Page 7 of 51 FirstFirst ... 4567891017 ... LastLast
Results 151 to 175 of 1265

Thread: AMD Shanghai/Deneb Review Thread

  1. #151
    Xtreme Enthusiast
    Join Date
    Dec 2006
    Location
    France
    Posts
    741
    I guess nothing personally.
    Some want CpuZ validation. Here they are!
    Cooling? unknow.
    Voltage? unknow.
    Just one guy manage 4.4GHz with PII940
    AMD Phenom II X2 550@Phenom II X4 B50
    MSI 890GXM-G65
    Corsair CMX4GX3M2A1600C9 2x2GB
    Sapphire HD 6950 2GB

  2. #152
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Posts
    211

    Question

    Quote Originally Posted by AbelJemka View Post
    First i don't think this guy have right to valide CpuZ cause of NDA.
    Second i just post link i make zero assumption contrary to u.
    if u can conclude base on this link that AMD can't do 5 GHz... you are very good, very, very good
    Well the NDA didn't held back the 4.4GHz validation... so why should it prevent anyone from showing a 5GHz+ validation, which would be good publicity.. ain't it?

    Quote Originally Posted by informal View Post
    Exactly.Plus,if I had to guess,I'd say all of those submitted clocks are done with air/wc.
    So, none of them tried DI or LN2?

  3. #153
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Location
    Hungary (EU)
    Posts
    1,376
    Quote Originally Posted by informal View Post
    I think Theo was speaking about AM2+ version .
    Also i think DDR3/AM3 Denebs will not need higher NB clocks more than DDR2/AM2+ ones.
    In any case,the NB clocks never crossed the 1.3 ratio mark like i've shown in my previous post.Not even on Shanghai 45nm parts(which are socketF,not F+/HT3.0).
    I don't agree with you. The article clearly states that he was speaking about the AM3 modells. I think that it can't reach 16GB/s from DDR2 and they'll need higher NB frequencies to take advantage somehow from the faster DDR3 modules.
    -

  4. #154
    Xtreme Enthusiast
    Join Date
    Dec 2006
    Location
    France
    Posts
    741
    Quote Originally Posted by Ghostbuster View Post
    Well the NDA didn't held back the 4.4GHz validation... so why should it prevent anyone from showing a 5GHz+ validation, which would be good publicity.. ain't it?

    So, none of them tried DI or LN2?
    Someguy could play with PII940 and was careless enough to validate is score so it show on the new CpuZ Hall of Fame, that's the story plain and simple
    I don't understand why you try to extrapolate about that Ghostbuster...
    Why no 5GHz screenies? Don't know! Maybe No one can, what will probably make you happy
    AMD Phenom II X2 550@Phenom II X4 B50
    MSI 890GXM-G65
    Corsair CMX4GX3M2A1600C9 2x2GB
    Sapphire HD 6950 2GB

  5. #155
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    Sep 2007
    Location
    Munich, DE
    Posts
    1,401
    Quote Originally Posted by AbelJemka View Post
    Nice, thank you. They all have to use very low ht speeds here, would be nice if cpu-z would show the nb speed on the validation page.
    Can be they do not need >2GHz now because the L3 works more efficient in terms of latencies and bandwidth.
    Last edited by justapost; 12-04-2008 at 12:20 PM.

  6. #156
    Xtreme Mentor
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Location
    cleveland ohio
    Posts
    2,879
    Quote Originally Posted by Oliverda View Post
    I don't agree with you. The article clearly states that he was speaking about the AM3 modells. I think that it can't reach 16GB/s from DDR2 and they'll need higher NB frequencies to take advantage somehow from the faster DDR3 modules.
    over clocked ram would be needed I can't find the post but someone with 1,200mhz ram was getting 13.5gbs in sandra.
    besides putting more then 2.2 volts can kill some chips,don't know about these new chips but my chip gets hotter at 2.0 ram volts.
    HAVE NO FEAR!
    "AMD fallen angel"
    Quote Originally Posted by Gamekiller View Post
    You didn't get the memo? 1 hour 'Fugger time' is equal to 12 hours of regular time.

  7. #157
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    Sep 2008
    Location
    Romania
    Posts
    157
    http://valid.canardpc.com/show_oc.php?id=452168

    1. lol OC on an AsRock
    2. 4.1GHz OC done without raising the multi? Maybe I'm wrong but I thought HT OC is kinda weak on Phenoms..

