Page 5 of 9 FirstFirst ... 2345678 ... LastLast
Results 101 to 125 of 210

Thread: Intel Core i5 Performance

  1. #101
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Nov 2006
    Posts
    64
    time to save $$$ for a new system : p

  2. #102
    Xtreme Cruncher
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Location
    Denmark
    Posts
    7,747
    Quote Originally Posted by Spacemaster View Post
    Question is what about multiplier, can we expect higher multiplier than i7, or same like i7 for the start? 16 is ok, but 20, 22, 24 is more interesting for overclock.
    Same 133 BCLK. So same multipliers. Thats actually something that is history I think. Lowend OCs via high multi.
    Crunching for Comrades and the Common good of the People.

  3. #103
    Xtreme Enthusiast
    Join Date
    Apr 2008
    Posts
    912
    Quote Originally Posted by George_o/c View Post
    What's happening here ? Maybe these people aren't satisfied with the progress Intel made ? I mean it's clearly not the progress we noticed from Pentium D to Conroe, or Kentsfield to Yorkfield ...
    That's because Pentium D was such utter to begin with that it seemed like such a huge jump. This thing actually provides the same performance jump in many benchmarks, but obviously not all of them..

  4. #104
    Xtreme Enthusiast
    Join Date
    May 2006
    Location
    Serbia-Belgrade
    Posts
    585
    Quote Originally Posted by Shintai View Post
    Same 133 BCLK. So same multipliers. Thats actually something that is history I think. Lowend OCs via high multi.
    I knew it is same the BCKL, but this is mainstream CPU, mainstream CPUs always have lower multi then high end CPUs. This ES have default 16 multi. So if new the i5 CPUs will have 20, 22, 24 and higher multi, that will be excellently for the overclock.
    Last edited by Spacemaster; 12-10-2008 at 06:36 AM.

  5. #105
    Xtreme Cruncher
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Location
    Denmark
    Posts
    7,747
    Quote Originally Posted by Spacemaster View Post
    I knew it is same the BCKL, but this is mainstream CPU, mainstream CPUs always have lower multi then high end CPUs. This ES have default 16 multi.
    Only in the past. And you had that due to different FSB speeds (800, 1066, 1333, 1600). Now its all the same BCLK. No 80Mhz BLCK, 106Mhz BLCK, 133BLCK, 160Mhz BLCK etc.

    Only 133.

    So no. Its all a multi x of the BCLK.
    Crunching for Comrades and the Common good of the People.

  6. #106
    Xtreme Enthusiast
    Join Date
    May 2006
    Location
    Serbia-Belgrade
    Posts
    585
    Quote Originally Posted by Shintai View Post
    Same 133 BCLK. So same multipliers. Thats actually something that is history I think. Lowend OCs via high multi.
    Quote Originally Posted by Shintai View Post
    Only in the past. And you had that due to different FSB speeds (800, 1066, 1333, 1600). Now its all the same BCLK. No 80Mhz BLCK, 106Mhz BLCK, 133BLCK, 160Mhz BLCK etc.

    Only 133.

    So no. Its all a multi x of the BCLK.
    Ok, do you have any information that you can share about names of i5 models, and default clock frequency (multipliers)?

  7. #107
    Xtreme Cruncher
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Location
    Denmark
    Posts
    7,747
    Quote Originally Posted by Spacemaster View Post
    Ok, do you have any information that you can share about names of i5 models, and default clock frequency (multipliers)?
    Not really no.

    I expect i5 to peak at 2.80Ghz or so. Maybe 2.93Ghz if lucky. And then else down in 133Mhz increments. Maybe as low as 2.00 or 2.13Ghz.
    Crunching for Comrades and the Common good of the People.

  8. #108
    Xtreme Enthusiast
    Join Date
    May 2006
    Location
    Serbia-Belgrade
    Posts
    585
    Quote Originally Posted by Shintai View Post
    Not really no.

    I expect i5 to peak at 2.80Ghz or so. Maybe 2.93Ghz if lucky.
    You think that clock can be default clock?

  9. #109
    Xtreme Cruncher
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Location
    Denmark
    Posts
    7,747
    Quote Originally Posted by Spacemaster View Post
    You think that clock can be default clock?
    Yes ofcourse. The roadmap also shows i5 rival lowend i7. Because their segments are different.
    Crunching for Comrades and the Common good of the People.

  10. #110
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    Sep 2008
    Posts
    228
    Could anyone confirm Lynnfield and Havendale are LGA1156 or 1160?

  11. #111
    I am Xtreme
    Join Date
    Jul 2004
    Location
    Little Rock
    Posts
    7,204
    Quote Originally Posted by Vozer View Post
    Could anyone confirm Lynnfield and Havendale are LGA1156 or 1160?
    1160
    Quote Originally Posted by Movieman
    With the two approaches to "how" to design a processor WE are the lucky ones as we get to choose what is important to us as individuals.
    For that we should thank BOTH (AMD and Intel) companies!


    Posted by duploxxx
    I am sure JF is relaxed and smiling these days with there intended launch schedule. SNB Xeon servers on the other hand....
    Posted by gallag
    there yo go bringing intel into a amd thread again lol, if that was someone droping a dig at amd you would be crying like a girl.
    qft!

  12. #112
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    Sep 2008
    Posts
    228
    Quote Originally Posted by Donnie27 View Post
    1160
    Thank you.

    I'm too lazy to count the number of pins on Lynnfield CPU in this picture.


  13. #113
    Xtreme Mentor
    Join Date
    Nov 2006
    Location
    Spain, EU
    Posts
    2,949
    Lynnfield is 1156 actually.
    Friends shouldn't let friends use Windows 7 until Microsoft fixes Windows Explorer (link)


    Quote Originally Posted by PerryR, on John Fruehe (JF-AMD) View Post
    Pretty much. Plus, he's here voluntarily.

  14. #114
    I am Xtreme
    Join Date
    Jul 2004
    Location
    Little Rock
    Posts
    7,204
    Quote Originally Posted by STaRGaZeR View Post
    Lynnfield is 1156 actually.
    Why do they keep calling it 1160, rounded?
    Quote Originally Posted by Movieman
    With the two approaches to "how" to design a processor WE are the lucky ones as we get to choose what is important to us as individuals.
    For that we should thank BOTH (AMD and Intel) companies!


    Posted by duploxxx
    I am sure JF is relaxed and smiling these days with there intended launch schedule. SNB Xeon servers on the other hand....
    Posted by gallag
    there yo go bringing intel into a amd thread again lol, if that was someone droping a dig at amd you would be crying like a girl.
    qft!

  15. #115
    Xtreme Mentor
    Join Date
    Nov 2006
    Location
    Spain, EU
    Posts
    2,949
    Quote Originally Posted by Donnie27 View Post
    Why do they keep calling it 1160, rounded?
    At the beginning it was 1160, but Intel made some changes and it is 1156 now. If you have seen 1160 in a recent article is because the autor is misinformed or something.
    Friends shouldn't let friends use Windows 7 until Microsoft fixes Windows Explorer (link)


    Quote Originally Posted by PerryR, on John Fruehe (JF-AMD) View Post
    Pretty much. Plus, he's here voluntarily.

  16. #116
    I am Xtreme
    Join Date
    Jul 2004
    Location
    Little Rock
    Posts
    7,204
    Quote Originally Posted by STaRGaZeR View Post
    At the beginning it was 1160, but Intel made some changes and it is 1156 now. If you have seen 1160 in a recent article is because the autor is misinformed or something.
    OK, thanks!
    Quote Originally Posted by Movieman
    With the two approaches to "how" to design a processor WE are the lucky ones as we get to choose what is important to us as individuals.
    For that we should thank BOTH (AMD and Intel) companies!


    Posted by duploxxx
    I am sure JF is relaxed and smiling these days with there intended launch schedule. SNB Xeon servers on the other hand....
    Posted by gallag
    there yo go bringing intel into a amd thread again lol, if that was someone droping a dig at amd you would be crying like a girl.
    qft!

  17. #117
    Xtreme Guru
    Join Date
    Aug 2003
    Location
    Athens, Greece
    Posts
    3,656
    Things look very promising. Especially for us 775 users...
    Project ZEUS II

    Asus Rampage II Extreme
    Intel I7 920 D0 3930A @ 4.50GHz (21 X 214mhz)
    3 x 2GB G.Skill Trident 1600 @ 1716MHz (6-8-6-20-1N)
    2 x Asus HD 6870 CrossFire @ 1000/1100MHz
    OCZ Vertex 2 60GB | Intel X25-M 120GB | WD Velociraptor 150GB | Seagate FreeAgent XTreme 1.5TB esata
    Asus Xonar DX | Logitech Z-5500 | LG W2600HP 26" S-IPS LCD

    Watercooling setup:
    1st loop -> Radiator: 2 x ThermoChill PA120.3 | Pump: Laing DDC-3.25 with Alphacool HF 38 top | CPU: Swiftech Apogee XT | Chipset: Swiftech MCW-NBMAX | Tubing: Masterkleer 1/2" UV
    2nd loop -> Radiator: ThermoChill PA120.3 | Pump: Laing DDC-3.2 with Alphacool HF 38 top | GPU: 2 x EK FC-6870 | Tubing: Masterkleer 1/2" UV


    Assembled in Mountain Mods Ascension Trinity
    Powered by Corsair Professional Series Gold AX1200

  18. #118
    Xtremely Retired OC'er
    Join Date
    Dec 2006
    Posts
    1,084
    Quote Originally Posted by sxs112 View Post
    IM curios, can you post upload i5 "MultiCore Benchmark" file/score to the site?
    http://www.xtremesystems.org/forums/...d.php?t=210021
    Last edited by Nikolasz; 12-10-2008 at 01:45 PM.

  19. #119
    I am Xtreme
    Join Date
    Jul 2004
    Location
    Little Rock
    Posts
    7,204
    Quote Originally Posted by Ego View Post
    IM curios, can you post upload i5 "MultiCore Benchmark" file/score to the site?
    This close to Phenom II and there's more info on this thing thats at least 8 months from shipping
    Quote Originally Posted by Movieman
    With the two approaches to "how" to design a processor WE are the lucky ones as we get to choose what is important to us as individuals.
    For that we should thank BOTH (AMD and Intel) companies!


    Posted by duploxxx
    I am sure JF is relaxed and smiling these days with there intended launch schedule. SNB Xeon servers on the other hand....
    Posted by gallag
    there yo go bringing intel into a amd thread again lol, if that was someone droping a dig at amd you would be crying like a girl.
    qft!

  20. #120
    Xtreme Mentor
    Join Date
    Oct 2005
    Posts
    2,788
    Quote Originally Posted by Donnie27 View Post


    8 months retarded? Ooooo you just called all those folks talking about Deneb for the last 13 months or waiting even longer than 8 months retarded. Now you take it back right now
    Deneb will be the new top of the line from AMD, the i5 is a downgrade from what is already out, the i7. That is the difference here.
    Asus Rampage II Gene | Core i7 920 | 6*2GB Mushkin 998729 | BFG GTX280 OCX | Auzentech X-Fi Forte | Corsair VX550
    —Life is too short to be bound by the moral, ethical and legal constraints imposed on us by modern day society.

  21. #121
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    Aug 2008
    Posts
    2,036
    Quote Originally Posted by Vozer View Post
    Thank you.

    I'm too lazy to count the number of pins on Lynnfield CPU in this picture.

    http://i245.photobucket.com/albums/g...ehalem/L_5.jpg
    The miniaturization and those oval lands is just awesome. That thing looks so yummy in the foreground...it almost makes you wish they were edible.

  22. #122
    HWiNFO Author
    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Location
    /dev/null
    Posts
    801
    Quote Originally Posted by STaRGaZeR View Post
    At the beginning it was 1160, but Intel made some changes and it is 1156 now. If you have seen 1160 in a recent article is because the autor is misinformed or something.
    Not exactly - certain A0 samples (which this one actually is) were 1160-pin. All later parts will be 1156.

  23. #123
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    Apr 2007
    Posts
    2,476
    Quote Originally Posted by Spacemaster View Post
    You think that clock can be default clock?
    better off going 775
    i3 2100, MSI H61M-E33. 8GB G.Skill Ripjaws.
    MSI GTX 460 Twin Frozr II. 1TB Caviar Blue.
    Corsair HX 620, CM 690, Win 7 Ultimate 64bit.

  24. #124
    Xtreme Mentor
    Join Date
    Nov 2006
    Location
    Spain, EU
    Posts
    2,949
    Quote Originally Posted by Mumak View Post
    Not exactly - certain A0 samples (which this one actually is) were 1160-pin. All later parts will be 1156.
    Interesting. Do you know the reasons for the change?
    Friends shouldn't let friends use Windows 7 until Microsoft fixes Windows Explorer (link)


    Quote Originally Posted by PerryR, on John Fruehe (JF-AMD) View Post
    Pretty much. Plus, he's here voluntarily.

  25. #125
    HWiNFO Author
    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Location
    /dev/null
    Posts
    801
    Quote Originally Posted by STaRGaZeR View Post
    Interesting. Do you know the reasons for the change?
    Yep - at least what Intel says
    But I suppose I can't say that...

Page 5 of 9 FirstFirst ... 2345678 ... LastLast

Bookmarks

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •