MMM
Results 1 to 25 of 1265

Thread: AMD Shanghai/Deneb Review Thread

Threaded View

  1. #11
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    Apr 2008
    Location
    Birmingham AL.
    Posts
    1,079
    Quote Originally Posted by iocedmyself View Post
    http://valid.canardpc.com/show_oc.php?id=459673

    well just got the gift of uber shinies, from the same batch of chips that the 4.7 air cooled chip and the 5+ (common we all know it was 6.2 before nda crack down)

    After a small scare in which my hardware loving cat (black of course) knocked the chip as it sat in it's blue factory carrier on the ground knocking a fair deal of pins out of whack... got them straightened out last night.

    So that is 3.6 @ 1.2125v (stock 3ghz 1.35v) Idle temps are aroud 30c in 23c ambient with a TT duoOrb heatsink load temps are 35c after continous load.

    Have taken it past 4.5ghz though more interested in finding max clock at lowest voltage atm.
    Sounds like a nice chip............hope to hear more info from you

    Quote Originally Posted by SoF View Post
    I would love to show some real results right away...had my hands on it yesterday and if it scales with cold, 5.5gig will be easy. 3.6 @ 1.2125v sounds real good, I didn't test it below 1.375V but >4gig it seemed to need 1.42-1.44V (no ACC yet)...
    Sounds like they will clock good on SB600 as rumored
    Last edited by G0ldBr1ck; 12-09-2008 at 10:42 AM.
    Particle's First Rule of Online Technical Discussion:
    As a thread about any computer related subject has its length approach infinity, the likelihood and inevitability of a poorly constructed AMD vs. Intel fight also exponentially increases.

    Rule 1A:
    Likewise, the frequency of a car pseudoanalogy to explain a technical concept increases with thread length. This will make many people chuckle, as computer people are rarely knowledgeable about vehicular mechanics.

    Rule 2:
    When confronted with a post that is contrary to what a poster likes, believes, or most often wants to be correct, the poster will pick out only minor details that are largely irrelevant in an attempt to shut out the conflicting idea. The core of the post will be left alone since it isn't easy to contradict what the person is actually saying.

    Rule 2A:
    When a poster cannot properly refute a post they do not like (as described above), the poster will most likely invent fictitious counter-points and/or begin to attack the other's credibility in feeble ways that are dramatic but irrelevant. Do not underestimate this tactic, as in the online world this will sway many observers. Do not forget: Correctness is decided only by what is said last, the most loudly, or with greatest repetition.

    Remember: When debating online, everyone else is ALWAYS wrong if they do not agree with you!

Bookmarks

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •