However, my comment in regards to the extreme clocking regulars doing better is based on the fact that the demonstration was done simply using the multiplier for frequency increases. This meant that the bus frequency was being left to 200MHz and simply multipliers applied at intervals of 0.5x were used for frequency increases.
From my play on the test beds provided (GIGABYTE motherboard and either OCZ Reaper or Corsair Dominator memory with Deneb ES + stock heatsink and rounded out by a HD4870X2) I found it much easier to gain additional CPU frequency by lowering the HTT multi by one and then increasing the HT bus frequency as well as the CPU multiplier.
So in terms of this overclocking information being information that was shown to me or told to me by AMD, it's actually information that was obtained through observation and use - also out of all the media there I was the only one with sub-zero experience/knowledge and therefore a lot of information was obtained just quietly chatting with the guys responsible for the demo both before, during and afterwards. I've got further info like voltages used for what frequencies but that's currently NDA covered - well, the frequencies are but they got up to using 1.95v dropping to 1.936v and didn't go above 2v due to blowing caps on the motherboard (already sent some emails regarding this so hopefully a revision on it's way).
Bookmarks