Results 1 to 25 of 210

Thread: Intel Core i5 Performance

Hybrid View

  1. #1
    Coat It with GOOOO
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Location
    Portland, OR
    Posts
    1,608
    Quote Originally Posted by George_o/c View Post
    But why noone answers my question ... ? i5 is less expensive than i7, and still it performs better in the benchmarks we saw ... It simply, doesn't make sense ...
    you must have missed my post at the bottom of the last page....

    as a platform, i5 will be cheaper.
    Main-- i7-980x @ 4.5GHZ | Asus P6X58D-E | HD5850 @ 950core 1250mem | 2x160GB intel x25-m G2's |
    Wife-- i7-860 @ 3.5GHz | Gigabyte P55M-UD4 | HD5770 | 80GB Intel x25-m |
    HTPC1-- Q9450 | Asus P5E-VM | HD3450 | 1TB storage
    HTPC2-- QX9750 | Asus P5E-VM | 1TB storage |
    Car-- T7400 | Kontron mini-ITX board | 80GB Intel x25-m | Azunetech X-meridian for sound |


  2. #2
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Location
    Greece
    Posts
    1,692
    Quote Originally Posted by Blauhung View Post
    you must have missed my post at the bottom of the last page....

    as a platform, i5 will be cheaper.
    No I've read every post of this thead thoroughly ... every word maybe twice

    I know it will be cheaper as a platform than i7 ... but why it's cheaper than i7 yet performs better than i7 ?

  3. #3
    Coat It with GOOOO
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Location
    Portland, OR
    Posts
    1,608
    Quote Originally Posted by George_o/c View Post
    No I've read every post of this thead thoroughly ... every word maybe twice

    I know it will be cheaper as a platform than i7 ... but why it's cheaper than i7 yet performs better than i7 ?
    ah, sorry, It's late and I'm still stuck at work.

    Most likely this is due to the fact that there's just less components to the platform. The i5 removes several unnecessary layers of hardware that just don't need to be there on a single socket board with the current arch.

    Also, Core i7 is the server platform shoehorned into the single socket high end consumer market. Server platforms always tend to make sacrifices on performance to compromise and improve reliability and efficiency on specific work loads.
    Main-- i7-980x @ 4.5GHZ | Asus P6X58D-E | HD5850 @ 950core 1250mem | 2x160GB intel x25-m G2's |
    Wife-- i7-860 @ 3.5GHz | Gigabyte P55M-UD4 | HD5770 | 80GB Intel x25-m |
    HTPC1-- Q9450 | Asus P5E-VM | HD3450 | 1TB storage
    HTPC2-- QX9750 | Asus P5E-VM | 1TB storage |
    Car-- T7400 | Kontron mini-ITX board | 80GB Intel x25-m | Azunetech X-meridian for sound |


  4. #4
    I am Xtreme
    Join Date
    Jul 2004
    Location
    Little Rock
    Posts
    7,204
    Quote Originally Posted by George_o/c View Post
    No I've read every post of this thead thoroughly ... every word maybe twice

    I know it will be cheaper as a platform than i7 ... but why it's cheaper than i7 yet performs better than i7 ?
    PCI-E controller is on die on the i5 and is NOT on the i7 but i7 has more PCI-E lanes.

    It's how you use it maybe. i7 is made to do lots more of a server chip made for multi-tasking, Vitalization, connect to other chip (disable sections) and etc.... It also has more PCI-E lanes. Sure there are little or smaller gains to be seen now . It is just like comparing Dual core compared to Quad core about 18 months ago. As more and more threads are ran, bandwidth is chewed up or used. So sure one test at time might not show much difference, let's put it to work on more than one thing at time and see what happens?
    Quote Originally Posted by Movieman
    With the two approaches to "how" to design a processor WE are the lucky ones as we get to choose what is important to us as individuals.
    For that we should thank BOTH (AMD and Intel) companies!


    Posted by duploxxx
    I am sure JF is relaxed and smiling these days with there intended launch schedule. SNB Xeon servers on the other hand....
    Posted by gallag
    there yo go bringing intel into a amd thread again lol, if that was someone droping a dig at amd you would be crying like a girl.
    qft!

  5. #5
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2008
    Posts
    288
    Quote Originally Posted by George_o/c View Post
    No I've read every post of this thead thoroughly ... every word maybe twice

    I know it will be cheaper as a platform than i7 ... but why it's cheaper than i7 yet performs better than i7 ?
    I would say that it depends on the application. i7 is a workstation so it will perform better on those apps. i5 is desktop so it will perform better on desktop apps. As far as price well it's cheaper to fab i5 i.e. die size? yields?

  6. #6
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    Jan 2005
    Posts
    1,730
    Quote Originally Posted by qurious63ss View Post
    I would say that it depends on the application. i7 is a workstation so it will perform better on those apps. i5 is desktop so it will perform better on desktop apps. As far as price well it's cheaper to fab i5 i.e. die size? yields?
    They are identical except I5 has PCI-E and lacks QPI , a small change to the uncore part.
    Quote Originally Posted by Heinz Guderian View Post
    There are no desperate situations, there are only desperate people.

Bookmarks

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •