I like stuff that gives a glimpse into the near future, allows for better preperationOriginally Posted by largon
But not present. And I like to deal with present. But that's just me.
Btw, what's it like in the future?
As for the future itself.. ITS GREAT! We have flying cars and everything
"Prowler"
X570 Tomahawk | R7 3700X | 2x16GB Klevv BoltX @ 3600MHz CL18 | Powercolor 6800XT Red Devil | Xonar DX 7.1 | 2TB Barracuda | 256GB & 512GB Asgard NVMe drives | 2x DVD & Blu-Ray opticals | EVGA Supernova 1000w G2
Cooling:
6x 140mm LED fans, 1x 200mm LED fan | Modified CoolerMaster Masterliquid 240
Asrock Z77 thread! | Asrock Z77 Extreme6 Review | Asrock P67 Extreme4 Review | Asrock P67 Extreme4/6 Pro3 thread | Asrock Z68 Extreme4 thread | Asrock Z68 Extreme4 Review | Asrock Z68 Gen3 Thread | 8GB G-Skill review | TK 2.ZERO homepage | P5Q series mBIOS thread
Modded X570 Aorus UEFIs
Furmark exists, therefore it's real. Your argument is pathetic, swallow your pride and let it go.2×
What's the relevance of power consumption in some non-real world situation? One cannot draw any perf/watt concusions based on such figures.
They've had them in stock since launch, mine was ordered last week and has been intransit since then.
Thank you for expressing your opinion. But I'm afraid I have to be blunt; I couldn't really care less since you're not making any sense regarding the whole matter.
Last edited by largon; 12-31-2008 at 12:34 AM. Reason: nwm
You were not supposed to see this.
It really doesn't surprise me that you don't understand, that was obvious from your original post.
Dunno about that. Three days ago they weren't in stock because I checked for prices.
Blkout added to mental ignore list.
You were not supposed to see this.
EVGA GTX 260 Core 216 55nm Superclocked Edition Video Card Review
http://www.hardwarecanucks.com/forum...rd-review.html
dissapointing on the overclock reading the review 55nm 65nm no different realy in performance in the review overclocked 3dmark 06 19,000 lol i got 65nm version my 3d marks 20,500
No, there really is no difference but hopefully with the 55nm core, prices may fall on account of supposedly higher yields.
EVGA GTX 260 216 (55 nm) Review (in German)
http://www.hardware-infos.com/tests.php?test=54
the last 260 55nm I got is vantage 3d stable 771/1612/1200 pretty decent me things
EVGA GeForce GTX260 Core 216 Superclocked (55nm GPU) Graphics Accelerator Review
http://xbitlabs.com/articles/video/d...-216-55nm.html
EVGA GeForce GTX260 Core 216 Superclocked (55nm GPU) Review
http://www.pcgameshardware.com/aid,6...200b_reviewed/
Last edited by onethreehill; 01-21-2009 at 05:24 PM.
figured out what was wrong with my setup
looking at the first two of my cards bios the extra voltage was 1.06v which allowed 734/1512/1200 stable, the third cards was at 1.12v and oc'd 771/1612/1200. After flashing the first two to 1.12v extra I have one that oc's to 783/1566/1250 and the other the same as the third card 771/1612/1200
These cards hate above 60c though, will cause a crash if you dont up the fan speed during furmark exactly at 63 each time
Posting Permissions
Bookmarks