    That P2 920 looks better and better, I don't think I'll have the money for a 940 anyway. I have to get a decent MB too...
    the state is universally evil, there is no good country only good people

  8. #158
    Xtreme Mentor
    Join Date
    Nov 2005
    Location
    Devon
    Posts
    3,437
    Quote Originally Posted by azraeel101 View Post
    http://valid.canardpc.com/show_oc.php?id=452168

    1. lol OC on an AsRock
    2. 4.1GHz OC done without raising the multi? Maybe I'm wrong but I thought HT OC is kinda weak on Phenoms..

    That P2 920 looks better and better, I don't think I'll have the money for a 940 anyway. I have to get a decent MB too...
    I was going to point to this validation, but you're faster

    Regarding HTT clocking, even recent 9950BE are doing 270-300HTT easily.
    RiG1: Ryzen 7 1700 @4.0GHz 1.39V, Asus X370 Prime, G.Skill RipJaws 2x8GB 3200MHz CL14 Samsung B-die, TuL Vega 56 Stock, Samsung SS805 100GB SLC SDD (OS Drive) + 512GB Evo 850 SSD (2nd OS Drive) + 3TB Seagate + 1TB Seagate, BeQuiet PowerZone 1000W

    RiG2: HTPC AMD A10-7850K APU, 2x8GB Kingstone HyperX 2400C12, AsRock FM2A88M Extreme4+, 128GB SSD + 640GB Samsung 7200, LG Blu-ray Recorder, Thermaltake BACH, Hiper 4M880 880W PSU

    SmartPhone Samsung Galaxy S7 EDGE
    XBONE paired with 55'' Samsung LED 3D TV

  9. #159
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    Nov 2005
    Posts
    1,084
    Those 4.4xx Mhz where Air or Water-cooling?
    Quote Originally Posted by Shintai View Post
    And AMD is only a CPU manufactor due to stolen technology and making clones.

  10. #160
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    Sep 2008
    Location
    Romania
    Posts
    157
    Quote Originally Posted by Lightman View Post
    Regarding HTT clocking, even recent 9950BE are doing 270-300HTT easily.
    Thanks for that info
    So that settles it, I'll go for the 920 and oc with HT like real men do
    Now I gotta decide on what mobo to get...
    the state is universally evil, there is no good country only good people

  11. #161
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    Sep 2007
    Location
    Munich, DE
    Posts
    1,401
    Quote Originally Posted by azraeel101 View Post
    1. lol OC on an AsRock
    Best 790GX board I had, I archived the same results as on the GBT 790GX.
    Quote Originally Posted by Lightman View Post
    Regarding HTT clocking, even recent 9950BE are doing 270-300HTT easily.
    But only if you run (stable) with an modest NB speed which eats up most of the bandwidth gains.

  12. #162
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Posts
    211

    Wink

    Quote Originally Posted by v_rr View Post
    Those 4.4xx Mhz where Air or Water-cooling?
    Check http://www.xtremesystems.org/forums/...6&postcount=12
    Quote Originally Posted by Pt1t View Post


    This oc was under phase change (-40°) .

  13. #163
    Xtreme Cruncher
    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Posts
    6,215
    Ghostbuster,the thing haven't launched yet,and you're eager to show it OCs like a dog based on 3 submissions...Give it time for more people to try and use the chip first.The more people try out new Phenoms ,more results will be coming in.Heck ,many boards haven't got the bios support yet

  14. #164
    Xtreme Cruncher
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Location
    Denmark
    Posts
    7,747
    Quote Originally Posted by informal View Post
    Ghostbuster,the thing haven't launched yet,and you're eager to show it OCs like a dog based on 3 submissions...Give it time for more people to try and use the chip first.The more people try out new Phenoms ,more results will be coming in.Heck ,many boards haven't got the bios support yet
    And you are doing what again? Hype? Or eager to show it OCs like mad?

    Quote Originally Posted by informal View Post
    Exactly.Plus,if I had to guess,I'd say all of those submitted clocks are done with air/wc.
    Quote Originally Posted by v_rr View Post
    Those 4.4xx Mhz where Air or Water-cooling?
    He simply pointed out it was done under phase change at -40C.
    Last edited by Shintai; 12-05-2008 at 03:25 AM.
    Crunching for Comrades and the Common good of the People.

  15. #165
    Xtreme Cruncher
    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Posts
    6,215
    Reading comprehension problems?
    I said:"Plus,if I had to guess". Guess means guess.Like i said it's 3 submissions.Three. Also,we've already seen the 6.2Ghz screen shot most people demanded.
    Today is a Chicago event at which some of XSers will be present,maybe you should ask them what is going on?

    edit: if you're going to do more ninja edits,i might do it as well .If you follow his last postings ,it seems he is trying to find something/anything wrong with the submissions or results. Even though it's good to remain skeptical,he seems as if he is on a mission or something ... We simply have almost no clues ,for the time being ,how this thing OCs or performs. Some demo and a few results like Vantage.
    Last edited by informal; 12-05-2008 at 03:31 AM.

  16. #166
    Xtreme Cruncher
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Location
    Denmark
    Posts
    7,747
    Quote Originally Posted by informal View Post
    Reading comprehension problems?
    I said:"Plus,if I had to guess". Guess means guess.Like i said it's 3 submissions.Three. Also,we've already seen the 6.2Ghz screen shot most people demanded.
    Today is a Chicago event at which some of XSers will be present,maybe you should ask them what is going on?
    So you got dissapointed with the phase change. Poor you.

    It still doesnt change the fact Ghostbuster posted. You should be happy that he cleared your doubt.

    Quote Originally Posted by informal View Post
    edit: if you're going to do more ninja edits,i might do it as well .If you follow his last postings ,it seems he is trying to find something/anything wrong with the submissions or results. Even though it's good to remain skeptical,he seems as if he is on a mission or something ... We simply have almost no clues ,for the time being ,how this thing OCs or performs.
    And you are on a crusade to bully whoever doesnt post the shiny information you wish for? Its obviously ok to post above and beyond. But posting something thats less of your wishes? Ouch.

    Double standards is fun aint it?
    Last edited by Shintai; 12-05-2008 at 03:32 AM.
    Crunching for Comrades and the Common good of the People.

  17. #167
    Xtreme Enthusiast
    Join Date
    Dec 2006
    Location
    France
    Posts
    741
    Informal try to guess and he missed
    Now you have on point in common with Informal, seems you both not very good at guessing game
    Quote Originally Posted by Shintai View Post
    Looks like 2008 will be another year with complete nVidia dominance.
    joking

    Quote Originally Posted by Shintai View Post
    So you got dissapointed with the phase change. Poor you.

    It still doesnt change the fact Ghostbuster posted. You should be happy that he cleared your doubt.
    Facts stay facts. Now we know it was phase change but we don't know if it was his max frequency!
    AMD Phenom II X2 550@Phenom II X4 B50
    MSI 890GXM-G65
    Corsair CMX4GX3M2A1600C9 2x2GB
    Sapphire HD 6950 2GB

  18. #168
    Xtreme Cruncher
    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Posts
    6,215
    Quote Originally Posted by Shintai View Post
    So you got dissapointed with the phase change. Poor you.

    It still doesnt change the fact Ghostbuster posted. You should be happy that he cleared your doubt.
    Yeah i was "disappointed" by one result lol.. Maybe you should stop guessing,eh?

    As more results come in we will know what it takes to run the thing at 3.8+Ghz and with what cooling.It's too early to say it needs this or that for certain clock.

    edit: ahh futile is the fight with shintel's ninja edit skills...

  19. #169
    Xtreme Cruncher
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Location
    Denmark
    Posts
    7,747
    Quote Originally Posted by AbelJemka View Post
    Informal try to guess and he missed
    Now you have on point in common with Informal, seems you both not very good at guessing game


    joking


    Facts stay facts. Now we know it was phase change but we don't know if it was his max frequency!
    Ofcourse we dont know the max frequency. But we do know it was phase change now and not air or WC.

    But its clearly a hinderance in posting anything less than stellar with this:

    Ghostbuster,the thing haven't launched yet,and you're eager to show it OCs like a dog based on 3 submissions...Give it time for more people to try and use the chip first.The more people try out new Phenoms ,more results will be coming in.Heck ,many boards haven't got the bios support yet
    Instead fo being happy and say nice. 4.4Ghz reached on phase. Lets see if it can improve further!
    Crunching for Comrades and the Common good of the People.

  20. #170
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Posts
    211

    Question

    I'm still a bit skeptical... For one, there weren't any 5GHz validations if Phenom IIs could overclock so easily.

  21. #171
    Xtreme Cruncher
    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Posts
    6,215
    Quote Originally Posted by Ghostbuster View Post
    I'm still a bit skeptical... For one, there weren't any 5GHz validations if Phenom IIs could overclock so easily.
    That's true indeed.But i'm skeptical about what can or can't be posted.On oktabit forums that admin barely posted 3.5+Ghz screen shot(after he got the permission).Vcore was not shown on the screen shot.
    As moloko said,there are some boundaries until NDA lifts.Maybe indeed those chips at CPUz database couldn't go above 4.4Ghz ,wouldn't be the first nor the last time we see "bad" clockers(from extreme POV) from certain batches.Remember Agena already does 4.1+Ghz under cold..

  22. #172
    Xtreme Enthusiast
    Join Date
    Dec 2006
    Location
    France
    Posts
    741
    Quote Originally Posted by Shintai View Post
    Ofcourse we dont know the max frequency. But we do know it was phase change now and not air or WC.

    But its clearly a hinderance in posting anything less than stellar with this:



    Instead fo being happy and say nice. 4.4Ghz reached on phase. Lets see if it can improve further!
    But you reproach him what you did one months ago, chasing all non believers in threads relative to Core i7.
    Quote Originally Posted by Ghostbuster View Post
    I'm still a bit skeptical... For one, there weren't any 5GHz validations if Phenom IIs could overclock so easily.
    How many Core i7 5GHz validations before NDA left? How many simple validations even?
    AMD Phenom II X2 550@Phenom II X4 B50
    MSI 890GXM-G65
    Corsair CMX4GX3M2A1600C9 2x2GB
    Sapphire HD 6950 2GB

  23. #173
    I am Xtreme
    Join Date
    Jul 2007
    Location
    Austria
    Posts
    5,485
    Quote Originally Posted by AbelJemka View Post
    How many Core i7 5GHz validations before NDA left? How many simple validations even?
    Fwik none and thats the point, Intel didn't started a hype, users showed that they can reach more then intel showed.
    Amd on the other hand did a demo of a 6ghz Plus phenom II and set the expectation bar insanely high with that demonstration...

    I call that bad PR, if amd would only have shown a 5GHz pII everyone would be as amazed as we are now, and if retail products oc even higher everyone would be freaking out. Now everyone expects 6ghz and if this is not reached everyone is disappointed...

  24. #174
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    Apr 2007
    Posts
    2,128
    Quote Originally Posted by informal View Post
    Even though it's good to remain skeptical,he seems as if he is on a mission or something ... .
    Appreared after AMD hit 6 GHz. About 90 % of the posts are in threads related to either Intel/AMD.

    My guess:
    *Shintel is reading some XS News at work...*
    "Umg wtf AMD 6 GHZ!?"
    *Calls to Donnie, Ghostbuster() and DrWho*
    Shintel: "MAYDAY MAYDAY AMD HIT 6 GHZ!!"
    Donnie: "So? I am tired of this. I quit!".
    Shintel: "??? "
    DrWho: "Omg. :|" *Goess to save Intel's honour*
    Shintel: "HA HA HA POOR AMD"
    GhostBuster: "Hey guys, I am quite new but I do what I can..."
    ...so they all are on their mission to thrash the competi...on their mission with Holy Olympic Spirit!

    No Intelists were harmed while making this story!
    Last edited by Calmatory; 12-05-2008 at 04:03 AM.

  25. #175
    Xtreme Enthusiast
    Join Date
    Dec 2006
    Location
    France
    Posts
    741
    Quote Originally Posted by Hornet331 View Post
    Fwik none and thats the point, Intel didn't started a hype, users show they can reach more then intel showed.
    Amd on the other hand did a demo of a 6ghz Plus phenom II and set the expectation bar insanely high with that demonstration...

    I call that bad PR, if amd would only have shown a 5GHz pII everyone would be as amazed as we are now, and if retail products oc even higher everyone would be freaking out. Now everyone expects 6ghz and if this is not reached everyone is disappointed...
    You speak like PII is out but it's not.
    You try to judge them before PII even out! Bad PR if it can't reach thoses frequencies.
    But I don't think they are moving Sampsa and SF3D for just 4.4GHz max frequency on phase...
    Quote Originally Posted by Sampsa View Post
    I will be in Chicago event together with SF3D. Kingpin's F1 EE + LN2 + Phenom II X4 940 BE

    See you there
    ps: congrats 2000 posts Hornet331
    AMD Phenom II X2 550@Phenom II X4 B50
    MSI 890GXM-G65
    Corsair CMX4GX3M2A1600C9 2x2GB
    Sapphire HD 6950 2GB

Page 7 of 51 FirstFirst ... 4567891017 ... LastLast

Bookmarks

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •