: XFX HD5850
    Cooling: Corsair H100
    OS: Windows 7 Pro 64 bit







  9. #9
    Xtreme Gamer
    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Location
    Des Moines, IA
    Posts
    879
    Quote Originally Posted by Ozzfest05 View Post
    tri cores = fail
    No it's maximizing profitability, taking full advantage of all your resources.

  10. #10
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Posts
    170
    Quote Originally Posted by Ozzfest05 View Post
    tri cores = fail
    Yeah just throw them to the trush bin.
    Cpu:Phenom ΙΙ 965 c3 @ 4.1Ghz/2.8nb (air cooled)
    Mobo: Asus M3a79-T Deluxe
    Ram:A-data 2x2 800+ @ 1000
    Gpu:Asus Hd4850 512mb @ 700/1050(sycthe Musashi)
    Hdd:500gb Seagate 7200.11
    Psu:Corsair Hx620
    Cooling: TRue(dual fan)
    Case: Coolermaster Haf 932...

  11. #11
    Xtreme Mentor
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Location
    cleveland ohio
    Posts
    2,879
    less wasted silicon more for profit.
    Tri cores get higher IPC since they have more l3 cache to use for all three cores, same with dual core ones with l3 cache.
    HAVE NO FEAR!
    "AMD fallen angel"
    Quote Originally Posted by Gamekiller View Post
    You didn't get the memo? 1 hour 'Fugger time' is equal to 12 hours of regular time.

  12. #12
    I am Xtreme
    Join Date
    Oct 2004
    Location
    U.S.A.
    Posts
    4,743
    Quote Originally Posted by Ozzfest05 View Post
    tri cores = fail
    how dare you talk down about the tri force!


    Asus Z9PE-D8 WS with 64GB of registered ECC ram.|Dell 30" LCD 3008wfp:7970 video card

    LSI series raid controller
    SSDs: Crucial C300 256GB
    Standard drives: Seagate ST32000641AS & WD 1TB black
    OSes: Linux and Windows x64

  13. #13
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Location
    Karachi, Pakistan
    Posts
    389
    Quote Originally Posted by safan80 View Post
    how dare you talk down about the tri force!
    they are actually good processors if priced right they can give wolfdales a run for their money.
    [SIGPIC][/SIGPIC]

  14. #14
    Xtreme Enthusiast
    Join Date
    Aug 2008
    Location
    East Troy Wisconsin
    Posts
    707
    Quote Originally Posted by spicypixel View Post
    100mhz doesn't seem enough to be happy about, was looking for a 200/333mhz boost to cheer about.
    quoted for truth..
    HAF922 (3 fan upgraded) 700w ModXtreme
    MSI GD-65 // HIS 5850 // Saitek Esclipse
    Core i5 750 @ 3.32Ghz (OC Genie) Megahalem w/ 1200rpm Scythe Slipstream
    G. Skill RipJaws DDR3 2000 4x2 gig
    Samsung SpinPoint F3 1TB // 5:1 Dell Surround
    24inch Samsung ToC // MX518

  15. #15
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    Mar 2008
    Posts
    1,163
    Quote Originally Posted by ubuntu83 View Post
    they are actually good processors if priced right they can give wolfdales a run for their money.
    Indeed, they are perfectly OK.

  16. #16
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    Apr 2007
    Posts
    2,476
    I hate when companies tech is lacking that they have to keep increasing clock speed to gain numbers. Its like where AMD was a year or two ago. They should just bust out a 4Ghz chip and save themselves the extra time and silicon wasted.
    i3 2100, MSI H61M-E33. 8GB G.Skill Ripjaws.
    MSI GTX 460 Twin Frozr II. 1TB Caviar Blue.
    Corsair HX 620, CM 690, Win 7 Ultimate 64bit.

  17. #17
    Diablo 3! Who's Excited?
    Join Date
    May 2005
    Location
    Boulder, Colorado
    Posts
    9,412
    There's no way they could launch a 4GHz chip. You play with a Phenom II yet? Most require 1.5vCPU or greater and the TDP shoots through the damn roof. I liken Phenom II to Netburst, it scales well but needs cooling.

  18. #18
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    Oct 2004
    Posts
    1,356
    Why are you guys against tri-cores?

    AMD knows that even against wolfdale clock for clock they can't do much. So they throw you a bone and you get an extra core.

