Fudzilla again...
http://www.fudzilla.com/index.php?op...10962&Itemid=1
Fudzilla again...
http://www.fudzilla.com/index.php?op...10962&Itemid=1
pretty nice temps on the zalman considering the OC.
Particle's First Rule of Online Technical Discussion:
As a thread about any computer related subject has its length approach infinity, the likelihood and inevitability of a poorly constructed AMD vs. Intel fight also exponentially increases.
Rule 1A:
Likewise, the frequency of a car pseudoanalogy to explain a technical concept increases with thread length. This will make many people chuckle, as computer people are rarely knowledgeable about vehicular mechanics.
Rule 2:
When confronted with a post that is contrary to what a poster likes, believes, or most often wants to be correct, the poster will pick out only minor details that are largely irrelevant in an attempt to shut out the conflicting idea. The core of the post will be left alone since it isn't easy to contradict what the person is actually saying.
Rule 2A:
When a poster cannot properly refute a post they do not like (as described above), the poster will most likely invent fictitious counter-points and/or begin to attack the other's credibility in feeble ways that are dramatic but irrelevant. Do not underestimate this tactic, as in the online world this will sway many observers. Do not forget: Correctness is decided only by what is said last, the most loudly, or with greatest repetition.
Remember: When debating online, everyone else is ALWAYS wrong if they do not agree with you!
That is true.
It's looking good.
i won't point out the obvious information gaps.
love you, faud!
Please don't......I like my info gappy!Originally Posted by Slovnaft
FYI, links to Fud is unacceptable here at XS.
Next time I will citizen arrest you for this.
I hope they are, cause with that numbers PII is barely faster then PI clock for clock.
NB is ran at 1.6, which means the board isn't really identifying it properly.
I remember that Phenom Is had NB running at 1.6 if the board was AM2 (not AM2+)...
seriously can you please make an argument you have 102 posts yet none of your posts have been readable or even provide any information. i wouldn't care as much if you actually provided an argument that made sense instead everything you say just bashes them today i believe i have read 5 of your posts and all of them are stuff like fake or its not possible. can you go back to the intel section and stop being a troll?
+1, thankyou!
C3 Phenom II 965 BE (0941CPMW)
Msi 790Fx-GD 70
2x2 gb OCZ AMD Black Edition 1600mhz DDR 3
2x MSI HD 5850's OC edition X-fire
2x Western Digital 250gb 16mb cache Raid-0
1x Seagate 1 TB Data
SILVERSTONE|DA700 700W RT Power Supply
Koolance INX-720 (Koolance 345 block)
LianLi pc-60fwb
+ 2
I wouldnt mind it if it was true... ^^
+3 to that.
" Business is Binary, your either a 1 or a 0, alive or dead." - Gary Winston ^^
Asus rampage III formula,i7 980xm, H70, Silverstone Ft02, Gigabyte Windforce 580 GTX SLI, Corsair AX1200, intel x-25m 160gb, 2 x OCZ vertex 2 180gb, hp zr30w, 12gb corsair vengeance
Rig 2
i7 980x ,h70, Antec Lanboy Air, Samsung md230x3 ,Saphhire 6970 Xfired, Antec ax1200w, x-25m 160gb, 2 x OCZ vertex 2 180gb,12gb Corsair Vengence MSI Big Bang Xpower
+4 as well.
ASUS Sabretooth P67.B3
Core i5 2500K 4900MHz stable/4500 Daily use
Fractal Design R3 with Corsair TX 650W PSU
G.Skill ARES LP 1600 @ 1866
MSI Radeon 7950 @ 1150/1600
OCZ Vertex 4 128GB FW 1.5
+5 and 6
As a thread about any computer related subject has its length approach infinity, the likelihood and inevitability of a poorly constructed AMD vs. Intel fight also exponentially increases.
Likewise, the frequency of a car pseudoanalogy to explain a technical concept increases with thread length. This will make many people chuckle, as computer people are rarely knowledgeable about vehicular mechanics.
When confronted with a post that is contrary to what a poster likes, believes, or most often wants to be correct, the poster will pick out only minor details that are largely irrelevant in an attempt to shut out the conflicting idea. The core of the post will be left alone since it isn't easy to contradict what the person is actually saying.
When a poster cannot properly refute a post they do not like (as described above), the poster will most likely invent fictitious counter-points and/or begin to attack the other's credibility in feeble ways that are dramatic but irrelevant. Do not underestimate this tactic, as in the online world this will sway many observers. Do not forget: Correctness is decided only by what is said last, the most loudly, or with greatest repetition.
Remember: When debating online, everyone else is ALWAYS wrong if they do not agree with you!
Posting Permissions
Reply With Quote
Bookmarks