Page 13 of 28 FirstFirst ... 31011121314151623 ... LastLast
Results 301 to 325 of 678

Thread: AMD Phenom II Review Thread

  1. #301
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    May 2004
    Posts
    1,755
    Funny that the ones that keep on whining about how disappointed they are or how they were hoping for a better showing from AMD are the same ones that were telling us to not believe the hype, seems like they couldn't take their own advice ing hypocrites
    Crosshair IV Formula
    Phenom II X4 955 @ 3.7G
    6950~>6970 @ 900/1300
    4 x 2G Ballistix 1333 CL6
    C300 64G
    Corsair TX 850W
    CM HAF 932

  2. #302
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    Apr 2008
    Location
    Lansing, MI / London / Stinkaypore
    Posts
    1,788
    Quote Originally Posted by LowRun View Post
    Funny that the ones that keep on whining about how disappointed they are or how they were hoping for a better showing from AMD are the same ones that were telling us to not believe the hype, seems like they couldn't take their own advice ing hypocrites
    QFT, right on.
    Quote Originally Posted by radaja View Post
    so are they launching BD soon or a comic book?

  3. #303
    Xtreme Mentor
    Join Date
    Nov 2006
    Location
    Spain, EU
    Posts
    2,949
    Quote Originally Posted by LowRun View Post
    Funny that the ones that keep on whining about how disappointed they are or how they were hoping for a better showing from AMD are the same ones that were telling us to not believe the hype, seems like they couldn't take their own advice ing hypocrites
    I said here multiple times not to believe the hype and get real. I'm not disappointed at all, this is just as expected. So don't generalize.
    Friends shouldn't let friends use Windows 7 until Microsoft fixes Windows Explorer (link)


    Quote Originally Posted by PerryR, on John Fruehe (JF-AMD) View Post
    Pretty much. Plus, he's here voluntarily.

  4. #304
    I am Xtreme
    Join Date
    Jul 2007
    Location
    Austria
    Posts
    5,485
    Quote Originally Posted by AbelJemka View Post
    I think that GA-EX58-UD3R doesn't support SLI Hornet331 and that GA-EX58-UD4P PCI-E configuration is 16x+16x+8x, and GA-EX58-DS4 is 16X+8x+8x.
    maybe i mixed some things up, but thats not the point. THe point was that P55 boards will easly will be under 150€ even less.

  5. #305
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Posts
    1,192
    Just delete this thread already.

    Its about PII reviews and nothing else.

    FFS.
    Quote Originally Posted by alacheesu View Post
    If you were consistently able to put two pieces of lego together when you were a kid, you should have no trouble replacing the pump top.

  6. #306
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    Apr 2008
    Location
    Birmingham AL.
    Posts
    1,079
    I think PHII is about what all of us expected. Its just that some of us looked forward to PHII's good points and some looked forward to PHII's weak points.
    Particle's First Rule of Online Technical Discussion:
    As a thread about any computer related subject has its length approach infinity, the likelihood and inevitability of a poorly constructed AMD vs. Intel fight also exponentially increases.

    Rule 1A:
    Likewise, the frequency of a car pseudoanalogy to explain a technical concept increases with thread length. This will make many people chuckle, as computer people are rarely knowledgeable about vehicular mechanics.

    Rule 2:
    When confronted with a post that is contrary to what a poster likes, believes, or most often wants to be correct, the poster will pick out only minor details that are largely irrelevant in an attempt to shut out the conflicting idea. The core of the post will be left alone since it isn't easy to contradict what the person is actually saying.

    Rule 2A:
    When a poster cannot properly refute a post they do not like (as described above), the poster will most likely invent fictitious counter-points and/or begin to attack the other's credibility in feeble ways that are dramatic but irrelevant. Do not underestimate this tactic, as in the online world this will sway many observers. Do not forget: Correctness is decided only by what is said last, the most loudly, or with greatest repetition.

    Remember: When debating online, everyone else is ALWAYS wrong if they do not agree with you!

  7. #307
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    Nov 2007
    Location
    Illinois
    Posts
    2,095
    Quote Originally Posted by Shintai View Post
    You could run an i7 with 2 phases if you liked. Got nothing to do with power consumption. More phases=more finetune for overclockers aswell as more stable supply. But also larger inefficiency.

    You would also be amazed I guess on how few phases most server MBs got...

    This one is 6 phases for example:
    http://www.rackmountpro.com/imagevie...LUS.jpg&type=0

    Intels own Smackover X58 board is 6 phases aswell. Asus T6T is 4 phases I think. Asus TEB-D is 5 phases. Flextronics TX65H is 5. MSI MS9199 is 3 or 4.
    I highly doubt you can run an i7 with two phases. Maybe if you do something exotic in the cooling solution. Also, more phases translates to less time each phase is on for.
    E7200 @ 3.4 ; 7870 GHz 2 GB
    Intel's atom is a terrible chip.

  8. #308
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Location
    Lubbock, Texas
    Posts
    2,133
    Quote Originally Posted by G0ldBr1ck View Post
    I think PHII is about what all of us expected. Its just that some of us looked forward to PHII's good points and some looked forward to PHII's weak points.
    lol it seems that way

    im happy with phenom II. i wasn't looking for it to beat intel out at anything and really i wouldn't care if it did anyway, just maybe then the trolls would disappear. performance of phenom I to phenom II is all that mattered to me and phenom II destroyed the original phenom. the new cool and quiet and power consumption are some nice key points. not to mention how well it can overclock. im overclocking until when i don't like the temps anymore, not the max of the chip. with how cool it runs and the heat seems to scale well when it overclocks im really happy with it.

  9. #309
    I am Xtreme
    Join Date
    Jul 2004
    Location
    Little Rock
    Posts
    7,204
    Quote Originally Posted by roofsniper View Post
    lol it seems that way

    im happy with phenom II. i wasn't looking for it to beat intel out at anything and really i wouldn't care if it did anyway, just maybe then the trolls would disappear. performance of phenom I to phenom II is all that mattered to me and phenom II destroyed the original phenom. the new cool and quiet and power consumption are some nice key points. not to mention how well it can overclock. im overclocking until when i don't like the temps anymore, not the max of the chip. with how cool it runs and the heat seems to scale well when it overclocks im really happy with it.
    How can you tell what THE temp is when more than one reviewer said AMD's temp sensor/probe didn't work right?
    Last edited by Donnie27; 01-10-2009 at 11:32 PM. Reason: THE
    Quote Originally Posted by Movieman
    With the two approaches to "how" to design a processor WE are the lucky ones as we get to choose what is important to us as individuals.
    For that we should thank BOTH (AMD and Intel) companies!


    Posted by duploxxx
    I am sure JF is relaxed and smiling these days with there intended launch schedule. SNB Xeon servers on the other hand....
    Posted by gallag
    there yo go bringing intel into a amd thread again lol, if that was someone droping a dig at amd you would be crying like a girl.
    qft!

  10. #310
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Location
    Lubbock, Texas
    Posts
    2,133
    Quote Originally Posted by Donnie27 View Post
    How can you tell what temp it is when more than one reviewer said AMD's temp sensor/probe didn't work right?
    hmmmm what does that have to do with my post? or are we just listing what we don't like about phenom II now?

  11. #311
    Xtreme Enthusiast
    Join Date
    Oct 2006
    Posts
    658
    Quote Originally Posted by roofsniper View Post
    lol it seems that way

    im happy with phenom II. i wasn't looking for it to beat intel out at anything and really i wouldn't care if it did anyway, just maybe then the trolls would disappear. performance of phenom I to phenom II is all that mattered to me and phenom II destroyed the original phenom. the new cool and quiet and power consumption are some nice key points. not to mention how well it can overclock. im overclocking until when i don't like the temps anymore, not the max of the chip. with how cool it runs and the heat seems to scale well when it overclocks im really happy with it.
    It all depends on your expectations of course. I was skeptical at first but was then (stupidly, in hindsight) caught up in all the hype about easy 4GHz+ overclocks on air and Yorkfield levels of IPC, when in reality it requires effort to get high 3GHz overclocks and struggles to match Kentsfield per clock.

    All in all I guess I am slightly disappointed in PII after all the hype, but looking at the bigger picture it really ain't that bad, its a respectable CPU at a good price, and I am glad that AMD users finally have a decent CPU that has good performance, overclocking and power consumption. If nothing else it will bring increased competition to the market and I'm looking forward to Intel cutting Yorkfield prices in response.
    Last edited by Epsilon84; 01-09-2009 at 09:49 PM.

  12. #312
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    Jan 2003
    Location
    Ayia Napa, Cyprus
    Posts
    1,354
    Quote Originally Posted by Donnie27 View Post
    How can you tell what temp it is when more than one reviewer said AMD's temp sensor/probe didn't work right?
    Sorry Donnie, but this post has been reported, you just dont know when to lay off. Give it a break, please
    Seasonic Prime TX-850 Platinum | MSI X570 MEG Unify | Ryzen 5 5800X 2048SUS, TechN AM4 1/2" ID
    32GB Viper Steel 4400, EK Monarch @3733/1866, 1.64v - 13-14-14-14-28-42-224-16-1T-56-0-0
    WD SN850 1TB | Zotac Twin Edge 3070 @2055/1905, Alphacool Eisblock
    2 x Aquacomputer D5 | Eisbecher Helix 250
    EK-CoolStream XE 360 | Thermochill PA120.3 | 6 x Arctic P12

  13. #313
    Xtreme Enthusiast
    Join Date
    Sep 2007
    Posts
    746
    Quote Originally Posted by mongoled View Post
    Sorry Donnie, but this post has been reported, you just dont know when to lay off. Give it a break, please
    honestly , i didn't think id ever defend the guy, but what about his post was offensive? i also read about temp sensor issues, am i to be reported also?

  14. #314
    Moderator
    Join Date
    Mar 2006
    Posts
    8,556
    Quote Originally Posted by mongoled View Post
    Sorry Donnie, but this post has been reported, you just dont know when to lay off. Give it a break, please
    I don't see anything wrong with that post....

  15. #315
    Moderator
    Join Date
    Mar 2006
    Posts
    8,556
    Quote Originally Posted by Shintai View Post
    You could run an i7 with 2 phases if you liked. Got nothing to do with power consumption. More phases=more finetune for overclockers aswell as more stable supply. But also larger inefficiency.

    You would also be amazed I guess on how few phases most server MBs got...

    This one is 6 phases for example:
    http://www.rackmountpro.com/imagevie...LUS.jpg&type=0

    Intels own Smackover X58 board is 6 phases aswell. Asus T6T is 4 phases I think. Asus TEB-D is 5 phases. Flextronics TX65H is 5. MSI MS9199 is 3 or 4.
    Doesn't current SuperMicro boards that support older Clovertons have like 4 phases? And are still rock stable.

  16. #316
    Banned
    Join Date
    Aug 2008
    Posts
    1,052
    Quote Originally Posted by [XC] riptide View Post
    I don't see anything wrong with that post....
    There doesn't need to be anything wrong with the post, that is how biased some people are, hopefully the Mods in this forum won't pander to this sort of irrationality.

  17. #317
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Location
    Lubbock, Texas
    Posts
    2,133
    Quote Originally Posted by Chad Boga View Post
    There doesn't need to be anything wrong with the post, that is how biased some people are, hopefully the Mods in this forum won't pander to this sort of irrationality.
    well some people also don't read the thread name when it says phenom II review thread. not phenom II flame thread.

  18. #318
    Banned
    Join Date
    Aug 2008
    Posts
    1,052
    Quote Originally Posted by roofsniper View Post
    well some people also don't read the thread name when it says phenom II review thread. not phenom II flame thread.
    People are discussing what the reviews show, but once again the fanboys are demanding that ONLY gushing praise of AMD be allowed.

    You have the AMD Sanctuary for that sort of poor carry on.

  19. #319
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    May 2006
    Location
    prospekt Veteranov, Saint-Petersburg, Russia
    Posts
    494
    Last edited by MAS; 01-09-2009 at 11:33 PM.

  20. #320
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    May 2005
    Posts
    1,341
    Quote Originally Posted by Klarko View Post
    Anyone know when new AMD motherboards are coming out? The current ones seem pretty far behind the intel ones...
    pls let us know why you think they are pretty far behind intel boards.

    except for the fact that you have 1001 of the same boards with just another name and they use some fancy colors and cooling rubbish there is nothing more an intel board is able to provide, actually rather the opposite, try to find some intel boards that have such high feature set like 790f - fx and gx for that pricepoint.

    Quote Originally Posted by MAS View Post
    now if they would only add some cpu´s that are actually in the same price range would be added value for the review.......
    Quote Originally Posted by Movieman View Post
    Fanboyitis..
    Comes in two variations and both deadly.
    There's the green strain and the blue strain on CPU.. There's the red strain and the green strain on GPU..

  21. #321
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Location
    Lubbock, Texas
    Posts
    2,133
    Quote Originally Posted by Chad Boga View Post
    People are discussing what the reviews show, but once again the fanboys are demanding that ONLY gushing praise of AMD be allowed.

    You have the AMD Sanctuary for that sort of poor carry on.
    its fine if people discuss it it just seems there are a few people that only have negative things to say, don't really know much about the topic and seem to just flamebait people.

  22. #322
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    May 2006
    Location
    prospekt Veteranov, Saint-Petersburg, Russia
    Posts
    494
    q9300 has the same price

  23. #323
    Banned
    Join Date
    Aug 2008
    Posts
    1,052
    Quote Originally Posted by roofsniper View Post
    its fine if people discuss it it just seems there are a few people that only have negative things to say, don't really know much about the topic and seem to just flamebait people.
    A perverse interpretation of what has happened in this thread, unless you were referring to the posts by Mongoled.

  24. #324
    Banned
    Join Date
    Aug 2008
    Posts
    1,052
    Quote Originally Posted by MAS View Post
    What video card did they use and resolutions did they test the gaming at?

  25. #325
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2008
    Posts
    288
    Quote Originally Posted by MAS View Post
    q9300 has the same price
    q9300 price wise would be a competitor against PII 920 no? The PII 940 is priced to compete with q9400.

    q9300=$245
    http://www.newegg.com/Product/Produc...82E16819115043

    q9400=$270
    http://www.newegg.com/Product/Produc...82E16819115131

    PII 920=$235
    http://www.newegg.com/Product/Produc...82E16819103472

    pII 940=$275
    http://www.newegg.com/Product/Produc...82E16819103471
    Last edited by qurious63ss; 01-10-2009 at 12:00 AM.

Page 13 of 28 FirstFirst ... 31011121314151623 ... LastLast

Bookmarks

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •