My first thought...
Tested from OCZ
or
WE test it for OCZ?
My first thought...
Tested from OCZ
or
WE test it for OCZ?
did you read what i posted?Originally Posted by SetteUltras
Got a problem with your OCZ product....?
Have a look over here
Tony AKA BigToe
Tuning PC's for speed...Run whats fast, not what you think is fast
I read what you posted.
Will the potential buyers have the chance to read what you posted on the box they ll purchase?
I'm afraid they will not.
Nothing personal m8. Just commenting a product from OCZ as it appears in the title of this thread. Same goes for all other companies selling products not fully functioning out of the box. And anyone expect that an ssd buyer should be familiar with terms like ramdrive,steadystate (lol!), cache etc.
Cheers m8.
Good point, but you're shooting at the messenger. It's hardly Tony's job to make this message appear on the box. It is his job though to test and tweak OCZ products, and he's reporting his findings. he doesn't have to do it, he does it to help people out, has been for years now as a matter of fact.
It is Tony (among others) who has helped clear out the mess after the Anand article, since when it has seemed that OCZ was the only SSD company with "controller" problems, while any other company with MLC drives (except Intel maybe, and even that's fishy) is in the same boat. He has been spending countless hours clearing the issues out and finding a way out, and steadystate is among them. Not saying the products couldn't be better, but the heart of the problem lies in the OS'es that are not tuned for discs this fast, the product just magnifies the OS shortcomings. I'd say be grateful and don't shoot at this messenger, he really does not deserve it.
"The light at the end of the tunnel is the headlight of an oncoming train" (Murphy)
Reviewing for Madshrimps
Good on you guys at OCZ. This is first class. Seeing something guys here have been asking for, and then posting directly about it. That rocks!
Posting Permissions
Reply With Quote
Bookmarks