Results 1 to 25 of 678

Thread: AMD Phenom II Review Thread

Hybrid View

  1. #1
    Xtreme Cruncher
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Location
    Denmark
    Posts
    7,747
    Quote Originally Posted by ryboto View Post
    Look to Lost-Circuits review, and the table that was already posted in this thread. They do consume around what yorkfields do, but it can also depend on the motherboard.
    In that chart I see a QX9650 use less power than a PH2 940 (Lowest of the 2 PH 940 numbers). All the rest of the yorkfields are missing besides the QX9770. Plus everything is old steppings I bet on the rest. There aint even a Q6600 there.

    So no?

    Its a THG wannabee site it seems.
    Last edited by Shintai; 01-08-2009 at 09:17 AM.
    Crunching for Comrades and the Common good of the People.

  2. #2
    Xtreme Enthusiast
    Join Date
    Sep 2007
    Posts
    746
    Quote Originally Posted by Shintai View Post
    In that chart I see a QX9650 use less power than a PH2 940 (Lowest of the 2 PH 940 numbers). All the rest of the yorkfields are missing besides the QX9770. Plus everything is old steppings I bet on the rest. There aint even a Q6600 there.

    So no?

    Its a THG wannabee site it seems.

    wow, you really pick and choose what you read in people's posts. I said "around".
    at idle:


    and at load:


    Even if it's an old stepping, how much has power consumption improved on those chips? Do you know? 68W vs ~65W, so they are "around" the same, or approximately similar. I remember seeing measurements of a Q6600, putting it at ~70-80W at 2.4ghz.

Bookmarks

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •