AMD Phenom II 920 & 940 Full Review

[D-Cyph3r]

That sums up what we have been hearing for weeks , PII still slower clock per clock even when compared to two years old kentsfield

Why are so many of you saying this? Am I looking at a different set of graphs or something?

From what I saw it was quite comfortably duking it out with the Q9550 90% of the time, it was only the tests that have always favored Intel that it was at the same level as the Q6600....


Jesus christ even now some of you seem to be trying to highlight the few bad points over the masses of good ones.

[gallag]

Why are so many of you saying this? Am I looking at a different set of graphs or something?

From what I saw it was quite comfortably duking it out with the Q9550 90% of the time, it was only the tests that have always favored Intel that it was at the same level as the Q6600....


Jesus christ even now some of you seem to be trying to highlight the few bad points over the masses of good ones.

I think people mean clock for clock, Dont forget that the q6600 is 2.4ghz, If they clocked it up to 2.8-3.0ghz ph2 would be having a hard time with it, Even if you clock them both to the max I doubt that ph2 would be much better. Thats why I am disappointed, Ph2 looks to be 2 years late.