Results 1 to 25 of 1265

Thread: AMD Shanghai/Deneb Review Thread

Threaded View

  1. #30
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    Apr 2007
    Posts
    2,128
    Quote Originally Posted by Throwed View Post
    Record? You're a funny guy. First of all, that screen shot means a hill of beans TBH. I and a few others here don't really trust things like that. Though most of us do trust the words of people like "Team Finland"(Sampsa and crew) and they reached 6.3Ghz so your point is moot! IIRC they even ran the Crysis demo at 6Ghz on a Deneb. Not sure if Intel has accomplished this milestone, but since you seem to favor Intel why don't you link us to something similar. Better yet, DON'T because this thread is NOT about Intel. Go start your own rant in the Intel section. FYI, the videos from the Chicago, Boston, and etc. AREN'T fake.


    I'll never understand why people that favor Intel come to a thread in the AMD section to voice their opinions that NO ONE wants to hear. Talking loud and saying nothing sums their actions up.
    Who the *** has been talking about the LN2 runs in the events except you? Why are you trying to put words into my mouth?

    One valuable tip: Learn to read.

    Look at this: http://bbs.chiphell.com/attachments/...4B0vamd7VO.jpg

    Then look at this: http://www.xtremesystems.org/forums/...&postcount=612

    Now, read this:
    Quote Originally Posted by Calmatory View Post
    No.

    CPU-Z validator which generates the static image has only rated FSB, however the actual CPU-Z client has HT Link for AMD AM2 processors. That Chiphell screenshot shows the CPU-Z client, which shows Rated FSB instead of HT Link - what it should show.

    That could mean that the pic was taken with Intel CPU and then just shopped it as a Deneb CPU-Z screenie. Most certainly a fake, considering that vCore is lower than 1.9 V
    and Sampsa & others claim/were told that 1.95 V is needed for 6 GHz.

    All I've been saying is that the Chiphell pic is FAKE and AMD has not beaten Intel QuadCore MHz record. I think that it really hurts your feelings? Besides, even if PhII beats the MHz, the actual IPC advantage still makes Intel clear winner. Sad but true.

    Ok, if you consider me Intel fanboy as I bust your dreams and beliefs and am running Intel platform then fine, but don't be disappointed when you wake to the reality and see Intel spanking AMD once again. Phenom II is no godsend.
    Last edited by Calmatory; 12-19-2008 at 11:03 AM.

Bookmarks

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •