Results 1 to 25 of 397

Thread: AMD Shows Deneb (Phenom II) pictures of 6.2GHz CPUz etc

Hybrid View

  1. #1
    I am Xtreme
    Join Date
    Jul 2007
    Location
    Austria
    Posts
    5,485
    Quote Originally Posted by Tiridum View Post
    more cores = more bandwidth needed, no?
    because each core is fighting for it
    Your mixing up intercore bandwidth with memory bandwidth... and for what do they need to fight?

    For 95% of desktop apps a C2 with a "antique " fsb is enough. The only desktop apps that benefit for massive memory bandwidth are file archivers and encryption.

  2. #2
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    Oct 2005
    Location
    EvE-Online, Tranquility
    Posts
    1,978
    Quote Originally Posted by Leeghoofd View Post
    Yeah that's why I meant in fact, I can see that some AM2+ users will get some new life... I just hope it performs... sadly for AMD not many high performance Intel S775 users will jump on Phenom II ( unless they got some more nice surprises in the sleeve )

    Let's hope that AMD puts the CPU's out at very competitive prices... as many might still be tempted to use S775.

    Looking from my point of view (hardware wise) I just might replace the Striker to mess with one of these... just to have something new

    Will there be much gain with AM3 over AM2+ ( I lost track of AMD innovations long time ago) performance wise ?
    Ah that way. Yeah, AMD platform is cheaper, but it ain't if you move from a skt 775 just for Deneb and get the same performance

    Quote Originally Posted by Hornet331 View Post
    Amd promised a 3-5% gain with the switch to DDR3 form DDR2, but tbh i dont belive this. We didn't saw any appreciable increasments from DDR to DDR2, on intel it was even worse from DDR2 to DDR3. Bandwidth playes an underpart for Desktop apps.
    I dont know really. 5% is quite a bit of a jump. However, did AMD said this or FUD?

    Anyway, I dont think it's comparable to Intel's move from DDR2 to DDR3. There's a reason i7 uses QPI
    Synaptic Overflow

    CPU:
    -Intel Core i7 920 3841A522
    --CPU: 4200Mhz| Vcore: +120mV| Uncore: 3200Mhz| VTT: +100mV| Turbo: On| HT: Off
    ---CPU block: EK Supreme Acetal| Radiator: TCF X-Changer 480mm
    Motherboard:
    -Foxconn Bloodrage P06
    --Blck: 200Mhz| QPI: 3600Mhz
    Graphics:
    -Sapphire Radeon HD 4870X2
    --GPU: 750Mhz| GDDR: 900Mhz
    RAM:
    -3x 2GB Mushkin XP3-12800
    --Mhz: 800Mhz| Vdimm: 1.65V| Timings: 7-8-7-20-1T
    Storage:
    -3Ware 9650SE-2LP RAID controller
    --2x Western Digital 74GB Raptor RAID 0
    PSU:
    -Enermax Revolution 85+ 1250W
    OS:
    -Windows Vista Business x64


    ORDERED: Sapphire HD 5970 OC
    LOOKING FOR: 2x G.Skill Falcon II 128GB SSD, Windows 7

  3. #3
    Banned
    Join Date
    Nov 2008
    Posts
    57
    Quote Originally Posted by Hornet331 View Post
    Your mixing up intercore bandwidth with memory bandwidth... and for what do they need to fight?
    well let's assume a cpu has 10GB/s of bandwidth available, so each core (on average) has 2.5GB/s in mulithreaded apps, i this enough to feed the core with data?

  4. #4
    Xtreme Cruncher
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Location
    Denmark
    Posts
    7,747
    Quote Originally Posted by Tiridum View Post
    well let's assume a cpu has 10GB/s of bandwidth available, so each core (on average) has 2.5GB/s in mulithreaded apps, i this enough to feed the core with data?
    Thats very unlikely. Plus there is the caches to remove external bandwidth demand.
    Crunching for Comrades and the Common good of the People.

Bookmarks

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •