it is looping now, after a ati stream expert session
it is looping now, after a ati stream expert session
Originally Posted by clonez
wow, this looks great
more game benchies @ 3.5-4 ghz, pleeeease
looks like amd will get some of my money in january...
edit: does anybody know more about idle power consumption (and is able to tell)? those temps make me hope....
3.64GHz, 22C Idle, it was cold today though, limit was 3.8 but that was at the same max HT as a 4200+ so probably the board not the CPU, CPU-z is misreading it as a 940, actually was a 920. Still waiting for a 940 and it's unlocked multiplier.
Last edited by initialised; 12-10-2008 at 11:45 AM.
Intel i7 920 C0 @ 3.67GHz
ASUS 6T Deluxe
Powercolor 7970 @ 1050/1475
12GB GSkill Ripjaws
Antec 850W TruePower Quattro
50" Full HD PDP
Red Cosmos 1000
Nice to see the 920 clocking just as well.......thanks for the info
Particle's First Rule of Online Technical Discussion:
As a thread about any computer related subject has its length approach infinity, the likelihood and inevitability of a poorly constructed AMD vs. Intel fight also exponentially increases.
Rule 1A:
Likewise, the frequency of a car pseudoanalogy to explain a technical concept increases with thread length. This will make many people chuckle, as computer people are rarely knowledgeable about vehicular mechanics.
Rule 2:
When confronted with a post that is contrary to what a poster likes, believes, or most often wants to be correct, the poster will pick out only minor details that are largely irrelevant in an attempt to shut out the conflicting idea. The core of the post will be left alone since it isn't easy to contradict what the person is actually saying.
Rule 2A:
When a poster cannot properly refute a post they do not like (as described above), the poster will most likely invent fictitious counter-points and/or begin to attack the other's credibility in feeble ways that are dramatic but irrelevant. Do not underestimate this tactic, as in the online world this will sway many observers. Do not forget: Correctness is decided only by what is said last, the most loudly, or with greatest repetition.
Remember: When debating online, everyone else is ALWAYS wrong if they do not agree with you!
Google shopping came up with this, I couldn't get to the actual product page, price is equivalent to i7 920.
Link to vendor: http://www.google.co.uk/product_url?...hl=en&sa=title
Last edited by initialised; 12-10-2008 at 12:32 PM.
Intel i7 920 C0 @ 3.67GHz
ASUS 6T Deluxe
Powercolor 7970 @ 1050/1475
12GB GSkill Ripjaws
Antec 850W TruePower Quattro
50" Full HD PDP
Red Cosmos 1000
[QUOTE
4 cores ... yey[/QUOTE]
I've looked at the video some times now especially the benching part.
The voltage set for 6,3Ghz is from what i've seen is 1,963 Volt.
When the guy sets 6,0Ghz you see shortly that he moves the mouse to core 0 and that he sets the multiplyer. the box where you can set -copy to all cores- is off. So in my view they only aply it to one core. For the move to 6,1Ghz he uses core 1 to get the clock.
All i what to say is get me some decent air benches
But nomather what i'll be getting a 940
Spider >>>> Dragon system:
Antec P182
Antec TruePower Quattro, 850Watt
ASUS CROSSHAIR III
Corsair H50 PnP
AMD 955BE
Corsair CMD8GX3M4A1600C8 4x2GB
WD Raptor, 3x36 GB RAID 0
Sapphire HD4890 CF
Vista Home Premium 64bit, NL
Logitech G15.2 & G9
The whole world just wants 1M Super Pi at around 3.5 or 3.8Ghz. Whoever posted that screen (@ initialised). Can you post a 1M Super pI, you have it on the desktop ! Thanks.
i9 9900K/1080 Ti
Now we talkingThe whole world just wants 1M Super Pi at around 3.5 or 3.8Ghz. Whoever posted that screen (@ initialised). Can you post a 1M Super pI, you have it on the desktop ! Thanks.
I believe it's in the pics folder, I'll have to check the NDA first.The whole world just wants 1M Super Pi at around 3.5 or 3.8Ghz. Whoever posted that screen, Can you post a 1M Super pI, you have it on the desktop ! Thanks.
Intel i7 920 C0 @ 3.67GHz
ASUS 6T Deluxe
Powercolor 7970 @ 1050/1475
12GB GSkill Ripjaws
Antec 850W TruePower Quattro
50" Full HD PDP
Red Cosmos 1000
Cpu-z spefication in the picture says it's 920
Is this true?
Dont know, my AOD had this aweomse feature not to show when I selected a box or not. So it was a last minute show whether all cores were set or not
Then again, BIOS is the way to go anyway
Synaptic Overflow
CPU:
-Intel Core i7 920 3841A522
--CPU: 4200Mhz| Vcore: +120mV| Uncore: 3200Mhz| VTT: +100mV| Turbo: On| HT: Off
---CPU block: EK Supreme Acetal| Radiator: TCF X-Changer 480mm
Motherboard:
-Foxconn Bloodrage P06
--Blck: 200Mhz| QPI: 3600Mhz
Graphics:
-Sapphire Radeon HD 4870X2
--GPU: 750Mhz| GDDR: 900Mhz
RAM:
-3x 2GB Mushkin XP3-12800
--Mhz: 800Mhz| Vdimm: 1.65V| Timings: 7-8-7-20-1T
Storage:
-3Ware 9650SE-2LP RAID controller
--2x Western Digital 74GB Raptor RAID 0
PSU:
-Enermax Revolution 85+ 1250W
OS:
-Windows Vista Business x64
ORDERED: Sapphire HD 5970 OC
LOOKING FOR: 2x G.Skill Falcon II 128GB SSD, Windows 7
[QUOTE=Koekerwauz_NL;3489963]I've looked at the video some times now especially the benching part.
The voltage set for 6,3Ghz is from what i've seen is 1,963 Volt.
When the guy sets 6,0Ghz you see shortly that he moves the mouse to core 0 and that he sets the multiplyer. the box where you can set -copy to all cores- is off. So in my view they only aply it to one core. For the move to 6,1Ghz he uses core 1 to get the clock.
All i what to say is get me some decent air benches
But nomather what i'll be getting a 940
Holy suicidal destruct-o-core!2v?!?? Why not just stick a molex connector in the back of the CPU socket? That's rediculous.
[QUOTE=T_Flight;3490140]We have been hearing about 1.9v OC's for a week now. the 3.9 on air was at 1.54 and somone that was there said the AMD guy stated that was well within Denebs safe limit. With that the 1.9 doesnt sound that rediculous.
Holy suicidal destruct-o-core!
Edit: Whats the deal with the quote buton all the sudden? broken?
Last edited by G0ldBr1ck; 12-10-2008 at 02:09 PM.
As a thread about any computer related subject has its length approach infinity, the likelihood and inevitability of a poorly constructed AMD vs. Intel fight also exponentially increases.
Likewise, the frequency of a car pseudoanalogy to explain a technical concept increases with thread length. This will make many people chuckle, as computer people are rarely knowledgeable about vehicular mechanics.
When confronted with a post that is contrary to what a poster likes, believes, or most often wants to be correct, the poster will pick out only minor details that are largely irrelevant in an attempt to shut out the conflicting idea. The core of the post will be left alone since it isn't easy to contradict what the person is actually saying.
When a poster cannot properly refute a post they do not like (as described above), the poster will most likely invent fictitious counter-points and/or begin to attack the other's credibility in feeble ways that are dramatic but irrelevant. Do not underestimate this tactic, as in the online world this will sway many observers. Do not forget: Correctness is decided only by what is said last, the most loudly, or with greatest repetition.
Remember: When debating online, everyone else is ALWAYS wrong if they do not agree with you!
check the video and see for your self.
rechecked it myself it appears to be 2 cores are set
Last edited by Koekerwauz_NL; 12-10-2008 at 02:45 PM.
Spider >>>> Dragon system:
Antec P182
Antec TruePower Quattro, 850Watt
ASUS CROSSHAIR III
Corsair H50 PnP
AMD 955BE
Corsair CMD8GX3M4A1600C8 4x2GB
WD Raptor, 3x36 GB RAID 0
Sapphire HD4890 CF
Vista Home Premium 64bit, NL
Logitech G15.2 & G9
well yes he used core 0 for 6GHz and core 1 for the next step: 6,1GHz, would that mean 2 out of 4 cores where at +6Ghz?
And y did CPU-Z show the 6100Mhz after he set the core-1 multi to 6,1 GHz without changing the Core in cpu-z? or did he?
It always shows Core#0 at CPU-Z. so if he only changed Core-Multi-1 y should CPU-Z show Core#0 at 6,1GHz and not still 6,0GHz
I hope u get what i mean .. kinda hard to explain for me sry..
so maybe this was for all 4 cores? AOD bug?
Whats up with that core 3 voltage, 0.9V? 0.8V?
Ah, 800Mhz.
So can these Phenom II clock their cores independently or not?
This could be a very good thing, we could have 2 higher-clocked cores for "hard work" and 2 lower-clocked cores for backup. This way we could allow higher clocks\less heat\less consumption for the CPU and have a boost on single\dual-threaded applications.
Better that this is only having Cool'n'Quiet working independently for each core.
I would say thats a yes, The 65nm phenoms clock independently by multi's.
As a thread about any computer related subject has its length approach infinity, the likelihood and inevitability of a poorly constructed AMD vs. Intel fight also exponentially increases.
Likewise, the frequency of a car pseudoanalogy to explain a technical concept increases with thread length. This will make many people chuckle, as computer people are rarely knowledgeable about vehicular mechanics.
When confronted with a post that is contrary to what a poster likes, believes, or most often wants to be correct, the poster will pick out only minor details that are largely irrelevant in an attempt to shut out the conflicting idea. The core of the post will be left alone since it isn't easy to contradict what the person is actually saying.
When a poster cannot properly refute a post they do not like (as described above), the poster will most likely invent fictitious counter-points and/or begin to attack the other's credibility in feeble ways that are dramatic but irrelevant. Do not underestimate this tactic, as in the online world this will sway many observers. Do not forget: Correctness is decided only by what is said last, the most loudly, or with greatest repetition.
Remember: When debating online, everyone else is ALWAYS wrong if they do not agree with you!
Get's out the damned scratchy wool mod Hat
Gentlemen;
Can we keep this friendly please and just enjoy AMD's new powerhouse whether it's 1,2 or 4 cores?
Let us all enjoy their accomplishment and learn about it as friends ok?
Yea, I know, that sounds corny as all hell but it's the truth.
Let's have some fun together and see what this beast has inside it.
Thanks for reading.
Crunch with us, the XS WCG team
The XS WCG team needs your support.
A good project with good goals.
Come join us,get that warm fuzzy feeling that you've done something good for mankind.
Sounds reasonable enough...this has been an exciting year with tech so far...next year might be just as fun...reasons why compition is good...
~1~
AMD Ryzen 9 3900X
GigaByte X570 AORUS LITE
Trident-Z 3200 CL14 16GB
AMD Radeon VII
~2~
AMD Ryzen ThreadRipper 2950x
Asus Prime X399-A
GSkill Flare-X 3200mhz, CAS14, 64GB
AMD RX 5700 XT
Thank You Movieman! BTW, Enjoy the Boston show.
Phenom 9950BE (125w) 3.2 ghz| ASUS M3A79-T Deluxe | 4 Gig Corsair XMS2 (DDR2 800 Mhz) | NV 8800 GTS 512 (G92) | SATA2: 2-SGTE 350; 2-WD 250 | SeaSonic M12 SS-700HM| Apogee GTZ; MCP355; Feser 240 | Creative X-Fi Xtremegamer | VISTA 32-bit |
Way to go, please keep up the great workI've been following the thread and have gotten quite a bit out of it.
Posted by duploxxx
I am sure JF is relaxed and smiling these days with there intended launch schedule. SNB Xeon servers on the other hand....
Posted by gallag
there yo go bringing intel into a amd thread again lol, if that was someone droping a dig at amd you would be crying like a girl.
I'm looking forward to this launch, hopefully AMD can get some good stuff out and I can build another rig.
Core i7 920 / P6T Deluxe/ 3x2GB DDR3-1600 /EVGA GTX 280 SLi/ Prelude /Cooler Master RC690 + UCP 1.1kw/ G15 v2, G5 v2 / HP LP3065 + Sony FW900
the settings were applied to all CPU cores (note the "Copy to all CPUs" part that is selected). the tool is modifying the P-state 0&1 parameters (= CPU Multiplier (FID), CPU Voltage (VID) etc).
the old-school guy (= Pete) preferred the classic P-state tool while Team Finland (Sampsa&SF3D) used AMD OverDrive for Overclocking.
Thank you for the info macci.
Is this tool available for public use? Can it make use of the other three p-state registers?
Posting Permissions
Reply With Quote
Bookmarks