    And with most games only being dual core optimized, that leaves you a free core to deal with the OS/background processes.
    Seems decent enough to me. As long as the price is comparable to wolfdale, I think AMD board owners will enjoy the tri-cores.

  19. #19
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    Nov 2005
    Posts
    1,084
    Can anyone disable 1 core in Ph2 920 and rise HT to 2.2Ghz?

    That should be the tricore.
    Quote Originally Posted by Shintai View Post
    And AMD is only a CPU manufactor due to stolen technology and making clones.

  20. #20
    Xtreme Mentor
    Join Date
    Sep 2006
    Posts
    2,834
    Amazing. Tick, tick, tick, tock.

    For my part I know nothing with any certainty, but the sight of the stars makes me dream.

    ..

  21. #21
    Xtreme Mentor
    Join Date
    Nov 2005
    Location
    Devon
    Posts
    3,437
    Quote Originally Posted by gallag View Post
    What does this say about deneb yields? Did it not take over a year to get enough defective agenas to launch x3.
    I was wondering the same...
    Either they are committing good quad-cores to sell as tri (stupid idea) or yields are worse than on 65nm (most likely). This or other way consumer wins, because tri-cores will be cheaper and less energy hungry. Perfect for HTPC/gaming machines, not so great for workstation/servers.

    On the other thought 1st quarter volume of Agena/Barcelona was definitely MUCH lower than it is on newer 45nm stuff. Looking from this angle is hard to say anything about yield of AMD 45nm process.
    RiG1: Ryzen 7 1700 @4.0GHz 1.39V, Asus X370 Prime, G.Skill RipJaws 2x8GB 3200MHz CL14 Samsung B-die, TuL Vega 56 Stock, Samsung SS805 100GB SLC SDD (OS Drive) + 512GB Evo 850 SSD (2nd OS Drive) + 3TB Seagate + 1TB Seagate, BeQuiet PowerZone 1000W

    RiG2: HTPC AMD A10-7850K APU, 2x8GB Kingstone HyperX 2400C12, AsRock FM2A88M Extreme4+, 128GB SSD + 640GB Samsung 7200, LG Blu-ray Recorder, Thermaltake BACH, Hiper 4M880 880W PSU

    SmartPhone Samsung Galaxy S7 EDGE
    XBONE paired with 55'' Samsung LED 3D TV

  22. #22
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    Mar 2006
    Location
    Saskatchewan, Canada
    Posts
    2,207
    3.1ghz is completely unnecessary? 3.2 or 3.266ghz would be good. Much of the point of the top end processor from both INTEL and AMD is that they have an unlock multiplier, so the actual frequency portion is not as important anymore. That being said, you need a bigger megahertz difference to make that part relevant.

    Tricores are not a bad idea actually. They help AMD diversify the deneb lineup a bit and lets AMD discontinue obsolete processors. AMD needs to discontinue the athlon x2 altogether. Its just a really old architecture at this point and will help AMD image.

  23. #23
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    Nov 2005
    Posts
    1,084
    Quote Originally Posted by Lightman View Post
    On the other thought 1st quarter volume of Agena/Barcelona was definitely MUCH lower than it is on newer 45nm stuff. Looking from this angle is hard to say anything about yield of AMD 45nm process.
    Ph2 core is smaller. yields must be way better otherwise there weren't so much Ph2 in the market.
    And in 1 month 6 new cores come to market in volume. yields can not be a problem with actual roadmap.

    Btw these new tri core are way better. more cache, more clocks, higher ipc, better overclocking. Now these tri-cores can make the hole difference. The Ph1 tri-core was very weak.
    Quote Originally Posted by Shintai View Post
    And AMD is only a CPU manufactor due to stolen technology and making clones.

  24. #24
    Xtremely Kool
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Location
    UK
    Posts
    1,875
    What's with this stock 333 & 266 jumps.. some of you either have never owned AMD CPU or have forgotten.

  25. #25
    I am Xtreme zanzabar's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2007
    Location
    SF bay area, CA
    Posts
    15,871
    i was wanting no clock increase i want an am3 BE as cheap as i can get it at launch of a good amd board
    5930k, R5E, samsung 8GBx4 d-die, vega 56, wd gold 8TB, wd 4TB red, 2TB raid1 wd blue 5400
    samsung 840 evo 500GB, HP EX 1TB NVME , CM690II, swiftech h220, corsair 750hxi

Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast

Bookmarks

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •