Quote Originally Posted by mnemonix View Post
Quite, first the Intel engineer thinks he's qualified to say the AMD results may not be representitive of the product when it's released, then counters with a demonstration of a chip cherry picked from 100K units. Hypocrisy and fail in one easy PR exercise. Quite sad and childish really.
Indeed.

Quote Originally Posted by Bgriffs View Post
Hey if it means that somebody at Intel got worried at least a little bit about what this new AMD chip can do then it's nice to see. Now we have some real competition going on between the 2 and we all benefit from it. Intel might be going a little far to come out and say they are cherry picking and tweaking the chip to push it harder but who cares? I wanna see what she can do!
Yes, but say they get 6301Mhz out of it. Not that I would care, but then we've another rush of said fanboys and arrogant Intel PR's trash'n and troll'n trough our threads. Not saying Im afraid for this Intel OC test or whatever.

It's just the fact some guy at a forum is bragging around and now they're going to 'prove' him right by, well, cherry picking from 100K units. I mean, I never saw Tony trashing over other well known brands, nor saaya or any other of these guys.

In the mean time everyone seems to forget AMD broke its own WR with Phenom II by a huge leap. We've seen P4 8Ghz already, I'd be impressed if i7 got near or over it. But lets face it, 6Ghz on an AMD CPU or an Intel CPU makes quite a big difference regarding accomplishments. At least for me.