heatware chew*
I've got no strings to hold me down.
To make me fret, or make me frown.
I had strings but now I'm free.
There are no strings on me
How long of a wait would I be looking at?
E7200@3.8ghz back alive
DFI LP UT P35
4gig OCZ ddr2800
BFG 9800gtx
Windows 7 beta 1
Tagan 700 watt psu
heatware chew*
I've got no strings to hold me down.
To make me fret, or make me frown.
I had strings but now I'm free.
There are no strings on me
im thinking i may go with that cheap biostar board and get a better board in a month or 2 when they come out. Actually I may even wait after all and get the Q6600 for now. I was all over the phenoms when it was said u can get 4.0ghz on them with air. But now that user reviews are starting to trickle out that on air most possible stable looks like 3.7ghz. I need at least 3.9ghz for bragging rights.
Last edited by carajean; 01-13-2009 at 03:41 AM.
E7200@3.8ghz back alive
DFI LP UT P35
4gig OCZ ddr2800
BFG 9800gtx
Windows 7 beta 1
Tagan 700 watt psu
Current q6600 are struggling for 3.4, might want to go q9450/9550 45nm......for reference a PH II 940 only needs 3.7 to match a q6600 @ 3.6 in most benchmarks. Its a little different with q9550 I think do to the 12mb cache and small ipc improvements. Don't have one to test but i think the gap is a little larger.
heatware chew*
I've got no strings to hold me down.
To make me fret, or make me frown.
I had strings but now I'm free.
There are no strings on me
Bookmarks