Results 1 to 25 of 480

Thread: AMD Phenom II 920 & 940 Full Review

Hybrid View

  1. #1
    Banned
    Join Date
    Oct 2006
    Location
    Haslett, MI
    Posts
    2,221
    I gave a disclaimer a few pages back; what you see is what you get. I'm on water ~ 72F ambients. I'm too lazy to use a multimeter right now, so software would have to do.
    Quote Originally Posted by justapost View Post
    Thanks Zucker2k, but what does the power meter say? Is your system running on air or water cooling?
    I'll post my results as soon as I get an PII.

    EDIT: I see Amps and Watta ge in Everest but it seems everest uses the VID (1.25V) here to calculate the wattage and not the 1.38V really used atm. Beside that 16A look good for the cores but it's quite useless to compare cpu's consumption allone with all the different power sources used nowadays.
    I thought this was a cpu to cpu comparison? I don't have the resources to do a platform comparison. See below.

    System Specs.

    Rampage Formula x48
    Q9550 Quadcore C1 @ 8.5x471
    4x 2GB G.Skill PC2-7200 @ 942mhz 4-4-4-10, 2.19v

    Edit: I don't have a power meter, sorry. This does give a good indication of power consumption by the chip. It is relatively spot on.

    Quote Originally Posted by Morais View Post
    Someone move this thread to AMD section...Admins there wont allow this OT and bull posts
    Yeah let's gag this thread too.

    Quote Originally Posted by Eson View Post
    0.66W at idle... Then why don't NASA use overclocked Core 2 processors in their Mars robot?
    You've been spending too much time on the other side.
    Last edited by Zucker2k; 12-26-2008 at 07:14 AM.

  2. #2
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    Sep 2007
    Location
    Munich, DE
    Posts
    1,401
    Quote Originally Posted by Zucker2k View Post
    I gave a disclaimer a few pages back; what you see is what you get. I'm on water ~ 72F ambients. I'm too lazy to use a multimeter right now, so software would have to do.
    I thought this was a cpu to cpu comparison? I don't have the resources to do a platform comparison. See below.

    System Specs.

    Rampage Formula x48
    Q9550 Quadcore C1 @ 8.5x471
    4x 2GB G.Skill PC2-7200 @ 942mhz 4-4-4-10, 2.19v

    Edit: I don't have a power meter, sorry. This does give a good indication of power consumption by the chip. It is relatively spot on.
    Ok, I will use the IES tool on the AsRock board. It's main usage is to power off unused phases but it's also good to monitor the current amps the cores use (without the NB phase). But it will not say much about the whole systems consumption.

  3. #3
    Xtreme Enthusiast
    Join Date
    Oct 2004
    Location
    Wild West, USA
    Posts
    655
    no phail2 4 me. amd is mainstream now not a leader in performance. i had the power like that 2 years ago. i see not a single reason to switch from core2 to amd right now, it would be just a waste of $

    i7 on the other hand is really powerful architecture. For multimedia pc it would be great, conversion times will improve allot from core2,

    my only hope that with the great clock phail2 seams to get on LN2 it could compete on the ORB.
    Abit IC7 P4 2.8a @4.21 | P4 3.4e @4.9 | Gainward 6800GT GS @486/1386
    Asus P4P800 SE Dothan 730-PM @ 2900 | EVGA 6800 Ultra GS @521/1376

    e8400@4.3G & 8800GTS G92 800/1932/1132 as gaming rig 24/7

    Custom self build chillbox with watercooling @-28c 24/7 | chilled wc " cpu -18c idle/-3c load
    3DMark 2005 Score Dothan & 6800U
    3DMark 2005 Score p4 & 6800GT

Bookmarks

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •