Phenom X4 II 940 in my hand ...

[demonkevy666]

internal cache is ddr-3 on phenoms. just doesnt have ddr-3 memory controller activated. its allways been there. notice it says "internal"



http://www.xtremesystems.org/forums/...d.php?t=211848

thre is some PH-II benchmarks i posted earlier from [H] forum

the op there is has been waiting 3 days for activation on this forum. they said they have not recieved the activation email.
if a mod sees this please pm table21 or send there activation email. TY

that make it sounds like the L3 cache, but l3 cache is much fast the ddr3 main memory and 2600mhz ddr3 would be a record.

anyways Mine says. internal ddr2 ddr3 memory controller

[Calmatory]

Internal cache obviously can't have anything to do with DDR3 or any DRAM either, since the internal CPU cache is SRAM, which is more expensive but a lot faster than same amount of DRAM would be. SRAM latencies are around one fifth of those of DRAM(though this depends on a lot of factors, first being clock frequency). So, quite a bit faster actually.

[Miss Banana]

This thread is a load of crap.
What is the difference anyways, between PMing everyone the results or putting the results in this thread?
Someone wants attention.

[Titan7171]

[Smalltimer]

This thread is a load of crap.
What is the difference anyways, between PMing everyone the results or putting the results in this thread?
Someone wants attention.

Seems to be the trend lately.

[KELL5]

This thread is a load of crap.
What is the difference anyways, between PMing everyone the results or putting the results in this thread?
Someone wants attention.

I agree, if he's PM'd one person with a result it's the same as breaking NDA by telling hundreds.

30ppl in a thread ask for results......30 ppl get PM's....30 ppl know the result.

If you come to this thread and DON'T ask for a PM then you don't get to know the results so no NDA is breached. It was just breached 30times by PM'ing results to 30 ppl, lol

Makes total sense.

Still, I look forward to seeing any public results when they come.

[LowRun]

This thread is a load of crap.
What is the difference anyways, between PMing everyone the results or putting the results in this thread?
Someone wants attention.

Agreed, no surprise tho' as the guy has been doing this countless times, what's surprising is that some people still expect him to come out with something interesting. Even if he posted something i would not consider his results, he couldn't get more than 3 GHz out of his retail Intel CPUs so he labeled them bad overclockers just because he couldn't even figure he was using faulty ram sticks

[azraeel101]

Agreed, no surprise tho' as the guy has been doing this countless times, what's surprising is that some people still expect him to come out with something interesting.

Yeah, remember OBR's HD4850 fiasco? He got everybody excited saying he got one before launch, he said he'll make a review, then he didn't post any result.. It all turned into a soap opera lol. Funny how anybody trusts him anymore...

[roofsniper]

if all you guys don't like him then why did you bother posting in this thread?

[Rammsteiner]

I assume we all went em0 this month

[LowRun]

if all you guys don't like him then why did you bother posting in this thread?

Yeah, why wouldn't we let the guy screw us like he always did one more time and shut the up about it

[Brother Esau]

This thread is a load of crap.
What is the difference anyways, between PMing everyone the results or putting the results in this thread?
Someone wants attention.

We have Bingo OBR is attention seeker

[KELL5]

then this thread should be closed.

[trueblue]

I ... you can post wishes for benchmarks ...

My usual bench setup software:



If you have special request, post here ....

Could you update this chart and add two columns. Next to the Phenom 2600 results add a column with the Phenom I normalized to 3 GHz, and the second column a Phenom II at 3 GHz (I realize it will be empty until the NDA expires). This will give a good comparison of the performance increase in the new cpu's.

I think this chart is very interesting from two standpoints. You can see a consistent pattern. For applications in which the Phenom performs poorly with respect to the QX9650 quad or the core i7 920, the increase in performance seems to be more of a function of the large cache available. For other applications, the Phenom 2600 either wins or is very close, despite being at a lower speed. I think we will see a rapid convergence of scores when the larger cache Phenom II's become available. I am beginning to think that most of the original Phenom's problems have been that it has too small an L3 cache for four cores and poor cache latency.

Of course I could be wrong...it seems to happen a lot

[Oliverda]

[azraeel101]

Nice one my hungarian neighbour

I think either OBR posts some results or a mod locks this thread.